What is the relationship between ballot structure (the manner in which citizens cast their votes) and corruption related to the financing of politics? The author develops a principal agent—model which considers how differences in ballot structure may facilitate or impede attempts by parties to utilize the public administration as a source of electoral resources. Electoral systems which concentrate political career control in the hands of party leaders, such as closed-list proportional representation (CLPR) facilitate the use of the bureaucracy in this manner, whereas electoral systems that undermine party leader control, such as preferential-list proportional representation (PLPR), make it more difficult. The difference in the two systems rests with the degree of leverage enjoyed by party leaders vis-à-vis politically oriented bureaucrats. The capacity for favoritism under CLPR permits party leaders to reward militants who have engaged in risky behavior for the party; PLPR undercuts similar attempts to reward risky behavior.
Alvarez, A. ( 1997) Los Dineros de la Política. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.
2.
Andvig, J.C. and K.O. Moene ( 1990) ‘How Corruption May Corrupt’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization13: 63—76.
3.
Auyero, J. ( 2000) Poor People’s Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
Baron, María (ed.) (2004) Directorio Legislativo (2004—2005). Buenos Aires : CIPPEC.
5.
Bezerra, M.O. ( 1999) Em Nome das ‘Bases’: Política, Favor e Dependência Pessoal. Rio de Janeiro: Dumará.
6.
Brusco, V., M. Nazareno and S. Stokes ( 2004) ‘Vote Buying in Argentina’, Latin American Research Review39(2): 66—88.
7.
Cabral, O. ( 2005) ‘O Assalto ao Estado’, Veja, 20 June.
8.
Cadot, O. ( 1987) ‘Corruption as a Gamble’, Journal of Public Economics33(2): 223—44.
9.
Calvo, E. and M. Escolar ( 2005) La Nueva Política de Partidos en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros.
10.
Capriles Méndez, R. (ed.) (1992) Diccionario de la Corrupción en Venezuela, Vol. III. Caracas: Ediciones Capriles.
11.
Carey, J.M. and M.S. Shugart ( 1995) ‘Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas’, Electoral Studies14(4): 417—39.
12.
Chang, E.C.C. ( 2005) ‘Electoral Incentives for Political Corruption under Open-list Proportional Representation’, Journal of Politics67(3): 716—30.
13.
Coppedge, M. ( 1994) Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
Córdova, L. and C. Murayama ( 2006) Elecciones, Dinero y Corrupción: Pemexgate y Amigos de Fox. Mexico City: Cal y Arena .
15.
Cox, G.W. ( 1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Crisp, B. ( 2000) Democractic Institutional Design. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
de Souza, Antonio Fernando ( 2006) Denúncia no Inquérito n° 2245. Brasília: PGR.
18.
Figueira Leal, P. R. (2005) O PT e o Dilemma da Representação Política. Rio de Janeiro: FGV. França, Ronaldo (2004) ‘O PT Marchou Rumo as Vagas no Governo...’, Veja, 7 July.
19.
Golden, M.A. and E.C.C. Chang ( 2001) ‘Competitive Corruption: Factional Conflict and Political Malfeasance in Postwar Italian Christian Democracy’, World Politics53: 588—622.
20.
Grzymala-Busse, A. ( 2007) Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Holmstrom, B. ( 1982) ‘Moral Hazard in Teams’, Bell Journal of Economics13(2): 324—40.
22.
Jones, M.P., S. Saiegh, P.T. Spiller and M. Tommasi ( 2002) ‘Amateur Legislators — Professional Politicians: The Consequences of Party-centered Electoral Rules in a Federal System’ , American Journal of Political Science46(3): 656—69.
23.
Justiniano, José Guillermo (2000) ‘Speech Given by the National Vice-president of Bolivia’s MNR Party to a Round Table of Party Representatives’, Diálogo Nacional 2000: Agenda Política: 199—204.
24.
Kang, D. ( 2002) Crony Capitalism: Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Keck, M.E. ( 1992) The Worker’s Party and Democratization in Brazil . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
Key, V.O. ( 1942) Politics, Parties and Pressure Groups. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
27.
