This study examines whether organizations with significant pay gaps along one dimension (gender, migration status, class, etc.) tend to exhibit similarly high inequalities along other dimensions, or whether there is a trade-off between inequality dimensions. Using French administrative data, it estimates correlations between class, gender and migrant workplace earnings gaps, and studies how these gaps also relate to a fourth measure of intra-categorical inequality. To ensure robust results, this article introduces innovative methods to address measurement biases that may distort the relationship between earnings gaps. It establishes three key patterns. First, the gender gap is higher in more unequal workplaces. Second, the migrant gap is higher in more equal workplaces. Third, gender and migrant earnings gaps are negatively correlated within workplaces. These results suggest that workplace inequality regimes are shaped by both reinforcing and trade-off dynamics. Finally, this article explores factors influencing these patterns and highlights the role of industries.
AbowdJMKramarzFMargolisDN (1999) High wage workers and high wage firms. Econometrica67(2): 251–333.
2.
AckerJ (2006) Inequality regimes: gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society20(4): 441–464.
3.
AignerDJCainGG (1977) Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. ILR Review30(2): 175–187.
4.
AllenJSandersK (2002) Gender gap in earnings at the industry level. European Journal of Women’s Studies9(2): 163–180.
5.
AltonjiJGBlankRM (1999) Race and gender in the labor market. In: AshenfelterOCardD (eds) Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3C. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 3143–3259.
6.
AmableB (2017) Structural Crisis and Institutional Change in Modern Capitalism: French Capitalism in Transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
AndrewsMJGillLSchankT, et al (2008) High wage workers and low wage firms: negative assortative matching or limited mobility bias?Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)171(3): 673–697.
8.
AthariEBrinbaumYLêJ (2019) Le rôle des origines dans la persistance des inégalités d’emploi et de salaire. In: Insee Références: Emploi, chômage, Revenus du travail. Paris: INSEE, 29–46.
9.
Avent-HoltDTomaskovic-DeveyD (2012) Relational inequality: gender earnings inequality in US and Japanese manufacturing plants in the early 1980s. Social Forces91(1): 157–180.
10.
BabetDGodechotOPalladinoMG (2023) In the land of AKM: explaining the dynamics of wage inequality in France. Documents de Travail, 2023/20. Paris: INSEE.
11.
BaronJNBielbyWT (1980) Bringing the firms back in: stratification, segmentation, and the organization of work. American Sociological Review45(5): 737–765.
12.
BatailleP (2018) The French trade union movement and the struggle against racism in the workplace. In: WetsJ (ed.) Cultural Diversity in Trade Unions: A Challenge to Class Identity?London; New York, NY: Routledge, 227–238.
13.
BaxterJWrightEO (2000) The glass ceiling hypothesis: a comparative study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Gender & Society14(2): 275–294.
14.
BoltanskiL (1982) Les cadres. La formation d’un groupe social. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
15.
BrowneIMisraJ (2003) The intersection of gender and race in the labor market. Annual Review of Sociology29(1): 487–513.
16.
CastillaEJ (2008) Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. American Journal of Sociology113(6): 1479–1526.
17.
CharlesMBradleyK (2009) Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology114(4): 924–976.
18.
ChoSCrenshawKWMcCallL (2013) Toward a field of intersectionality studies: theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society38(4): 785–810.
19.
ConnellyBLTihanyiLCrookTR, et al (2014) Tournament theory: thirty years of contests and competitions. Journal of Management40(1): 16–47.
20.
CoudinÉMaillardSTôM (2018) Family, firms and the gender wage gap in France. Documents de Travail de la DSDS, F1805. Paris: INSEE.
21.
CrenshawK (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum1989(1): 139–167.
22.
DesjonquèresALhommeauBNiangM, et al (2021) Quels sont les métiers des immigrés?Dares Analyses36: 1–8.
23.
DobbinFSchrageDKalevA (2015) Rage against the iron cage: the varied effects of bureaucratic personnel reforms on diversity. American Sociological Review80(5): 1014–1044.
24.
EaglyAHKarauSJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review109(3): 573–598.
25.
EriksonRGoldthorpeJH (1992) The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
FougèreDPougetJ (2003) Les déterminants économiques de l’entrée dans la fonction publique. Économie et statistique369(1): 15–48.
27.
GreenmanEXieY (2008) Double jeopardy? The interaction of gender and race on earnings in the United States. Social Forces86(3): 1217–1244.
28.
