This article challenges the assertion that civil servants with technical training can be assumed to be technocrats. Contrary to previous findings, the article argues that type of higher education is not a key determinant of variations in technocratic mentality among elite bureaucrats; instead, post-socialization provides a better explanation. One suggested post-socialization mechanism is politicisation, so the more politicized a ministry is, the less technocratic the mentality of the bureaucrats working in it. These suggestions are tested empirically by both re-analysing Putnam’s data from the late 1970s and analysing data from a total survey of elite bureaucrats working in the Government Offices of Sweden. As well as demonstrating that the ‘type of training hypothesis’ is poorly supported, the empirical analysis demonstrates that the technocratic mentality of bureaucrats varies depending on ministerial affiliation. Furthermore, the level of politicisation is connected to the degree of technocratic mentality among the bureaucrats, though not exactly as hypothesized: more politicisation indeed leads to higher ‘tolerance for politics’ among bureaucrats but, counter intuitively, also makes bureaucrats more likely to advocate neutrality rather than political advocacy among civil servants.
Aberbach JD, Putnam RD, and Rockman BA ( 1981) Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Bailey DJ ( 2008) ‘Misperceiving Matters: Elite Ideas and the Failure of the European Constitution’. Comparative European Politics6(1): 33-60.
3.
Cheng L., White L. ( 1990) ‘Elite Transformation and Modern Change in Mainland China and Taiwan: Empirical Data and the Theory of Technocracy’ . The China Quarterly121: 1-35.
4.
Christensen T. ( 1991) ‘Bureaucratic Roles: Political Loyalty and Professional Autonomy’. Scandinavian Political Studies14(4): 303-320.
5.
Clarence E. ( 2002) ‘Technocracy Reinvented: The New Evidence Based Policy Movement’. Public Policy and Administration17(3): 1-11.
6.
Dahlström C. ( 2008) ‘Effects of Politicisation on Welfare State Policies: Comparing Policy Impacts of Politically Appointed Officials in 18 Mature Democracies’ . QoG Working Paper Series2008: 3. The Quality of Government Institute. Gothenburg: Department of Political Science.
7.
Dahlström C.(2009a) ‘The Bureaucratic Politics of Welfare-State Crisis: Sweden in the 1990s’. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration22(2): 217-238.
8.
Dahlström C. ( 2009b) ‘Political Appointments in 18 Democracies, 1975-2007’ . QoG Working Paper Series2009: 18. The Quality of Government Institute. Gothenburg: Department of Political Science.
9.
Dierickx G. ( 2003) ‘Senior Civil Servants and Bureaucratic Change in Belgium’. Governance16(3): 321-348.
10.
Douglas M. ( 1982) In the Active Voice. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
11.
Douglas M. ( 1987) How Institutions Think. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
12.
Driscoll A., Morris J. ( 2001) ‘Stepping Out: Rhetorical Devices and Culture Change Management in the UK Civil Service’. Public Administration79(4): 803-824.
13.
Ehn P., Isberg M., Linde C., and Wallin G. ( 2003) ‘Swedish Bureaucracy in an Era of Change’ . Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration16(3): 429-458.
14.
Eichbaum C., Shaw R. ( 2007a) ‘Ministerial Advisers, Politicisation and the Retreat from Westminster: The Case of New Zealand’. Public Administration85(3): 609-640.
15.
Eichbaum C., Shaw R. ( 2007b) ‘Minding the Minister? Ministerial Advisers in New Zealand Government’. New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online2(2): 95-113.
16.
Eichbaum C., Shaw R. ( 2008) ‘Revisiting Politicisation: Political Advisers and Public Servants in Westminster Systems’. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration21(3): 337-363.
17.
Fischer F. ( 1990) Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
18.
Fischer F. ( 2000) Citizens, Experts, and the Environment. The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19.
Gauld RDC ( 2002) ‘Technocrats at the Helm? The Attitudes of New Zeeland’s Senior Health Officials’. International Journal of Public Administration25(7): 831-857.
20.
Gerring J. ( 2007) Case Study Research: Principles and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
21.
Government Offices of Sweden, Information Department ( 2008) ‘Facts and Figures - Swedish Government Offices’ Yearbook 2007’.
22.
Gregory RJ ( 1991) ‘The Attitudes of Senior Public Servants in Australia and New Zealand: Administrative Reform and Technocratic Consequence ? ’ Governance4(3): 295-331.
23.
Grønnegaard Christensen J. (2006) ‘Ministers and Mandarins under Danish Parliamentarism’. International Journal of Public Administration29(12): 997-1019.
24.
Harrison S., Wood B. ( 1999) ‘Designing Health Service Organization in the UK, 1968 to 1998: From Blueprint to Bright Idea and ‘‘Manipulated Emergence’’’. Public Administration77(4): 751-768.
