To identify, categorize, and rank the predictors of walking recovery in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). We prospectively registered (CRD42023443454) this review and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science until July 2025. We assessed study eligibility, extracted data, appraised study quality using the Quality In Prognostic Studies, and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. We meta-analyzed adjusted effect estimates within the same stratification when data from two or more studies were available; when meta-analysis was not appropriate, we presented the results qualitatively. Fifty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Study quality levels were rated as poor (3 [5.6%] of 54 studies), fair (40 [70%]), and good (11 [20.4%]) quality. Predictor variables were classified into five categories: (1) sociodemographic factors, (2) injury-related factors, (3) magnetic resonance imaging parameters, (4) serum/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, and (5) treatment-related factors. American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) and neurological level of injury (NLI) were found to be the most significant predictors of walking recovery (odds ratio [OR] = 3.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.86–4.79; p = 0.001; I2 = 2%; high certainty) and (OR = 2.81; 95% CI: 1.54–5.14; p = 0.008; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty), respectively. Patients with diabetes were less likely to regain ambulatory ability after SCI (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42–0.98; p = 0.038; I2 = 0.0%; moderate certainty). Other widely studied predictors, such as age and timing of surgery, showed inconsistent results across cutoffs. In conclusion, the initial severity of injury (AIS and NLI) was the strongest predictor of walking recovery, indicating that patients with less severe impairment at admission had a higher probability of walking recovery.
GBD Spinal Cord Injuries Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of spinal cord injury, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol, 2023; 22(11):1026–1047; doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00287-9
SimpsonLA, EngJJ, HsiehJT, et al.; Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Scire Research Team. The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J Neurotrauma, 2012; 29(8):1548–1555; doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2226
5.
ScivolettoG, TamburellaF, LaurenzaL, et al.Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury. Front Hum Neurosci, 2014; 8:141; doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00141
6.
RoystonP, MoonsKG, AltmanDG, et al.Prognosis and prognostic research: Developing a prognostic model. BMJ, 2009; 338:b604; doi: 10.1136/bmj.b604
7.
ScivolettoG, Di DonnaV. Prediction of walking recovery after spinal cord injury. Brain Res Bull, 2009; 78(1):43–51; doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.06.002
8.
MahanesD, MuehlschlegelS, WartenbergKE, et al.Guidelines for neuroprognostication in adults with traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurocrit Care, 2024; 40(2):415–437; doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01845-8
9.
Al-HabibAF, AttabibN, BallJ, et al.Clinical predictors of recovery after blunt spinal cord trauma: Systematic review. J Neurotrauma, 2011; 28(8):1431–1443; doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1157
10.
WilsonJR, CadotteDW, FehlingsMG. Clinical predictors of neurological outcome, functional status, and survival after traumatic spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine, 2012; 17(1 Suppl):11–26; doi: 10.3171/2012.4.AOSPINE1245
11.
AlHuthaifiF, KrzakJ, HankeT, et al.Predictors of functional outcomes in adults with traumatic spinal cord injury following inpatient rehabilitation: A systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med, 2017; 40(3):282–294; doi: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1238184
12.
KhorasanizadehM, YousefifardM, EskianM, et al.Neurological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine, 2019; 30(5):683–699; doi: 10.3171/2018.10.SPINE18802
13.
Mputu MputuP, BeauséjourM, Richard-DenisA, et al.Early predictors of neurological outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury: A systematic review and proposal of a conceptual framework. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2021; 100(7):700–711; doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001701
14.
Richard-DenisA, BeauséjourM, ThompsonC, et al.Early predictors of global functional outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J Neurotrauma, 2018; 35(15):1705–1725; doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5403
15.
PageMJ, McKenzieJE, BossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021; 372:n71; doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
16.
HaydenJA, van der WindtDA, CartwrightJL, et al.Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Ann Intern Med, 2013; 158(4):280–286; doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009
17.
IorioA, SpencerFA, FalavignaM, et al.Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: Rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients. Bmj, 2015; 350:h870; doi: 10.1136/bmj.h870
18.
BalshemH, HelfandM, SchünemannHJ, et al.GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011; 64(4):401–406; doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015
van HouwelingenHC, ArendsLR, StijnenT. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: Multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat Med, 2002; 21(4):589–624; doi: 10.1002/sim.1040
21.
