Where popular contention in China is concerned, third parties are not merely supporters of protesters but also allies of the state. Through quantitative and qualitative methods, this article uses an actor-centred perspective to explore the dual role of Chinese lawyers in state dispute resolution projects. When providing legal counselling services to the public, lawyers adopt selective strategies and channel non-political cases into legal channels while keeping political cases within the political arena. When handling social disputes for the government, however, they apply professional diagnoses and legal persuasion, and intervene through mediation and negotiation. Three factors constrain the effectiveness of Chinese lawyers during dispute resolution. These are the limited access to cases, the dilemmas inherent in acting simultaneously both as a third party and as a state agent, and the restricted influence of lawyers over the final resolution of social disputes. This article argues that the selective responses of Chinese lawyers during legal counselling and strategic defence of state power in dispute resolution make them a governance tool for stability maintenance. Their participation contributes more to legal repression than to legal development in contemporary China.
CaiYongshun (2010) Collective Resistance in China: Why Popular Protests Succeed or Fail. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
CaiYongshunYangSongcai (2005) State power and unbalanced legal development in China. Journal of Contemporary China14(42): 117–34.
4.
ChenJidongPanJenniferXuYiqing (2016) Sources of authoritarian responsiveness: A field experiment in China. American Journal of Political Science60(2): 383–400.
5.
ChenXi (2017) Origins of informal coercion in China. Politics & Society45(1): 67–89.
6.
DengYanhuaO’BrienKevin J. (2013) Relational repression in China: Using social ties to demobilize protesters. China Quarterly215: 533–52.
7.
DistelhorstGregHouYue (2014) Ingroup bias in official behavior: A national field experiment in China. Quarterly Journal of Political Science9(2): 203–30.
8.
FranceschiniIvan (2014) Labour NGOs in China: A real force for political change?China Quarterly218: 474–92.
FuHualing (2014) Human rights lawyering in Chinese courtrooms. Chinese Journal of Comparative Law2(2): 270–88.
11.
FuHualingCullenRichard (2008) Weiquan (rights protection) lawyering in an authoritarian state: Building a culture of public-interest lawyering. China Journal59: 111–27.
12.
FuHualingCullenRichard (2011) Climbing the weiquan ladder: A radicalizing process for rights-protection lawyers. China Quarterly205: 40–59.
13.
GivensJohn Wagner (2013) Sleeping with dragons?: Politically embedded lawyers suing the Chinese state. Wisconsin International Law Journal31(3): 734–74.
14.
HoPeter (2001) Greening without conflict?: Environmentalism, NGOs and civil society in China. Development and Change32(5): 893–921.
15.
HoPeterEdmondsRichard Louis (2007) Perspectives of time and change: Rethinking embedded environmental activism in China. China Information21(2): 331–44.
16.
HowellJude (2015) Shall we dance?: Welfarist incorporation and the politics of state–labour NGO relations. China Quarterly223: 702–23.
17.
HsuCarolyn (2010) Beyond civil society: An organizational perspective on state–NGO relations in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Civil Society6(3): 259–77.
18.
HuJierenTuYueWuTong (2018) Selective intervention in dispute resolution: Local government and community governance in China. Journal of Contemporary China27(111): 423–39.
19.
HuJierenWuTongFeiJingyan (2018) Flexible governance in China: Affective care, petition social workers, and multi-pronged means of dispute resolution. Asian Survey58(4): 679–703.
20.
KangXiaoguang 康晓光HanHeng 韩恒LuXianying 卢宪英 (2010) 行政吸纳社会: 当代中国大陆国家与社会关系研究 (Administration absorbing society: Study of state–society relations in contemporary China). Singapore: 八方文化创作室 (Global Publishing).
21.
KingGaryPanJenniferRobertsMargaret E. (2013) How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review107(2): 326–43.
LeeChing KwanZhangYonghong (2013) The power of instability: Unraveling the microfoundations of bargained authoritarianism in China. American Journal of Sociology118(6): 1475–508.
