Nearly all modern public pension programs involve a substantial transfer of wealth from workers to retirees. If parents love their children, why are these intergenerational transfers politically sustainable? This paper develops a cross-national overlapping generations model to explore the impact of income mobility on the way workers and retirees calculate the long-term value of these programs to their children. Mobility affects their evaluations because these programs also redistribute intragenerationally. The analysis shows why a majority of rational voters who care about their descendants can insist on the preservation of current public pension benefits for themselves but accept a future reduction. Implications of this explanation are tested using comparative intergenerational mobility data and a 2001 Eurobarometer survey on pensions.
AiCNortonEC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters80: 123–129.
2.
AltonjiJGHayashiFKotlikoffLJ (1997) Parental altruism and inter vivos transfers: theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy105: 1121–1156.
3.
AndreßHHeienT (2001) Four worlds of welfare state attitudes? A comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States. European Sociological Review17: 337–356.
4.
ArrondelLMassonA (2006) Altruism, exchange or indirect reciprocity: what do the data on family transfers show? In: KolmS-CYthierJM (eds) Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Vol. 2, pp. 970–1053.
5.
ArzaC (2008) Changing European welfare: the new distributional principles of welfare policy. In: ArzaCKohliM (eds) Pension Reform in Europe: Politics, Policies and Outcomes. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 109–131.
6.
ArzaCKohliM (eds) (2008) Pension Reform in Europe: Politics, Policies and Outcomes. London; New York: Routledge.
7.
BeckerGSMurphyKM (1988) The family and the state. Journal of Law and Economics31: 1–18.
8.
BénabouROkEA (2001) Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: the POUM hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics116: 447–487.
9.
BengstonVL (2001) Beyond the nuclear family: the increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and the Family63: 1–16.
10.
BoeriTBoersch-SupanATabelliniG (2002) Pension reforms and the opinions of European citizens. American Economic Review92: 396–401.
11.
BohnH (2001) Social security and demographic uncertainty. In: CampbellJYFeldsteinM (eds) Risk Aspects of Investment-Based Social Security Reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 202–246.
12.
BohnH (2005) Will Social Security and Medicare remain viable as the U.S. population is aging? An update. In: BrooksRRazinA (eds) Social Security Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BoixC (2003) Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
BoldrinMMontesA (2005) The intergenerational state: public education and pensions. Review of Economic Studies72: 651–664.
15.
BossiLGumusG (2013) Income inequality, mobility, and the welfare state: a political economy model. Macroeconomic Dynamics17: 1198–1226.
16.
BreslowNE (2004) Whither PQL? In: LinDYHeagertyPJ (eds) Proceedings of the Second Seattle Symposium in Biostatistics (Vol. 179) New York: Springer, pp. 1–22.
17.
BreslowNEClaytonDG (1993) Approximating inference in generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association88: 9–25.
18.
BusemeyerMRGoerresAWeschleS (2009) Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing: the rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy19: 195–212.
19.
CampbellAL (2003) How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
CattaneoMAWolterSC (2009) Are the elderly a threat to educational expenditures?European Journal of Political Economy25: 225–236.
21.
ChenKSongZM (2014) Markovian social security in unequal societies. Scandinavian Journal of Economics116(4): 982–1011.
22.
ChristensenT (2006) Eurobarometer 56.1: Social exclusion and modernization of pension systems. September–October2001 [Computer file]. ICPSR03475-v3. Conducted by European Opinion Research Group, Brussels. Cologne, Germany: Zentralarchiv fur Empirische Sozialforschung [producer]. Cologne, Germany: Zentralarchiv fur Empirische Sozialforschung; Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors].
23.
CignoALuporiniAPettiniA (2003) Transfers to parents with children as a principal-agent problem. Journal of Public Economics87: 1165–1177.
24.
ClementiFGallegatiMKaniadakisG (2010) A model of personal income distribution with application to Italian data. Empirical Economics39: 559–591.
25.
ComiS (2004) Intergenerational mobility in Europe: evidence from ECHP. Centre for Household, Income, Labour, and Demographic Economics n. 18/2004.
26.
Conde-RuizJIProfetaP (2007) The redistributive design of social security systems. Economic Journal117: 686–712.
27.
CooleyTFSoaresJ (1999) A positive theory social security based on reputation. Journal of Political Economy107: 135–160.
28.
CorakM (ed) (2004) Generational Income Mobility in North America and Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
CusackTIversenTRehmP (2006) Risks at work: the demand and supply sides of government redistribution. Oxford Review of Economic Policy22: 365–389.
30.
DisneyR (2007) Population ageing and the size of the welfare state: is there a puzzle to explain?European Journal of Political Economy23: 542–553.
31.
FeldsteinMSiebertH (eds) (2002) Social Security Pension Reform in Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Fernández-VillaverdeJKruegerD (2007) Consumption over the life cycle: facts from consumer expenditure survey data. Review of Economics and Statistics89: 552–565.
33.
FongCM (2001) Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics82: 225–246.
FudenbergDTiroleJ (1991) Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
FuratiYAO’DonoghueC (2009) Eliciting individual preferences for pension reform. CESifo working paper no. 2770 (August). Available at: http://www.ssrn.com.
37.
