This study examined the determinants of Vietnamese students’ enrolment decisions in cultural and creative industries (CCIs) programmes. A mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating survey data from 716 students across seven universities with 15 semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM), which identified three clusters of determinants, including personal, social, and environmental factors. Personal factors were found to exert the most decisive influence on enrolment decisions, followed by social and environmental factors. The qualitative analysis further corroborated these patterns and offered additional explanatory depth, particularly by highlighting the roles of individual interests and electronic word of mouth (eWOM). Collectively, the findings indicate the increasing salience of digitally mediated peer influence in higher education decision-making. On this basis, an integrative framework is proposed to explain enrolment decisions in emerging fields by linking individual dispositions with contextual determinants. The study contributes to the student enrolment decision-making literature by extending existing accounts to the CCI context. It provides implications for higher education institutions, policymakers and families seeking to strengthen student support, cultivate creative talent and align educational pathways with the development needs of the cultural and creative sector.
AmadorMGCowanRNillesenE (2022) Peer networks and malleability of educational aspirations. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2209.08340.
3.
ASEAN (2025) ASEAN Creative Economy Sustainability Framework (Adopted by the 46th ASEAN Summit).
4.
BeckerGS (1964) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. University of Chicago Press Chicago.
5.
BhattacharjeeRRamkumarA (2025) Effect of big five personality dimensions on the academic performance of college students. Frontiers in Psychology16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1490427
CheahJ-HMagnoFCassiaF (2023) Reviewing the SmartPLS 4 software: the latest features and enhancements. Journal of Marketing Analytics12: 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-023-00266-y
9.
ChhorCSekVNorngR, et al. (2024) Factors influencing students’ enrollment decisions in higher education institutions: a case study of the national university of Battambang. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning2(6): 169–186. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(6).10
10.
CortesSAgeroAAgravanteE, et al. (2023) Factors influencing students’ intention to enroll in Bachelor of Science in Biology: a structural equation modelling approach. Cogent Education10: 2273635. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2273635
11.
CreamerEG (2017) An Introduction to Fully Integrated Mixed Methods Research. Sage publications.
12.
CreswellJWClarkVLP (2017) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage publications.
13.
DaroliaRKoedelCMainJ, et al. (2019) High school course access and postsecondary STEM enrollment and attainment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis42: 016237371987692. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719876923
14.
ErsoyFSpeerJD (2025) Opening the black box of college major choice: evidence from an information intervention. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization231: 106800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106800
15.
EscaithH (2022) Creative industry 4.0: towards a new globalised creative economy (an overview). SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4104398
16.
FengT-TYangL-F (2024) Sustainable development of the cultural and creative industries in the post-pandemic era: a case study of the animation industry in China. Sustainability16: 9796. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229796
17.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
18.
GiaoH (2022) Recognizing factors affecting the choosing intention to study at Saigon University. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4196335
19.
GilleMMoulignierRKövesiK (2022) Understanding the factors influencing students’ choice of engineering school. European Journal of Engineering Education47(2): 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1993795
20.
GlasserW (1999) Choice Theory: A New Psychology of Personal Freedom. HarperPerennial.
HairJAlamerA (2022) Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics1: 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
23.
HairJHultGTMRingleCM, et al. (2021) Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Springer Nature.
24.
HeathcoteDSavageSHosseinian-FarA (2020) Factors affecting university choice behaviour in the UK higher education. Education Sciences10(8): 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080199
25.
HESA (2025) Higher Education Student Statistics: UK 2023/24 Released. HESA.
26.
HollandJ (1997) Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments. 3rd edition. Psychological Assessment Resources.
27.
HowkinsJ (2002) The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from Ideas. Penguin UK.
28.
KocakOAkNErdemS, et al. (2021) The role of family influence and academic satisfaction on career decision-making self-efficacy and happiness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18: 5919. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115919
29.
LentRBrownSHackettG (1994) Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior45: 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
30.
LuanNTriNNguyenH, et al. (2023) Factors affecting students’ career choice in economics majors in the COVID-19 post-pandemic period: a case study of FPT University, Vietnam. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge8: 100338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100338
31.
MainJGriffithAXuX, et al. (2021) Choosing an engineering major: a conceptual model of student pathways into engineering. Journal of Engineering Education111: 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20429
MishraNIsmailAAl-hadabiS (2017) A major choice: exploring the factors influencing undergraduate choices of communication major. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives14: 54–72. https://doi.org/10.18538/lthe.v14.n2.292
34.
MonttG (2015) The Causes and Consequences of field-of-study Mismatch: An Analysis Using PIAAC.
35.
MtemeriJ (2020) Peer pressure as a predictor of career decision-making among high school students in Midlands Province, Zimbabwe. Global Journal of Guidance and Counselling in Schools: Current Perspectives10(3): 120–131. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjgc.v10i3.4898
36.
OakleyKO’BrienD (2015) Cultural Value and Inequality: A Critical Literature Review.
37.
RyanRMDeciEL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist55(1): 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
38.
SalvadorEComunianR (2024) Why and how higher education is so important for cultural and creative industries’ sustainable development?Industry and Higher Education38: 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222231219250
39.
ScottJ (2000) Rational choice theory. Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present129: 126–138.
40.
TikhomirovaTMalykhAMalykhS (2020) Predicting academic achievement with cognitive abilities: cross-sectional study across school education. Behavioral Sciences10(10): 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10100158
41.
TradeUN (2024) Advancing the Measurement of the Creative Economy: A Revised Framework for Creative Industries and Trade. United Nations.
VerbreeA-RMaasLHornstraL, et al. (2021) Personality predicts academic achievement in higher education: differences by academic field of study?Learning and Individual Differences92: 102081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102081
47.
WangHLiuYWangZ, et al. (2023) The influences of the big five personality traits on academic achievements: chain mediating effect based on major identity and self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology14: 1065554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1065554
48.
WigfieldAEcclesJ (2000) Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology25: 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