24.
LeeTang LayFrancisRegan (2009) Why develop and support women’s organizations in providing legal aid in China?: Women’s rights, women’s organizations and legal aid in China. Journal of Contemporary China18(61): 541–65.
25.
LiebmanBenjamin L. (1999) Legal aid and public interest law in China. Texas International Law Journal34(2): 211–86.
26.
LiebmanBenjamin L. (2005) Watchdog or demagogue?: The media in the Chinese legal system. Columbia Law Review105(1): 1–157.
27.
LiuChunrong (2017) Beyond coercion: The new politics of conflict processing in China. Chinese Political Science Review2(2): 221–36.
28.
LiuJun (2015) Mobile activism and contentious politics in contemporary China. In: ChenWenhongReeseStephen D. (eds) Networked China: Global Dynamics of Digital Media and Civic Engagement: New Agendas in Communication. Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge, 97–113.
29.
LiuLawrenceSternRachel (2019) State-adjacent lawyering: How Chinese lawyers participate in political life. Paper presented at Wisconsin International Law Journal Annual Symposium ‘Lawyers and Lawyering in China and Russia: Common Challenges’, Madison, USA, 5 April.
30.
LiuSida 刘思达 (2008) 如何研究中国律师业?: 从2007年中国律师问卷调查谈起 (How to study the Chinese legal profession?: Starting the discussion on the 2007 Chinese lawyers’ questionnaire survey). 中国律师 (Chinese lawyer), no. 8: 98–100.
31.
LiuSida (2011) Lawyers, state officials and significant others: Symbiotic exchange in the Chinese legal services market. China Quarterly206: 276–93.
32.
LiuSida 刘思达 (2011) 割据的逻辑: 中国法律服务市场的生态分析 (The logic of fragmentation: An ecological analysis of the Chinese legal services market). Shanghai: 上海三联书店 (Shanghai joint publishing).
33.
LiuSida (2017) Overlapping ecologies: Professions and development in the rise of legal services in China. Sociology of Development3(3): 212–31.
34.
LiuSidaHallidayTerence C. (2008) Dancing handcuffed in the minefield: Survival strategies of defense lawyers in China’s criminal justice system. Center on Law and Globalization Research Paper no. 08-04. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1269536, accessed 21 September 2019.
35.
LiuSidaHallidayTerence C. (2016) Criminal Defense in China: The Politics of Lawyers at Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
LorentzenPeter L. (2013) Regularizing rioting: Permitting public protest in an authoritarian regime. Quarterly Journal of Political Science8(2): 127–58.
37.
MacKinnonRebecca (2012) Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom. New York: Basic Books.
38.
MichelsonEthan (2006) The practice of law as an obstacle to justice: Chinese lawyers at work. Law & Society Review40(1): 1–38.
39.
MichelsonEthan (2007) Climbing the dispute pagoda: Grievances and appeals to the official justice system in rural China. American Sociological Review72(3): 459–85.
40.
MichelsonEthan (2007) Lawyers, political embeddedness, and institutional continuity in China’s transition from socialism. American Journal of Sociology113(2): 352–414.
41.
MichelsonEthan (2008) Dear lawyer Bao: Everyday problems, legal advice, and state power in China. Social Problems55(1): 43–71.
42.
MichelsonEthanLiuSida (2010) What do Chinese lawyers want?: Political values and legal practice. In: LiCheng (ed.) China’s Emerging Middle Class: Beyond Economic Transformation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 310–33.
43.
O’BrienKevin J.DengYanhua (2017) Preventing protest one person at a time: Psychological coercion and relational repression in China. China Review17(2): 179–201.
44.
O’BrienKevin J.LiLianjiang (2006) Rightful Resistance in Rural China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
OngLynette H. (2018) Thugs and outsourcing of state repression in China. China Journal80: 94–110.
46.
OngLynette H. (2019) Engaging huangniu (brokers): Commodification of state-society bargaining in China. Journal of Contemporary China28(116): 293–307.
