Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 13–15 (historically called mild TBI [mTBI]) commonly experience changes in cognitive functioning, including processing speed, memory, and executive functioning. In a prospective sample (N = 523) of individuals of European descent who had been treated in a U.S. level 1 trauma center for mTBI, we examined the prognostic value of four polygenic risk scores (PRS) for cognitive outcomes at 6-months postinjury. To estimate the impact of mTBI on cognition, primary cognitive outcomes were scaled as z-scores reflecting changes in performance relative to predicted preinjury performance. The PRS examined were previously developed and validated to predict cognition-related outcomes of educational attainment (Education-PRS), intelligence (Intelligence-PRS), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD-mild traumatic brain injury (APOE)-PRS and AD + APOE-PRS). Both the Education-PRS and Intelligence-PRS displayed bivariate associations with all four cognitive outcomes (β = 0.19–0.32), whereas neither Alzheimer’s disease PRS was significantly associated with any outcome. After controlling for other factors known to predict cognitive outcomes of TBI (e.g., sex, education, mTBI severity defined by a combination of Glasgow Coma Scale scores and the presence/absence of acute intracranial findings on clinical neuroimaging), the Education-PRS and Intelligence-PRS remained independently predictive of verbal episodic memory (β = 0.10–0.16), whereas their associations with processing speed and executive functioning were mostly nonsignificant and were mediated through educational attainment. Looking across primary z-score and secondary raw score outcomes, cognitive outcomes 6 months post-mTBI were good on average, and PRS made small independent contributions to outcome prediction. The mediation model findings may support theories of cognitive reserve, which propose that individuals with stronger preinjury cognitive processing abilities (often estimated by educational history) can better compensate for TBI. Moreover, findings indicate that PRS may contribute modestly to multivariable models predicting cognitive function after TBI.
DewanMC, RattaniA, GuptaS, et al.Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg2019;130(4):1080–1097; doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352
2.
RabinowitzAR, LevinHS. Cognitive sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Psychiatr Clin North Am2014;37(1):1–11; doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2013.11.004
3.
ManleyGT, Dams-O’ConnorK, AloscoML,et al.; NIH-NINDS TBI Classification and Nomenclature Initiative. A new characterisation of acute traumatic brain injury: The NIH-NINDS TBI classification and nomenclature initiative. Lancet Neurol2025;24(6):512–523; doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(25)00154-1
4.
HallRC, HallRC, ChapmanMJ. Definition, diagnosis, and forensic implications of postconcussional syndrome. Psychosomatics2005;46(3):195–202; doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.46.3.195
5.
RohlingML, BinderLM, DemakisGJ, et al.A meta-analysis of neuropsychological outcome after mild traumatic brain injury: Re-analyses and reconsiderations of Binder et al. (1997), Frencham et al. (2005), and Pertab et al. (2009). Meta-analysis. Clin Neuropsychol2011;25(4):608–623; doi: 10.1080/13854046.2011.565076
6.
BelangerHG, CurtissG, DemeryJA, et al.Factors moderating neuropsychological outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc2005;11(3):215–227; doi: 10.1017/S1355617705050277
7.
SchretlenDJ, ShapiroAM. A quantitative review of the effects of traumatic brain injury on cognitive functioning. Int Rev Psychiatry2003;15(4):341–349; doi: 10.1080/09540260310001606728
8.
DikmenS, MachamerJ, TemkinN. Mild traumatic brain injury: Longitudinal study of cognition, functional status, and post-traumatic symptoms. J Neurotrauma2017;34(8):1524–1530; doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4618
9.
SchneiderALC, HuieJR, BoscardinWJ,et al.; TRACK-TBI Investigators. Cognitive outcome 1 year after mild traumatic brain injury: Results from the TRACK-TBI study. Neurology2022;98(12):e1248–e1261; doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200041
10.
McInnesK, FriesenCL, MacKenzieDE, et al.Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and chronic cognitive impairment: A scoping review. PLoS One2017;12(4):e0174847; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174847
11.
HumeC, MitraB, WrightB, et al.Cognitive performance in older people after mild traumatic brain injury: Trauma effects and other risk factors. J Int Neuropsychol Soc2023;29(7):651–661; doi: 10.1017/S1355617722000674
12.
DouganBK, HorswillMS, GeffenGM. Athletes’ age, sex, and years of education moderate the acute neuropsychological impact of sports-related concussion: A meta-analysis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc2014;20(1):64–80; doi: 10.1017/S1355617712001464
13.
