Inadequate contributions are one factor behind the gap between pension assets and benefit liabilities. Each year, many states fail to meet their required pension contribution while others consistently meet or exceed their required amount. This study seeks to identify the factors that shape actual pension contributions across the states. Results suggest that states with smaller long-term funding gaps are more likely to fund required contributions. Legislative professionalism and constitutional collective bargaining privileges reduce annual funding. The effect of partisan and institutional traits was sensitive to methodology. Revenue changes and balanced budget requirements had no significant effect on pension contributions. These results suggest a number of reform avenues, including constitutional, institutional, and programmatic changes of varying political feasibility.
BellanteDonLongJames. 1981. The political economy of the rent-seeking society: The case of public employees and their unions. Journal of Labor Research2:1–14.
3.
BlaisAndréBlakeDonald E.DionStephen. 1997. Governments, PARTIES, and Public Sector Employees: Canada, United States, Britain, and France. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
4.
ChaneyBarbara A.CopleyPaul A.StoneMary S.. 2002. The effect of fiscal stress and balanced budget requirements on the funding and measurement of state pension obligations. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy21:287–13.
5.
ChapmanJeffrey I.2008. State and local fiscal sustainability: The challenges. Public Administration Review68:S115–S131.
6.
ChenGangEbdonCarolKrizKenneth A.LaForgeOliver Maisondieu. 2013. “The management of defined contribution plans in local government.”Public Budgeting & Finance33:75–95.
7.
ChonGina. 2010. States skip pension payments, delay day of reckoning. The Wall Street Journal, January 6, 2015.
8.
CoggburnJerrell D.KearneyRichard C.. 2010. Trouble keeping promises? An analysis of underfunding in state retiree benefits. Public Administration Review70:97–108.
9.
CohenJacobCohenPatriciaWestStephen G.AikenLeona S.. 2002. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
10.
CoreyElizabeth C.GarandJames C.. 2002. Are government employees more likely to vote? An analysis of turnout in the 1996 U.S. national election. Public Choice111:259–83.
EatonTim V.NofsingerJohn R.. 2004. The effect of financial constraints and political pressure on the management of public pension plans. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy23:161–89.
13.
EnnisRichard. 1988. Is A Statewide pension fund a person or a cookie jar? The answer has implications for investment policy. Financial Analysts Journal44:21–27.
14.
FreemanRichard B.2012. The war against public sector collective bargaining in the US. Journal of Industrial Relations54:386–408.
15.
GarandJames C.ParkhurstCatherine T.SeoudRusanne Jourdan. 1991. Bureaucrats, policy attitudes, and political behavior: Extension of the bureau voting model of government growth. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory1:177–212.
16.
GhilarducciTeresaSunWei. 2006. How defined contribution plans and 401(k)s affect employer pension costs. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance5:175–96.
17.
GramlichEdwardRubinfeldDaniel L.. 1982. Voting on public spending: Differences between public employees, transfer recipients, and private workers. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management1:516–33.
18.
GranBrian. 2008. Shifts in public-private provision of retirement income: A four-country comparison. Research on Aging30:507–42.
19.
HessFrederick M.SquireJuliet P.. 2010. But the pension plan was just sitting there: The politics of teacher retirement plans. Education Finance and Policy5:587–616.
20.
HuberEvelyneStephensJohn. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
HunterWilliam J.RankinCarol H.. 1988. The composition of public sector compensation: The effects of bureaucratic size. Journal of Labor Research9:29–42.
22.
JohnsonRichard W.1997. Pension underfunding and liberal retirement benefits among state and local government workers. National Tax Journal50:113–42.
23.
KrauseGeorge A.MeluskyBenjamin F.. 2012. Concentrated powers: Unilateral executive authority and fiscal policymaking in the American states. Journal of Politics74:98–112.
24.
LeighAndrew. 2008. Estimating the impact of gubernatorial partisanship on policy settings and economic outcomes: A regression discontinuity approach. European Journal of Political Economy24:256–68.
25.
MarlowMichael L.OrzechowskiWilliam. 1996. Public sector unions and public spending. Public Choice89:1–16.
26.
MartinLinda J.HendersonGlenn V.Jr. 1983. On bond ratings and pension obligations: A note. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis18:463–70.
27.
MayPeter J.KoskiChris. 2007. State environmental policies: Analyzing green building mandates. Review of Policy Research24:49–65.
28.
MoeTerry M.2006. Political control and the power of the agent. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization22:1–29.
29.
MoeTerry M.2011. Special Interest: Teachers Unions and America’s Public Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
30.
MooneyChristopher Z.2010. Measuring state house speakers’ formal powers, 1981–2010. State Politics & Policy Quarterly13:262–73.
RadcliffBenjaminDavisPatricia. 2000. Labor organization and electoral participation in industrial democracies. American Journal of Political Science44:132–41.
37.
ReillyThomReidMark B.. 2011. Budget shortfalls, employee compensation, and collective bargaining in local governments. State and Local Government Review43:215–23.
38.
RoystonPatrickAmblerGareth. 1999. Nonlinear regression models involving power or exponential functions of covariates. Stata Technical Bulletin49:25–30.
39.
RyuJay EunghaBowlingCynthia J.ChoChung-LaeWrightDeil S.. 2008. Exploring explanations of state agency budgets: Institutional budget actors or exogenous environment?Public Budgeting & Finance28:23–47.
40.
SquirePeverill. 2007. Measuring state legislative professionalism: The squire index revisited. State Politics and Policy Quarterly7:221–27.
41.
SkocpolTheda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
St. ClairTravis. 2013. The impact of budget stabilization funds on state pension contributions. Public Budgeting & Finance33:55–74.
43.
StinchcombeArthur. 1985. The functional theory of social insurance. Politics and Society14:411–30.
44.
ThomMichael. 2013a. All of the above: How fiscal, political and workforce traits affect pension funding. State and Local Government Review45:163–71.
45.
ThomMichael. 2013b. Politics, fiscal necessity or both? factors driving the enactment of defined contribution accounts for public employees. Public Administration Review73:480–9.
46.
TrejoStephen J.1991. Public sector unions and municipal employment. Industrial and Labor Relations Review45:166–80.
47.
TroyLeo. 1994. The New Unionism in the New Society: Public Sector Unions in the Redistributive State. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
