The mutual shaping of governance and regulation of quality and safety in Dutch healthcare

Abstract

Developing the concepts of governance and regulation is path dependent: working with the complexity of governance and regulation shapes and reshapes both their meaning and form. We conducted a case study on governance and regulation of quality and safety in Dutch hospitals to reveal these processes. We found that governance was given meaning in several phases, ranging from a focus on institutional design (e.g. corporate governance) through coping with incidents and using quality measurements, to prospective risk management. Governance changed incrementally in form and practice. We also saw that governance and regulation are intertwined; regulation shapes governance and is simultaneously shaped by changes in the meaning of governance. Insight into these processes is important to better understand what is defined as “good governance” and “good regulation” in a certain context. Understanding the mutual development of these concepts and practices reveals potential pathways to continuous shaping of good governance.

Keywords

Governance healthcare hospitals quality and safety regulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Francis R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. Executive summary. London, 2013.

Bovenkamp

van de Mul

Quartz

. Institutional layering in governing health-care quality. Public Admin 2013; 92(1): 208–223.

Ezzamel

Reed

. Governance: A code of multiple colours. Human Relat 2008; 61: 597–615.

Rhodes

RAW

. Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organiz Studies 2007; 28: 1243–1264.

Kjaer

. Rhodes' contribution to governance theory: Praise, criticism and the future governance debate. Public Admin 2011; 89: 101–113.

Marks

Cave

Hunter

. Governance for health and wellbeing in the English NHS. J Health Serv Res Pol 2011; 16: 14–21.

Ezzamel M and Reed M. op. cit. p.600.

Robichau

. The mosaic of governance: Creating a picture with definitions, theories, and debates. Policy Studies J 2011; 39: 113–131.

Rhodes RAW. op. cit., p.1246.

10.

Ezzamel M and Reed M. op. cit., p.600.

11.

Robichau RW. op. cit., p.126.

12.

Kjaer AM. op. cit., p.111.

13.

Selznick

. Focusing organizational research on regulation. In: Noll R (Ed) Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.

14.

Levi-Faur D. ed. Handbook on the politics of regulation. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2011.

15.

Walshe

Shortell

. Social regulation of healthcare organizations in the United States: Developing a framework for evaluation. Health Service Manage Res 2004; 17: 79–99.

16.

Walshe K. Rotterdam 4 June 2015, personal presentation.

17.

Rhodes RAW. op. cit. p.1259.

18.

Chambers

Benson

Boyd

. Assessing governance theory and practice in health-care organizations: A survey of UK hospices. Health Service Manage Res 2012; 25: 87–96.

19.

Legemaate

Grit

Plomp

. Thematische wetsevaluatie, Bestuursrechtelijk toezicht op de kwaliteit van de zorg. Den Haag: ZonMw, 2013.

20.

Behr

Grit

Bal

. Framing and reframing critical incidents in hospitals. Health Risk Soc 2015; 17: 81–97.

21.

Freeman

. Using performance indicators to improve healthcare quality in the public sector: A review of the literature. Health Service Manage Res 2002; 15: 126–137.

22.

Dückers

Wagner

Vos

. Understanding organisational development, sustainability, and diffusion of innovations within hospitals participating in a multilevel quality collaborative. Implement Sci 2011; 6: 18–18.

23.

Blok

de Koster

Schilp

. Implementatie VMS veiligheidsprogramma Evaluatieonderzoek in Nederlandse ziekenhuizen, Utrecht/Amsterdam: Nivel en EMGO+, 2013.

24.

Hood C, Rothstein H and Baldwin R. The government of risk: Understanding risk regulation regimes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2001.

25.

Bovenkamp H, van de Mul M, Quartz J, et al. op. cit. p.10.

26.

Stoopendaal

De Bree

Keuter

. Systeem Toezicht in de Nederlandse gezondheidszorg. Een experimentele innovatie van toezicht. Tijdschrift voor Toezicht 2014; 2: 27–46.

27.

Zeitlin

. Towards governance-based regulation? The WRR report on Toezien op publieke belangen in European and International perspective. Tijdschrift voor Toezicht 2013; 4: 10–15.

28.

Gunningham

Sinclair

. Organizational trust and the limits of management-based regulation. Law Society Rev 2009; 43: 865–890.

29.

Coglianese

Lazer

. Management-based regulation: Prescribing private management to achieve public goals. Law Soc Rev 2003; 37: 691–730.