Prior studies of public pensions emphasize the effect of the political economy on the performance of pension systems. We argue that this approach overlooks important institutional features of pension governance and fails to account for endogenous, indirect, and lagged effects. In this article, we describe those limitations and develop an institutional framework to explain the complexity of public pension governance. We identify and discuss critical environmental conditions, formal institutions, and the causal pathways between institutions and pension performance. We also use a case study of the Florida Retirement System to illustrate the explanatory power of the institutional framework.
ChaneyB. A.CopleyP. A.StoneM. S. (2002). The effect of fiscal stress and balanced budget requirements on the funding and measurement of state pension obligations. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21, 287-313.
3.
CoggburnJ. D.KearneyR. C. (2010). Trouble keeping promises? An analysis of underfunding in state retiree benefits. Public Administration Review, 70, 97-108.
DulebohnJ. H. (1995). A longitudinal and comparative analysis of the funded status of state and local public pension plans. Public Budgeting & Finance, 15(2), 52-72.
6.
EatonT. V.NofsingerJ. R. (2001). An examination of ERR and asset allocation in public pension plans. Financial Accountability & Management, 17, 119-132.
7.
EatonT. V.NofsingerJ. R. (2004). The effect of financial constraints and political pressure on the management of public pension plans. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23, 161-189.
8.
EatonT. V.NofsingerJ. R. (2008). Funding levels and gender in public pension plans. Public Budgeting & Finance, 28(3), 108-128.
GiertzJ. F.PapkeL. E. (2007). Public pension plans: Myths and realities for state budgets. National Tax Journal, 60, 305-323.
13.
HessD. (2005). Protecting and politicizing public pension fund assets: Empirical evidence on the effects of governance structures and practices. University of California Davis Law Review, 39, 187-224.
14.
HsinP. L.MitchellO. S. (2014). The political economy of public pensions: Pension funding, governance, and fiscal stress (Pension Research Council Working Paper). Wharton School Pension Research Council, University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/woppennpr/94-6.htm
15.
JohnsonR. W. (1997). Pension underfunding and liberal retirement benefits among state and local government workers. National Tax Journal, 50(1), 113-142.
16.
KelleyD. G. (2014). The political economy of unfunded public pension liabilities. Public Choice, 158, 21-38.
17.
MarchJ. G.OlsenJ. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York, NY: Free Press.
18.
MarksB. R.RamanK. K.WilsonE. R. (1988). Toward understanding the determinants of pension underfunding in the public sector. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 7(3), 157-183.
19.
MintzbergH. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
MitchellO. S.HsinP. L. (1994). Public sector pension governance and performance. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
21.
MitchellO. S.SmithR. S. (1994). Pension funding in the public sector. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 278-290.
22.
MonahanA. B. (2010). Public pension plan reform: The legal framework. Education, 5, 617-646.
Novy-MarxR.RauhJ. (2011). Public pension promises: How big are they and what are they worth?The Journal of Finance, 66, 1211-1249.
25.
OstromE. (1999). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In SabatierP. A. (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 35-71). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26.
PengJ. (2004). Public pension funds and operating budgets: A tale of three states. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(2), 59-73.
27.
PengJ. (2008). State and local pension fund management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
RichK. T.ZhangJ. X. (2014). Unfunded public pension liabilities and local citizen oversight. Accounting Horizons, 29(1), 23-39.
32.
SchneiderM. (2005). The status of U.S. public pension plans: A review with policy considerations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25, 107-137.
33.
SchneiderM.DamanpourF. (2002). Public choice economics and public pension plan funding: An empirical test. Administration & Society, 34, 57-86.
34.
ScottW. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
SneedC. A.SneedJ. E. (1997). Unfunded pension obligations as a source of fiscal illusion for state governments. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 9(1), 5-20.
36.
StalebrinkO. J. (2012). Public pension funds and assumed rates of return: An empirical examination of public sector defined benefit pension plans. The American Review of Public Administration, 44, 92-111.
37.
ClairT.St. (2013). The impact of budget stabilization funds on state pension contributions. Public Budgeting & Finance, 33(3), 55-74.
38.
SteffenK. (2001). State employee pension plans. In MitchellO. S.HusteadE. C. (Eds.), Pension in the public sector (pp. 41-65). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
ThomM. (2013). All of the above: How fiscal, political, and workforce traits affect pension funding. State and Local Government Review, 45, 163-171.
41.
ThomM. (2015). The drivers of public sector pension reform across the U.S. states. The American Review of Public Administration. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0275074015589342
42.
ThompsonJ. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
43.
TriestR. K.ZhaoB. (2013, December27). The role of economic, fiscal, and financial shocks in the evolution of public sector pension funding (Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working Paper No. 13-26). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2433796
44.
U.S. Census. (1993-2014). Survey of public pensions: State- and locally-administered defined benefit data. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/govs/retire/
45.
U.S. General Accountability Office. (2007). State and local government retiree benefits: Current status of benefit structures, protections, and fiscal outlook for funding future costs. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/assets/270/267150.pdf
46.
UseemM.MitchellO. S. (2000). Holders of the purse strings: Governance and performance of public retirement systems. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 489-506.
47.
WilsonJ. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