CathomenA, MaierD, KrizJ, et al.; EMSCI study group. Walking outcome after traumatic paraplegic spinal cord injury: The function of which myotomes makes a difference? Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2023; 37(5):316–327; doi: 10.1177/15459683231166937
22.
CathomenA, SirucekL, KilleenT, et al.Inclusive trial designs in acute spinal cord injuries: Prediction-based stratification of clinical walking outcome and projected enrolment frequencies. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2022; 36(4–5):274–285; doi: 10.1177/15459683221078302
23.
AttabibN, O’ConnellC, KurbanD, et al.Factors associated with motor, sensory, bladder and bowel function recovery after traumatic cauda equina injury. J Neurotrauma, 2021; 38(3):322–329; doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7303
24.
Quinzaños-FresnedoJ, Fratini-EscobarPC, Almaguer-BenavidesKM, et al.Prognostic validity of a clinical trunk control test for independence and walking in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med, 2020; 43(3):331–338; doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1518124
25.
ShanmuganathanK, ZhuoJC, BodanapallyUK, et al.Comparison of acute diffusion tensor imaging and conventional magnetic resonance parameters in predicting long-term outcome after blunt cervical spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma, 2020; 37(3):458–465; doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6394
26.
PhanP, BudhramB, ZhangQ, et al.Highlighting discrepancies in walking prediction accuracy for patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: An evaluation of validated prediction models using a Canadian multicenter spinal cord injury registry. Spine J, 2019; 19(4):703–710; doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.016
27.
JajaBNR, JiangF, BadhiwalaJH, et al.Association of pneumonia, wound infection, and sepsis with clinical outcomes after acute traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma, 2019; 36(21):3044–3050; doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6245
28.
JiangF, JajaBNR, KurpadSN, et al.; North American Clinical Trials Network Collaborators. Acute adverse events after spinal cord injury and their relationship to long-term neurologic and functional outcomes: Analysis from the North American clinical trials network for spinal cord injury. Crit Care Med, 2019; 47(11):e854–e862; doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003937
29.
DalkilicT, FallahN, NoonanVK, et al.Predicting injury severity and neurological recovery after acute cervical spinal cord injury: A comparison of cerebrospinal fluid and magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers. J Neurotrauma, 2018; 35(3):435–445; doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5357
30.
HicksKE, ZhaoYC, FallahN, et al.; RHSCIR Network. A simplified clinical prediction rule for prognosticating independent walking after spinal cord injury: A prospective study from a Canadian multicenter spinal cord injury registry. Spine J, 2017; 17(10):1383–1392; doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.031
31.
MenonN, GuptaA, KhannaM, et al.Ambulation following spinal cord injury and its correlates. Ann Indian Acad Neurol, 2015; 18(2):167–170; doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.150605
32.
MallaR. External validation study of a clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury; 2013.
33.
van MiddendorpJJ, HosmanAJ, DondersAR, et al.; EM-SCI Study Group. A clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury: A longitudinal cohort study. Lancet, 2011; 377(9770):1004–1010; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62276-3
34.
ZornerB, BlanckenhornWU, DietzV, et al.Clinical algorithm for improved prediction of ambulation and patient stratification after incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma, 2010; 27(1):241–252; doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.0901
35.
KimCM, EngJJ, WhittakerMW. Level walking and ambulatory capacity in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury: Relationship with muscle strength. Spinal Cord, 2004; 42(3):156–162; doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101569
36.
FlandersAE, SpettellCM, FriedmanDP, et al.The relationship between the functional abilities of patients with cervical spinal cord injury and the severity of damage revealed by MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1999; 20(5):926–934.
37.
CurtA, DietzV. Ambulatory capacity in spinal cord injury: Significance of somatosensory evoked potentials and ASIA protocol in predicting outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1997; 78(1):39–43; doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90007-1
38.
JeanS, Mac-ThiongJM, JeanMC, et al.Early clinical prediction of independent outdoor functional walking capacity in a prospective cohort of traumatic spinal cord injury patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2021; 100(11):1034–1041; doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001812
39.
ColemanWP, GeislerFH. Injury severity as primary predictor of outcome in acute spinal cord injury: Retrospective results from a large multicenter clinical trial. Spine J, 2004; 4(4):373–378; doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.12.006
40.
OlesonCV, BurnsAS, DitunnoJF, et al.Prognostic value of pinprick preservation in motor complete, sensory incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2005; 86(5):988–992; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.031
41.
