Over the last two decades a vibrant body of research committed to investigating the complex inter-relationships between ‘the social’ and ‘the spatial’ has gathered momentum within sociology and the social sciences more generally. Focusing on young people, this article seeks to develop further insights regarding the sociology of place using the spatial visualization technique of mental mapping as part of a mixed-methods approach. Its main contribution is to develop a more nuanced understanding of young people’s localized cognitive spaces and associated socio-spatial influences in three deprived urban areas in Hull, Walsall and Wolverhampton. In this context, the article explores the role of place in shaping young people’s social networks, identities and aspirations regarding employment and highlights the implications of these for future research.
AndersonJJonesK (2009) The difference that place makes to methodology: uncovering the ‘lived space’ of young people’s spatial practices. Children’s Geographies7(3): 291–303.
2.
BagnoliA (2012) Making sense of mixed method narratives: young people’s identities, life-plans, and time orientations. In: HeathSWalkerC (eds) Innovations in Youth Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 77–100.
3.
BlochA (2013) The labour market experiences and strategies of young undocumented migrants. Work, Employment and Society27(2): 272–87.
4.
BrownAPowellS (2012) Multiple facets of people and place: exploring youth identity and aspirations in Madurai, South India. In: HeathSWalkerC (eds) Innovations in Youth Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 121–42.
5.
BrymanA (2003) Quantitative and qualitative research: further reflections on their integration. In: BrannenJ (ed.) Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 57–78.
6.
CastreeNCoeNMWardKSamersM (2004) Spaces of Work. London: SAGE.
7.
CeleS (2013) Performing the political through public space: teenage girls’ everyday use of a city park. Space and Polity17(1): 74–87.
8.
CollingeC (2005) The difference between society and space: nested scales and the returns of spatial fetishism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space23(2): 189–206.
9.
CresswellT (2004) Place: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
DallagoLPerkinsDDSantinelloMBoyceWMolchoMMorganA (2009) Adolescent place attachment, social capital, and perceived safety: a comparison of 13 countries. American Journal of Community Psychology44(1/2): 148–60.
11.
DennisSF (2006) Prospects for qualitative GIS at the intersection of youth development and participatory urban planning. Environment and Planning A38(11): 2039–54.
12.
DownsRMSteaD (1977) Maps in Minds: Reflections on Cognitive Mapping. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
13.
EscottK (2012) Young women on the margins of the labour market. Work, Employment and Society26(3): 412–28.
14.
FlintC (2011) Introduction: geographic perspectives on civil wars. International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations37(4): 466–8.
15.
GierynTF (2000) A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology26: 463–96.
16.
GoodchildB (1974) Class differences in environmental perception: an exploratory study. Urban Studies11(2): 157–69.
17.
GouldPRWhiteRR (1968) The mental maps of British school leavers. Regional Studies2(2): 161–82.
GranovetterM (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–80.
20.
GreenAEWhiteRJ (2007) Attachment to Place: Social Networks, Mobility and Prospects of Young People. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
21.
GreenAEShuttleworthILaveryS (2005) Young people, job search and labour markets: the example of Belfast. Urban Studies42(2): 301–24.
22.
HeathSWalkerC (2012) (eds) Innovations in Youth Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
HerodARainnieAMcGrath-ChampS (2007) Working space: why incorporating the geographical is central to theorizing work and employment practices. Work, Employment and Society21(2): 247–64.
24.
HollandJReynoldsTWellerS (2007) Transitions, networks and communities: the significance of social capital in the lives of children and young people. Journal of Youth Studies10(1): 97–116.
25.
LeeR (2002) Nice maps, shame about the theory? Thinking geographically about the economic. Progress in Human Geography26(3): 333–55.
26.
MatthewsRPendakurRYoungN (2009) Social capital, labour markets, and job-finding in urban and rural regions: comparing paths to employment in prosperous cities and stressed rural communities in Canada. The Sociological Review57(2): 306–30.
27.
MorrowVM (2010) ‘Dirty looks’ and ‘trampy places’ in young people’s accounts of community and neighbourhood: implications for health inequalities. Critical Public Health10(2): 141–52.
28.
NoyesA (2004) Video diary: a method for exploring learning dispositions. Cambridge Journal of Education34(2): 193–209.
29.
PickeringJKintreaKBannisterJ (2012) Invisible walls and visible youth: territoriality among young people in British cities. Urban Studies49(5): 945–60.
30.
PutnamR (1995) Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics28(4): 664–83.
31.
RalphsRMedinaJAldridgeJ (2009) Who needs enemies with friends like these? The importance of place for young people living in known gang areas. Journal of Youth Studies12(5): 483–500.
32.
RobertsS (2011) Beyond ‘NEET’ and ‘tidy’ pathways: considering the ‘missing middle’ of youth transition studies. Journal of Youth Studies14(1): 21–39.
33.
SchaeferN (2012) Using video in a participatory, multi-method project on young people’s everyday lives in rural East Germany: a critical reflection. In: HeathSWalkerC (eds) Innovations in Youth Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 143–60.
34.
SoiniK (2001) Exploring human dimensions of multifunctional landscapes through mapping and map-making. Landscape and Urban Planning25(3): 225–39.
35.
TuanYF (1977) Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
36.
WardK (2007) Thinking geographically about work, employment and society. Work, Employment and Society21(2): 265–76.
37.
WhiteR (1996) No-go in the fortress city: young people, inequality and space. Urban Policy and Research14(1): 37–50.
38.
WhiteRJGreenAE (2012) The use of mental maps in youth research: some evidence from research exploring young people’s awareness of and attachment to place. In: HeathSWalkerC (eds) Innovations in Youth Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 58–76.
39.
YoungLBarrettH (2001) Adapting visual methods: action research with Kampala street children. Area33(2): 141–152.