FusterL (1999) Is altruism important for understanding the long-term effects of social security?Review of Economic Dynamics2: 616–637.
38.
FusterLİmrohoroğluAİmrohoroğluS (2003) A welfare analysis of social security in a dynastic framework. International Economic Review44: 1247–1274.
39.
GalassoV (2006) The Political Future of Social Security in Aging Societies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
GalassoVProfetaP (2002) The political economy of social security: a survey. European Journal of Political Economy18: 1–29.
GoerresA (2009) The Political Participation of Older People in Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
GokhaleJ.2007. Unfunded Obligation Measures of EU Countries. In: JoãoNoguei-ra Martins (ed) Fiscal Indicators. Proceedings from the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs Workshop Brussels, September 22, 2006. European Economy Economic Papers (December) No. 297. European Commission.
GrossmanGMHelpmanE (1998) Intergenerational redistribution with short-lived governments. Economic Journal108: 1299–1329.
46.
Hamil-LukerJ (2001) The prospects of age war: inequality between (and within) age groups. Social Science Research30: 386–400.
47.
IchinoAKarabarbounisLMorettiE (2011) The political economy of income mobility. Economic Inquiry49: 47–69.
48.
IversenTSoskiceD (2006) Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review100: 165–181.
49.
JacobsLRShapiroRY (1998) Myths and misunderstandings about public opinion toward Social Security. In: ArnoldRDGraetzMJMunnellAH (eds) Framing the Social Security Debate. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
50.
KangS-GPowellGBJr (2010) Representation and policy responsiveness: the median voter, election rules, and redistributive welfare spending. Journal of Politics72: 1014–1028.
51.
KingGTomzMWittenbergJ (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44: 341–355.
52.
KohliM (1999) Private and public transfers between generations: linking the family and the state. European Societies1: 81–104.
53.
KohliM (2008) Generational equity. In: ArzaCKohliM (eds) Pension Reform in Europe: Politics, Policies and Outcomes. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 196–214.
54.
KotlikoffLJBurnsS (2004) The Coming Generational Storm. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55.
LaferrèreAWolffF-C (2006) Microeconomic models of family transfers. In: KolmS-CYthierJM (eds) Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Vol. 2, pp. 889–969.
56.
LynchJ (2006) Age in the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
LynchJMyrskyläM (2009) Always the third rail? Pension income and policy preferences in european democracies. Comparative Political Studies42: 1068–1097
58.
McGarryK (2000) Testing parental altruism: implications of a dynamic model. NBER working paper 7593. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w7593.
59.
McHaleJ (2001) The Risk of Social Security Benefit-Rule Changes. In: CampbellJYFeldsteinM (eds) Risk Aspects of Investment Based Social Security Reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 247–289.
60.
MoeneKOWallersteinM (2001) Inequality, social insurance, and redistribution. American Political Science Review95: 859–874.
61.
MoeneKOWallersteinM (2003) Earnings inequality and welfare spending: a disaggregated analysis. World Politics55: 485–516.
62.
MulliganCBSala-i-MartinX (1999a) Gerontocracy, retirement, and social security. NBER Working Paper 7117.
63.
MulliganCBSala-i-MartinX (1999b) Social security in theory and practice (I): Facts and political theories. NBER Working Paper 7118.
64.
MulliganCBSala-i-MartinX (1999c) Social security in theory and practice (II): Efficiency theories, narrative theories, and implications for reform. NBER Working Paper 7119.
65.
MulliganCBSala-i-MartinX (2004) Political and economic forces sustaining social security. Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy4(1): 1–54.
66.
NataliDRhodesM (2008) The ‘New Politics’ of pension reforms in continental Europe. In: ArzaCKohliM (eds) Pension Reform in Europe: Politics, Policies and Outcomes. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 25–46.
RaskinRCochranMJ (1986) Interpretations and transformations of scale for the Pratt–Arrow absolute risk aversion coefficient: implications for generalized stochastic dominance. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics11: 204–210.
SvallforsS (2003) Welfare regimes and welfare opinions: a comparison of eight western countries. Social Indicators Research64: 495–520.
79.
TabelliniG (2000) A positive theory of social security. Scandinavian Journal of Economics102: 523–545.
80.
TepeMVanhuysseP (2009) Are aging OECD welfare states on the path to gerontocracy?Journal of Public Policy29: 1–28.
81.
ThomsonDW (1993) A lifetime of privilege? Aging and generations and century’s end. In: BengstonVLAchenbaumWA (eds) The Changing Contract Across Generations. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter, pp. 215–238.
82.
Van GroezenBKiiverHUngerB (2009) Explaining Europeans’ preferences for preference provision. European Journal of Political Economy25: 237–246.
83.
VillanuevaE (2002) Parental altruism under imperfect information: theory and evidence. Universitat Pompeu Fabra Economics and Business working paper no. 650. Available at: http://www.econ.upf.edu/docs/papers/downloads/650.pdf.
84.
WilenskyHL (1975) The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
85.
WilenskyHL (1990) Common problems, divergent policies: an 18-nation study of family policy. Public Affairs Report31: 1–3.
86.
WilliamsonJBWatts-RoyDM (1999) Framing the generational equity debate. In: WilliamsonJBWatts-RoyDMKingsonER (eds) The Generational Equity Debate. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 3–38.