25.
Huber JD ( 2000) ‘Delegation to Civil Servants in Parliamentary Democracies’ . European Journal of Political Research37(3): 397-413.
26.
Lee K., Raadschelders JCN ( 2008) ‘Political-Administrative Relations: Impact of and Puzzles in Aberbach, Putnam, and Rockman, 1981’. Governance21(3): 419-438.
27.
Lukes S. ( 1974) Power: A Radical View. London : Macmillan.
28.
March JG, Olsen JP ( 1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press .
29.
Matheson A., Weber B., Manning N. and Arnould E. ( 2007) ‘Study on the Political Involvement in Senior Staffing and on the Delineation of Responsibilities Between Ministers and Senior Civil Servant’. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, 2007/6. Paris: OECD.
30.
Meynaud J. ( 1968) Technocracy. London: Faber and Faber.
31.
Mulgan R. ( 2007) ‘Truth in Government and the Politicisation of Public Service Advise’. Public Administration85(3): 569-586.
32.
Nakamura T. ( 2002) ‘A Declining Technocratic Regime: Bureaucracy, Political Parties and Interest Groups in Japan, 1950-2000’, in United Nations Research Institute (ed.) Democracy, Governance and Human Rights, Programme Paper number9.
33.
Öberg P., Svensson T. ( 2010) ‘Does Power Drive Out Trust? Relations between Labour Market Actors in Sweden’. Political Studies58(1): 143-166.
34.
Oldersma J., Janzen-Masrquard M., and Portegijs W. ( 1999) ‘The Iron Ring in Dutch Politics Revisited’ . Public Administration77(2): 335-360.
35.
Page EC, Wright V (eds.) (1999) Bureaucratic Élites in Western European States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
Peters GB, Pierre J. ( 2004) Politicisation of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective . London: Routledge .
37.
Peters GB, Rhodes RAW, and Wright V (eds.) ( 2000) Administering the Summit: Administration of the Core Executive in Developed Countries. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
38.
Pierre J., Ehn P. ( 1999) ‘The Welfare State Managers: Senior Civil Servants in Sweden’ in Page EC, Wright V (eds) Bureaucratic Élites in Western European States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Pierre J. ( 2004) ‘Central Agencies in Sweden: A Report from Utopia’ . in Pollitt C, Talbot C (eds) Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation . London and New York: Routledge .
40.
Pollitt C., Bouckaert G. ( 2004) Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
41.
Pollitt C., Talbot C. ( 2004) Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation. London and New York: Routledge .
42.
Poulsen B. ( 2007) ‘The Question of Roles and Identities in Public Administration’. Scandinavian Political Studies30(4): 469-490.
43.
Premfors R., Sundström G. ( 2007) Regeringskansliet [The Government Offices of Sweden] . Malmö: Liber.
44.
Putnam RD ( 1973) ‘The Political Attitudes of Senior Civil Servants in Western Europe: A Preliminary Report’. British Journal of Political Science3(3): 257-290.
45.
Putnam RD ( 1977) ‘Elite Transformation in Advanced Industrial Societies. An Empirical Assessment of the Theory of Technocracy’. Comparative Political Studies10(3): 383-412.
46.
Radaelli CM ( 1999a) Technocracy in the European Union. London: Longman.
47.
Radaelli CM ( 1999b) ‘The Public Policy of the European Union: Whither Politics of Expertise?’ Journal of European Public Policy6(5): 757-774.
48.
Reck B. ( 2003) Between Democracy and Technocracy: The Role of Experts for the European Parliament. Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag.
49.
Ribbhagen (2008) How Technocratic is a Technocratic Bureaucrat? - Searching for Nuances in the Minds of Bureaucrats. Working paper. Gothenburg : Department of Political Science.
50.
Rose R. ( 1987) ‘Steering the Ship of State: One Tiller but Two Pairs of Hands’. British Journal of Political Science17(4): 409-433.
51.
Rouban L. ( 2003) ‘Politicisation of the Civil Service’ . in Peters GB, Pierre J (eds) Handbook of Public Administration . London: SAGE.
52.
Rouban L. ( 2007) ‘Public Management and Politics: Senior Bureaucrats in France’. Public Administration85(2): 473-501.
53.
Sigma (2007) Political Advisors and Civil Servants in European Countries. SIGMA Paper no.38. GOV/ SIGMA.
54.
Smith N., Hay C. ( 2005) ‘Mapping the Political Discourses of Globalization and European Integration in the United Kingdom and Ireland Empirically’ . European Journal of Political Research47(3): 359-382.
55.
Williams R. ( 1971) Politics and Technology. London : Macmillan.