WirzM, van HedelHJ, RuppR, et al.Muscle force and gait performance: Relationships after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2006; 87(9):1218–1222; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.024
42.
KayED, DeutschA, WuermserLA. Predicting walking at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation after a traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2007; 88(6):745–750; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.013
43.
WinchesterP, SmithP, ForemanN, et al.A prediction model for determining over ground walking speed after locomotor training in persons with motor incomplete spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med, 2009; 32(1):63–71; doi: 10.1080/10790268.2009.11760754
44.
SacksGD, PanchmatiaJR, MarinoM, et al.The effect of operative timing on functional outcome after isolated spinal trauma. J Trauma, 2011; 71(6):1668–1672; doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823246a5
45.
TeeterL, GassawayJ, TaylorS, et al.Relationship of physical therapy inpatient rehabilitation interventions and patient characteristics to outcomes following spinal cord injury: The SCIRehab project. J Spinal Cord Med, 2012; 35(6):503–526; doi: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000058
46.
MatsushitaA, MaedaT, MoriE, et al.Subacute T1-low intensity area reflects neurological prognosis for patients with cervical spinal cord injury without major bone injury. Spinal Cord, 2016; 54(1):24–28; doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.84
47.
LeeBA, LeibyBE, MarinoRJ. Neurological and functional recovery after thoracic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med, 2016; 39(1):67–76; doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000280
48.
van SilfhoutL, PetersAE, GracoM, et al.Validation of the Dutch clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcomes in an inpatient setting following traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 2016; 54(8):614–618; doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.201
49.
MatsushitaA, MaedaT, MoriE, et al.Can the acute MRI features reflect neurological prognosis in patients with cervical spinal cord injury? Spine J, 2017; 17(9):1319–1324; doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.009
50.
BelliveauT, JetteAM, SeetharamaS, et al.Developing artificial neural network models to predict functioning one year after traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2016; 97(10):1663–1668.e3; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.014
51.
OlesonCV, MarinoRJ, LeibyBE, et al.Influence of age alone, and age combined with pinprick, on recovery of walking function in motor complete, sensory incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2016; 97(10):1635–1641; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.024
52.
AbdelFatahMA. The walking recovery one year after surgical management of thoracolumbar burst fracture in paraplegic patients. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2017; 57(9):467–471; doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2017-0017
53.
NakajimaH, TakahashiA, KitadeI, et al.Prognostic factors and optimal management for patients with cervical spinal cord injury without major bone injury. J Orthop Sci, 2019; 24(2):230–236; doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.10.001
54.
WutteC, BeckerJ, KleinB, et al.Early decompression (<8 hours) improves functional bladder outcome and mobility after traumatic thoracic spinal cord injury. World Neurosurg, 2020; 134:e847–e854; doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.015
55.
DeVriesZ, HodaM, RiversCS, et al.; RHSCIR Network. Development of an unsupervised machine learning algorithm for the prognostication of walking ability in spinal cord injury patients. Spine J, 2020; 20(2):213–224; doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.007
56.
Engel-HaberE, ZeiligG, HaberS, et al.The effect of age and injury severity on clinical prediction rules for ambulation among individuals with spinal cord injury. Spine J, 2020; 20(10):1666–1675; doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.551
57.
LeisterI, LindeLD, VoAK, et al.Routine blood chemistry predicts functional recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury: A post hoc analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2021; 35(4):321–333; doi: 10.1177/1545968321992328
58.
SmithAC, AlbinSR, O’DellDR, et al.Axial MRI biomarkers of spinal cord damage to predict future walking and motor function: A retrospective study. Spinal Cord, 2021; 59(6):693–699; doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-00561-w
59.
Engel-HaberE, RadomislenskyI, PelegK, et al.; Israel Trauma Group. Early trauma predictors of mobility in people with spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2021; 46(20):E1089–E1096; doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004053
60.
NakaT, HayashiT, SugyoA, et al.The effects of lower extremity deep sensory impairments on walking capability in patients with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med, 2022; 45(2):287–292; doi: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1788879
61.
SasagawaT, YokogawaN, HayashiH, et al.A multicenter study of 1-year mortality and walking capacity after spinal fusion surgery for cervical fracture in elderly patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2022; 23(1):798; doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05752-5
62.