ChuBC, MillisS, Arango-LasprillaJC, et al.Measuring recovery in new learning and memory following traumatic brain injury: A mixed-effects modeling approach. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol2007;29(6):617–625; doi: 10.1080/13803390600878893
14.
MajumderP, KhandelwalSK, SoodM, et al.A comparative study of cognitive functioning following traumatic brain injury: Significance of initial Glasgow coma scale score to predict cognitive outcome. J Mental Health Hum Behav2015;20(2):59–64.
15.
ReddiS, Thakker-VariaS, AlderJ, et al.Status of precision medicine approaches to traumatic brain injury. Neural Regen Res2022;17(10):2166–2171; doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.335824
16.
AdeyemoA, BalaconisMK, DarnesDR,et al.; Polygenic Risk Score Task Force of the International Common Disease Alliance. Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: Potential benefits, risks and gaps. Nat Med2021;27(11):1876–1884; doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01549-6
17.
MurrayGK, LinT, AustinJ, et al.Could polygenic risk scores be useful in psychiatry?: A review. JAMA Psychiatry2021;78(2):210–219; doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3042
18.
JansenIE, SavageJE, WatanabeK, et al.Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk. Nat Genet2019;51(3):404–413; doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0311-9
19.
JansenIE, SavageJE, WatanabeK, et al.Author correction: Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk. Nat Genet2020;52(3):354; doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0573-x
20.
LeeJJ, WedowR, OkbayA,et al.; Social Science Genetic Association Consortium. Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals. Nat Genet2018;50(8):1112–1121; doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0147-3
21.
SavageJE, JansenPR, StringerS, et al.Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence. Nat Genet2018;50(7):912–919; doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0152-6
22.
AxelrudLK, SantoroML, PineDS, et al.Polygenic risk score for Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for memory performance and hippocampal volumes in early life. Am J Psychiatry2018;175(6):555–563; doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17050529
23.
ChaudhuryS, BrookesKJ, PatelT, et al.Alzheimer’s disease polygenic risk score as a predictor of conversion from mild-cognitive impairment. Transl Psychiatry2019;9(1):154; doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0485-7
24.
HayesJP, LogueMW, SadehN, et al.Mild traumatic brain injury is associated with reduced cortical thickness in those at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Brain2017;140(3):813–825; doi: 10.1093/brain/aww344
25.
BryantAM, RoseNB, TemkinNR,et al.; TRACK-TBI Investigators. Profiles of cognitive functioning at 6 months after traumatic brain injury among patients in level I trauma centers: A TRACK-TBI study. JAMA Netw Open2023;6(12):e2349118; doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49118
26.
DondersJ, StoutJ. The influence of cognitive reserve on recovery from traumatic brain injury. Arch Clin Neuropsychol2019;34(2):206–213; doi: 10.1093/arclin/acy035
27.
FraserEE, DowningMG, BiernackiK, et al.Cognitive reserve and age predict cognitive recovery after mild to severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma2019;36(19):2753–2761; doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6430
28.
KeslerSR, AdamsHF, BlaseyCM, et al.Premorbid intellectual functioning, education, and brain size in traumatic brain injury: An investigation of the cognitive reserve hypothesis. Appl Neuropsychol2003;10(3):153–162; doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN1003_04
29.
StenbergJ, HabergAK, FollestadT, et al.Cognitive reserve moderates cognitive outcome after mild traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2020;101(1):72–80; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.08.477
30.
StewardKA, KennedyR, NovackTA, et al.The role of cognitive reserve in recovery from traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil2018;33(1):E18–E27; doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000325
31.
VenkatesanUM, RabinowitzAR, BernierRA, et al.Cognitive reserve in individuals aging with traumatic brain injury: Independent and interactive effects on cognitive functioning. J Head Trauma Rehabil2022;37(3):E196–E205; doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000697
32.
de Freitas CardosoMG, FaleiroRM, de PaulaJJ, et al.Cognitive impairment following acute mild traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol2019;10:198; doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00198
33.
KayTH, HarringtonDE, AdamsR, et al.Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil1993;8(3):86–87
34.
ChoiSW, MakTS, O’ReillyPF. Tutorial: A guide to performing polygenic risk score analyses. Nat Protoc2020;15(9):2759–2772; doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0353-1
35.
PetersonRE, KuchenbaeckerK, WaltersRK, et al.Genome-wide association studies in ancestrally diverse populations: Opportunities, methods, pitfalls, and recommendations. Cell2019;179(3):589–603; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.051
36.
