This article investigates how employers value recommendations from the public employment service (PES) compared to recommendations from a social contact for their hiring decision. The importance of social contacts in the labour market creates inequality by putting those with a weak social network at a disadvantage. It is therefore important to know if public agencies acting as labour market intermediaries (LMI) can compensate for this disadvantage. This question is investigated by means of a factorial survey experiment conducted among Swiss human resources professionals. The results demonstrate that employers value recommendations from social contacts as well as the PES. However, the latter is not able to fully substitute for the effect of social networks.
AuerDBonoliGFossatiF, et al. (2019) The matching hierarchies’ model: Evidence from a survey experiment on employers’ hiring intent of immigrant applicants. International Migration Review53(1): 90–121.
2.
AuspurgKHinzT (2015) Factorial Survey Experiments. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
3.
AuspurgKHinzTLiebigS, et al. (2014) The factorial survey as a method for measuring sensitive issues. In: EngelUJannBLynnP, et al. (eds) Improving Survey Methods: Lessons from Recent Research. New York: Routledge, 137–149.
4.
BehnckeSFroelichMLechnerM (2008) Public employment services and employers: How important are networks with firms?Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft1: 151–178.
5.
BehtouiANeergaardA (2010) Social capital and wage disadvantages among immigrant workers. Work, Employment and Society24(4): 761–779.
6.
BellisASigalaMDewsonS (2011) Employer Engagement and Jobcentre Plus. London: Department for Work and Pensions.
7.
BonetRCappelliPHamoriM (2013) Labor market intermediaries and the new paradigm for human resources. The Academy of Management Annals7(1): 341–392.
8.
BonoliG (2013) The Origins of Active Social Policy. Labour Market and Childcare Policies in a Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
BonoliGHinrichsK (2012) Statistical discrimination and employers’ recruitment. European Societies14(3): 338–361.
10.
BonoliGLiechtiF (2018) Good intentions and Matthew effects: Access biases in participation in active labour market policies. Journal of European Public Policy25(6): 894–911.
11.
BonoliGTurtschiN (2015) Inequality in social capital and labour market re-entry among unemployed people. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility42: 87–95.
12.
BrekkeIMastekaasaA (2008) Highly educated immigrants in the Norwegian labour market: Permanent disadvantage?Work, Employment and Society22(3): 507–526.
13.
BuntKMcAndrewFKuechelA (2007) Jobcentre Plus Employer (Market View) Survey 2006–07. Leeds: Department for Work and Pensions.
14.
BurtRS (1992) Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
CastillaEJLanGJRissingBA (2013) Social networks and employment: Mechanisms (part 1). Sociology Compass7(12): 1013–1026.
16.
DamelangAAbrahamM (2016) You can take some of it with you!Zeitschrift für Soziologie45(2): 91–106.
17.
Di StasioVGërxhaniK (2015) Employers’ social contacts and their hiring behavior in a factorial survey. Social Science Research51: 93–107.
18.
DuellNTergeistPBazantU, et al. (2010) Activation policies in Switzerland. OECD Social Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 112. Paris: OECD.
FernandezRM (2010) Creating connections for the disadvantaged: Networks and labor market intermediaries at the hiring interface. MIT Sloan School Working Paper No. 4778-10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management.
22.
FernandezRMCastillaEJMooreP (2000) Social capital at work: Networks and employment at a phone center. American Journal of Sociology105(5): 1288–1356.
23.
FinnD (2005) The role of contracts and the private sector in delivering Britain’s ‘employment first’ welfare state. In: SolEWesterveldM (eds) Contractualism in Employment Services: A New Form of Welfare State Governance. The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 101–117.
24.
GoreT (2005) Extending employability or solving employers’ recruitment problems? Demand-led approaches as an instrument of labour market policy. Urban Studies42(2): 341–353.
25.
GranovetterMS (1995) Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
26.
HainmuellerJHangartnerDYamamotoT (2015) Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behaviour. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America112(8): 2395–2400.
27.
HarsløfI (2006) The impact of welfare and labour market institutions on informal recruitment in European youth labour markets. European Societies8(4): 555–576.
28.
HolzerHJ (2009) Workforce development as an antipoverty strategy: What do we know? What should we do?Focus26(2): 62–68.
29.
IngoldJValizadeD (2017) Employers’ recruitment of disadvantaged groups: Exploring the effect of active labour market programme agencies as labour market intermediaries. Human Resource Management Journal27(4): 530–547.
30.
JannB (2013) Predictive margins and marginal effects in Stata. In: 11th Stata Users Group meeting, 7 June 2013, Potsdam.
31.
KaltenbornBKapsP (2013) Steuerung der öffentlichen Arbeitsvermittlung. SECO Publikationen Arbeitsmarkpolitik35: 1–544.
32.
KingstonGMcGinnityFO’ConnellPJ (2015) Discrimination in the labour market: Nationality, ethnicity and the recession. Work, Employment and Society29(2): 213–232.
33.
LarsenCAVesanP (2012) Why public employment services always fail. Double-sided asymmetric information and the placement of low-skilled workers in six European countries. Public Administration90(2): 466–479.
34.
LeeW (2009) Private deception and the rise of public employment offices in the United States, 1890–1930. In: AutorDH (ed.) Studies of Labor Market Intermediation. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 155–182.
35.
LevelsMvan der VeldenRDi StasioV (2014) From school to fitting work: How education-to-job matching of European school leavers is related to educational system characteristics. Acta Sociologica57(4): 341–361.
36.
LiechtiFFossatiFBonoliG, et al. (2017) The signalling value of labour market programmes. European Sociological Review33(2): 257–274.
37.
McGinnityFLunnPD (2011) Measuring discrimination facing ethnic minority job applicants: An Irish experiment. Work, Employment and Society25(4): 693–708.
38.
MarsdenPVGormanEH (2001) Social networks, job changes, and recruitment. In: BergIKallebergAL (eds) Sourcebook of Labour Markets: Evolving Structures and Processes. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 467–502.
39.
MüllerWShavitY (1998) The institutional embeddedness of the stratification process. In: MüllerWShavitY (eds) From School to Work: A Comparative Study of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1–48.
40.
NeckermanKMFernandezRM (2003) Keeping a job: Network hiring and turnover in a retail bank. The Governance of Relations in Markets and Organizations20: 299–318.
41.
OeschDvon OwA (2017) Social networks and job access for the unemployed: Work ties for the upper-middle class, communal ties for the working class. European Sociological Review33(2): 275–291.
42.
Rabe-HeskethSSkrondalA (2012) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
43.
RubineauBFernandezRM (2015) How do labor market networks work? In: ScottRABuchmannMCKosslynS (eds) Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 1–15.
44.
SolE (2005) Contracting out of public employment systems from a governance perspective. In: BredgaardTLarsenF (eds) Employment Policy from Different Angles. Copenhagen: DJOF Publishing, 155–174.
45.
SpenceM (1973) Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics87(3): 355–374.
46.
State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) (2016) Die Lage Auf Dem Arbeitsmarkt Juni 2016. Neuchâtel: SECO.
47.
Van BerkelRIngoldJMcGurkP, et al. (2017) Editorial introduction: An introduction to employer engagement in the field of HRM. Blending social policy and HRM research in promoting vulnerable groups’ labour market participation. Human Resource Management Journal27(4): 503–513.
48.
Van der AaPvan BerkelR (2014) Innovating job activation by involving employers. International Social Security Review67(2): 11–27.
49.
WiborgØNMøbergRJ (2010) Social origin and the risks of disadvantage in Denmark and Norway: The early life course of young adults. Work, Employment and Society24(1): 105–125.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