Kornblith, M. and T. Maingon ( 1985) Estado y Gasto Público en Venezuela, 1936—1980 . Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.
28.
Kunicova, J. and S. Rose-Ackerman ( 2005) ‘Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption’, British Journal of Political Science35: 573—606.
29.
Levitsky, S. ( 2003) Transforming Labor-based Parties in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
López Echagüe, H. ( 1996) El Otro: Una Biografia de Eduardo Duhalde. Buenos Aires: Planeta.
31.
Mainwaring, S.P. ( 1991) ‘Politicians, Parties and Electoral Systems: Brazil in Comparative Perspective’, Comparative Politics24(1): 21—43.
32.
Mainwaring, S.P. ( 1999) Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
Mainwaring, S. P. and T. R. Scully (eds) (1995) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
Molina, J.E. ( 2004) ‘The Unraveling of Venezuela’s Party System: From Party Rule to Personalistic Politics and Deinstitutionalization’ , in J. L. McCoy and D. J. Myers (eds) The Unraveling of Representative Democracy in Venezuela, pp. 152—78. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Naím, M. and A. Francés ( 1995) ‘The Venezuelan Private Sector: From Courting the State to Courting the Market’, in L. W. Goodman, J. M. Forman et al. (eds) Lessons of the Venezuelan Experience, pp. 165—92. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
37.
Njaim, H. ( 1998) ‘Una Parte de la Historia: El Finanaciamiento de la Política (Partidos Políticos, Campañas Electorales y Otros Aspectos) en Venezuela’, in P. del Castillo and D. Zovatto (eds) La Financiacion de la Politica en Iberoamerica, pp. 575—614. San José, CR: IIDH-CAPEL.
38.
Otero, D. ( 1997) El Entorno: La Trama Íntima del Aparato Duhaldista y sus Punteros. Buenos Aires: Nuevohacer .
39.
Pérez Perdomo, R. ( 1995) ‘Corruption and Political Crisis’, in L. W. Goodman, J. M. FormanM. Naim and J. S. Tulchin (eds) Lessons of the Venezuelan Experience, pp. 311—33. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
40.
Persson, T., G. Tabellini and F. Trebbi ( 2003) ‘Electoral Rules and Corruption’, Journal of the European Economic Association1(4): 958—89.
41.
Policarpo, J. ( 2005a) ‘O Homem-Chave do PTB’, Veja, 18 May.
42.
Policarpo, J. ( 2005b) ‘Uma Mentira Contada na PF’, Veja, 8 June.
43.
Rangel, D. A. (1973) Los Mercaderes del Voto. Valencia: Editores Distribuidores Vadell Hermanos. Reed, S. R. (1996) ‘Democracy and the Personal Vote’, Electoral Studies 13(1): 17—28.
44.
Rey, J.C., H. Njaim, A. Stambouli, J. Britto Gonzalez, E.V. Grossi and D. Bautista Urbaneja ( 1981) El Financiamiento de los Partidos Politicos y la Democracia en Venezuala. Caracas: Editorial Ateneo de Caracas.
45.
Rose-Ackerman, S. ( 1978) Corruption: A Study in Political Economy. New York: Academic Press.
46.
Samuels, D.J. ( 1999) ‘Incentives to Cultivate a Party Vote in a Candidate-centric Electoral System’, Comparative Political Studies32(4): 487—518.
47.
Samuels, D.J. ( 2007) ‘Brazilian Democracy under Lula and the PT’ , in J. I. Domínguez and M. Shifter (eds) Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America, pp. 152—76. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
48.
Shefter, M. ( 1977) ‘Party and Patronage: Germany, England and Italy’ , Politics and Society7: 403—52.
49.
Shugart, M.S. ( 2005) ‘Comparative Electoral Systems Research: The Maturation of a Field and the Challenges Ahead’, in M. Gallagher and P. Mitchell (eds) The Politics of Electoral Systems. pp. 25—55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
Spiller, P. and M. Tommasi ( 2003) ‘The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy: A Transactions Cost Approach with Application to Argentina’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization19: 281—306.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