MathiasJL, DenningtonV, BowdenSC, et al.Community versus orthopaedic controls in traumatic brain injury research: How comparable are they? Brain Inj2013;27(7–8):887–895; doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.793398
37.
KreitzerN, JainS, YoungJS,et al.; Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Investigators. Comparing the quality of life after brain injury-overall scale and satisfaction with life scale as outcome measures for traumatic brain injury research. J Neurotrauma2021;38(23):3352–3363; doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7546
38.
ReyA. L’examen psychologique dans les cas d’encephalopathie traumatique. Arch Psychol (Geneve)1941;28:215–285.
ReitanRM. Trail making test results for normal and brain-damaged children. Percept Mot Skills1971;33(2):575–581; doi: 10.2466/pms.1971.33.2.575
41.
ScottEP, SorrellA, BenitezA. Psychometric properties of the NIH toolbox cognition battery in healthy older adults: Reliability, validity, and agreement with standard neuropsychological tests. J Int Neuropsychol Soc2019;25(8):857–867; doi: 10.1017/S1355617719000614
42.
SteinMB, JainS, ParodiL,et al.; TRACK-TBI Investigators. Polygenic risk for mental disorders as predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder after mild traumatic brain injury. Transl Psychiatry2023;13(1):24; doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02313-9
43.
ChangCC, ChowCC, TellierLC, et al.Second-generation PLINK: Rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience2015;4:7; doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8
44.
GeT, ChenCY, NiY, et al.Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors. Nat Commun2019;10(1):1776; doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09718-5
45.
KinsellaGJ, OlverJ, OngB, et al.Mild traumatic brain injury in older adults: Early cognitive outcome. J Int Neuropsychol Soc2014;20(6):663–671; doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000447
46.
BroshekDK, KaushikT, FreemanJR, et al.Sex differences in outcome following sports-related concussion. J Neurosurg2005;102(5):856–863; doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.5.0856
47.
LevinHS, HantenG, RobersonG, et al.Prediction of cognitive sequelae based on abnormal computed tomography findings in children following mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Pediatr2008;1(6):461–470; doi: 10.3171/PED/2008/1/6/461
48.
SigurdardottirS, AndelicN, WehlingE, et al.Neuropsychological functioning in a national cohort of severe traumatic brain injury: Demographic and acute injury-related predictors. J Head Trauma Rehabil2015;30(2):E1–E12; doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000039
49.
BenjaminiY, HochbergY. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Methodol1995;57(1):289–300.
50.
TingleyD, YamamotoT, HiroseK, et al.Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. J Stat Soft2014;59(5):1–38.
51.
BiglerED, SternY. Traumatic brain injury and reserve. Handb Clin Neurol2015;128:691–710.
52.
SumowskiJF, ChiaravallotiN, KrchD, et al.Education attenuates the negative impact of traumatic brain injury on cognitive status. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2013;94(12):2562–2564; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.023
53.
SharpES, GatzM. Relationship between education and dementia: An updated systematic review. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord2011;25(4):289–304; doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318211c83c
54.
LevinHS, TemkinNR, BarberJ,et al.; TRACK-TBI Investigators. Association of sex and age with mild traumatic brain injury-related symptoms: A TRACK-TBI study. JAMA Netw Open2021;4(4):e213046; doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3046
55.
SilverbergND, GardnerAJ, BrubacherJR, et al.Systematic review of multivariable prognostic models for mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma2015;32(8):517–526; doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3600
56.
EzardG, SlackJ, PearceMJ, et al.Applying the British picture vocabulary scale to estimate premorbid cognitive ability in adults. Appl Neuropsychol Adult2022;29(5):1049–1059; doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1845700
57.
SnitzBE, BieliauskasLA, CrosslandAR, et al.PPVT-R as an estimate of premorbid intelligence in older adults. Clin Neuropsychol2000;14(2):181–186; doi: 10.1076/1385-4046(200005)14:2;1-Z;FT181
58.
BellNL, LassiterKS, MatthewsTD, et al.Comparison of the Peabody picture vocabulary test-third edition and Wechsler adult intelligence scale-third edition with university students. J Clin Psychol2001;57(3):417–422; doi: 10.1002/jclp.1024
59.
NordstromA, EdinBB, LindstromS, et al.Cognitive function and other risk factors for mild traumatic brain injury in young men: Nationwide cohort study. BMJ2013;346(mar11 1):f723–f723; doi: 10.1136/bmj.f723
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