GrodskyEPagerD (2001) The structure of disadvantage: individual and occupational determinants of the black-white wage gap. American Sociological Review66(4): 542–567.
29.
HedströmP (1991) Organizational differentiation and earnings dispersion. American Journal of Sociology97(1): 96–113.
30.
HermansenASPennerABozaI, et al (2025) Immigrant–native pay gap driven by lack of access to high-paying jobs. Nature. Epub ahead of print 16 July 2025. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09259-6.
31.
HolmströmB (1979) Moral hazard and observability. The Bell Journal of Economics10(1): 74–91.
32.
INSEE (2023) Immigrés et descendants d’immigrés en France: édition 2023. Paris: INSEE.
33.
KvandeERasmussenB (1994) Men in male-dominated organizations and their encounter with women intruders. Scandinavian Journal of Management10(2): 163–173.
34.
LazearEPRosenS (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy89(5): 841–864.
35.
LinK-HNeelyMT (2017) Gender, parental status, and the wage premium in finance. Social Currents4(6): 535–555.
36.
McCallL (2001) Complex Inequality: Gender, Class and Race in the New Economy. New York, NY; London: Routledge.
37.
McCallL (2005) The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society30(3): 1771–1800.
38.
McGuireGM (2002) Gender, race, and the shadow structure: a study of informal networks and inequality in a work organization. Gender & Society16(3): 303–322.
39.
MelzerSMTomaskovic-DeveyDSchunckR, et al (2018) A relational inequality approach to first- and second-generation immigrant earnings in German workplaces. Social Forces97(1): 91–128.
40.
MeursDPoraP (2019) Gender equality on the labour market in France: a slow convergence hampered by motherhood. Economie et Statistique510(1): 109–130.
41.
MilgromPRobertsJ (1988) An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. American Journal of Sociology94: S154–S179.
42.
NoirielG (1988) Le Creuset français. Paris: Seuil.
43.
OECD (2008) Jobs for Immigrants. Volume 2: Labour Market Integration in Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Portugal. Paris: OECD Publishing.
44.
PennerAMSapersteinA (2013) Engendering racial perceptions: an intersectional analysis of how social status shapes race. Gender & Society27(3): 319–344.
45.
PennerAMPetersenTHermansenAS, et al (2023) Within-job gender pay inequality in 15 countries. Nature Human Behaviour7(2): 184–189.
46.
QuillianLHeathAPagerD, et al (2019) Do some countries discriminate more than others? Evidence from 97 field experiments of racial discrimination in hiring. Sociological Science6(18): 467–496.
47.
RoscignoVJ (2019) Discrimination, sexual harassment, and the impact of workplace power. Socius5: 2378023119853894.
48.
RoscignoVJHodsonRLopezSH (2009) Workplace incivilities: the role of interest conflicts, social closure and organizational chaos. Work, Employment and Society23(4): 747–773.
49.
RothLM (2006) Selling Women Short: Gender and Money on Wall Street. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
SafiM (2017) Promoting diversity in French workplaces: targeting and signaling ethnoracial origin in a colorblind context. Socius3: 2378023117728834.
51.
SafiMSimonP (2013) Les discriminations ethniques et raciales dans l’enquête ‘Trajectoires et Origines’. Economie et Statistique/Economics and Statistics464(1): 245–275.
52.
TillyC (1998) Durable Inequality. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
53.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDAvent-HoltD (2019) Relational Inequalities: An Organizational Approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
54.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDHällstenMAvent-HoltD (2015) Where do immigrants fare worse? Modeling workplace wage gap variation with longitudinal employer-employee data. American Journal of Sociology120(4): 1095–1143.
55.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDRaineyAAvent-HoltD, et al (2020) Rising between-workplace inequalities in high-income countries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America117(17): 9277–9283.
56.
TreimanDJ (1977) Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
57.
WeedenKAGruskyDB (2005) The case for a new class map. American Journal of Sociology111(1): 141–212.
58.
WilliamsKYO’ReillyCAIII (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior20: 77–140.
59.
WoodhamsCLuptonBCowlingM (2015) The snowballing penalty effect: multiple disadvantage and pay. British Journal of Management26(1): 63–77.
60.
WoolridgeJM (2013) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Mason, IA: South Western, Cengange Learning.
61.
WrightEO (1997) Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
ZhouXWodtkeGT (2019) Income stratification among occupational classes in the United States. Social Forces97(3): 945–972.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