中央政法委关于建立律师参与化解和代理涉法涉诉信访案件制度的意见 (Opinions of the Central Political and Legal Affairs Commission on establishing the system for lawyers to participate in dispute resolution and acting as counsel for clients in petition cases involving legal proceedings) (2015) 9 November. http://big5.gov.cn/gate/big5/www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-11/09/content_2963034.htm, accessed 10 July 2018.
49.
司法部,国家信访局关于进一步加强律师参与涉法信访工作的意见 (Opinions of the Ministry of Justice and National Public Complaints and Proposals Administration on further promoting lawyers’ participation in law-related petition work) (2004) 9 October. https://www.lawxp.com/statute/s1056715.html, accessed 10 July 2018.
50.
PilsEva (2006) Asking the tiger for his skin: Rights activism in China. Fordham International Law Journal30(4): 1209–87.
51.
省级一村(社区)一法律顾问补助资金绩效自评报告 (Provincial-level performance assessment report on financial compensation for the one-village (community) one-legal counsel project) (2017) 24 August. http://sft.gd.gov.cn/sfw/gov_gk/czya/content/post_1134575.html, accessed 29 August 2018.
52.
全国律协关于推动律师为政府投资重大建设项目提供法律服务的调研报告 (Research report of the All China Lawyers Association on promoting lawyers’ participation in the provision of legal services to government-invested major construction projects) (2013) 16 August. http://www.acla.org.cn/article/page/detailById/17305, accessed 2 August 2017.
53.
RooijBenjamin van (2010) The people vs. pollution: Understanding citizen action against pollution in China. Journal of Contemporary China19(63): 55–77.
54.
司法部关于律师担任政府法律顾问的若干规定 (Several provisions of the Ministry of Justice on lawyers serving as government legal counsels [issued by order no. 7 of the Ministry of Justice on 23 December 1989]) (n.d.) http://www.pkulaw.cn/fulltext_form.aspx?Db=qikan&gid=1510039910, accessed 10 July 2018.
SpiresAnthony J. (2011) Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: Understanding the survival of China’s grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology117(1): 1–45.
57.
SternRachel E. (2013) Environmental Litigation in China: A Study in Political Ambivalence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
SternRachel E.O’BrienKevin J. (2012) Politics at the boundary: Mixed signals and the Chinese state. Modern China38(2): 174–98.
59.
SuZhengMengTianguang (2016) Selective responsiveness: Online public demands and government responsiveness in authoritarian China. Social Science Research59: 52–67.
60.
律师担任政府法律顾问经验交流会综述 (Summary of the conference for exchanging experiences on the role of lawyers as government legal counsels) (1990) 中国律师 (Chinese lawyer), no. 1: 22.
61.
WuTong 吴同ChenBeili 陈蓓丽 (2015) 专业社会工作介入信访的运作机制以及发展困境 – 以上海市专业社工介入信访C项目的个案服务为例 (Operation mechanisms and predicaments of the intervention of professional social work in the petition system: A case analysis of C project in Shanghai). 华东师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版) (Journal of East China Normal University (humanities and social sciences edition)), no. 2: 92–100.
62.
YanXiaojun 閻小駿 (2017) 中國何以穩定: 來自田野的觀察與思考 (Why is China stable?: Stories from the grass roots). Hong Kong: 三聯書店 (Joint publishing).
63.
YingXing (2010) Barefoot lawyers and rural conflicts. In: HsingYou-tienLeeChing Kwan (eds) Reclaiming Chinese Society: The New Social Activism. Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge, 64–82.
64.
ZhangYujie 张玉杰 (1995) 青岛律师主动参与政府信访工作 (Lawyers in Qingdao participated in government petition work). 中国律师 (Chinese lawyer), no. 8: 45.
65.
24 位律师国家信访局坐班: 他们都干什么? (24 lawyers work in the National Public Complaints and Proposals Administration: What do they do?) (2016) 16 September. http://www.zaobao.com/wencui/social/story20160916-667045, accessed 2 December 2018.