NakaT, HayashiT, SugyoA, et al.Effect of age at injury on walking ability following incomplete cervical spinal cord injury: A retrospective cohort study. Spine Surg Relat Res, 2022; 6(6):604–609; doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2021-0240
63.
Garcia-RudolphA, WrightMA, BenitoJ, et al.Clinical prediction rule validation for ambulation outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury in a Spanish population. J Trauma Nurs, 2022; 29(4):201–209; doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000662
64.
MoonTJ, FurdockR, AhnN. Do patients with chronic diabetes have worse motor outcomes after cervical ASIA C traumatic spinal cord injury? Clin Spine Surg, 2022; 35(9):E731–E736; doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001362
65.
NakajimaH, YokogawaN, SasagawaT, et al.; JASA Study Group. Prognostic factors for cervical spinal cord injury without major bone injury in elderly patients. J Neurotrauma, 2022; 39(9–10):658–666; doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0351
66.
HongHA, WaldenK, LaskinJJ, et al.; Canadian SCI Standing and Walking Measures Group. Using the standing and walking assessment tool at discharge predicts community outdoor walking capacity in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury. Phys Ther, 2023; 103(11):pzad106; doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad106
67.
HirotaR, TerashimaY, OhnishiH, et al.Prognostic impact of respiratory dysfunction in elderly patients with cervical spinal cord injury and/or fractures: A multicenter survey. Eur Spine J, 2023; 32(10):3522–3532; doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07828-9
68.
SmithAC, DraganichC, ThorntonWA, et al.A single dermatome clinical prediction rule for independent walking one year after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2023; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.04.002
69.
DraganichC, WeberKA, ThorntonWA, et al.Predicting outdoor walking 1 year after spinal cord injury: A retrospective, multisite external validation study. J Neurol Phys Ther, 2023; 47(3):155–161; doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000428
70.
SenthilvelkumarT, ChalageriPH, DurairajSK, et al.Orthotic walking outcome of persons with motor complete low thoracic spinal cord injury—A retrospective study. Spinal Cord, 2023; 61(3):224–230; doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00875-5
71.
BerlinerJC, O’DellDR, AlbinSR, et al.The influence of conventional T2 MRI indices in predicting who will walk outside one year after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med, 2023; 46(3):501–507; doi: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1907676
72.
YooHJ, LeeKS, KooB, et al.Deep learning-based prediction model for gait recovery after a spinal cord injury. Diagnostics (Basel), 2024; 14(6):579; doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14060579
73.
MakiS, FuruyaT, InoueT, et al.Machine learning web application for predicting functional outcomes in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury following inpatient rehabilitation. J Neurotrauma, 2024; 41(9–10):1089–1100; doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0383
74.
ThorntonWA, MarzloffG, RyderS, et al.The presence or absence of midsagittal tissue bridges and walking: A retrospective cohort study in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 2023; 61(8):436–440; doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00890-6
75.
BrouwersEMJR, MeentH, CurtA, et al.; EMSCI participants and investigators. Recovery after traumatic thoracic- and lumbar spinal cord injury: The neurological level of injury matters. Spinal Cord, 2020; 58(9):980–987; doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0463-1
76.
SmithAC, WeberKA, ParrishTB, et al.Ambulatory function in motor incomplete spinal cord injury: A magnetic resonance imaging study of spinal cord edema and lower extremity muscle morphometry. Spinal Cord, 2017; 55(7):672–678; doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.18
77.
O’DellDR, WeberKA, BerlinerJC, et al.Midsagittal tissue bridges are associated with walking ability in incomplete spinal cord injury: A magnetic resonance imaging case series. J Spinal Cord Med, 2020; 43(2):268–271; doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1527079
78.
PfyfferD, VallottonK, CurtA, et al.Predictive value of midsagittal tissue bridges on functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2021; 35(1):33–43; doi: 10.1177/1545968320971787
79.
FehlingsMG, TetreaultLA, HachemL, et al.An update of a clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with acute spinal cord injury: Recommendations on the role and timing of decompressive surgery. Global Spine J, 2024; 14(3_suppl):174S–186S; doi: 10.1177/21925682231181883
80.
ChikudaH, KoyamaY, MatsubayashiY, et al.Effect of early vs delayed surgical treatment on motor recovery in incomplete cervical spinal cord injury with preexisting cervical stenosis: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open, 2021; 4(11):e2133604; doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33604
81.
BadhiwalaJH, WilsonJR, WitiwCD, et al.The influence of timing of surgical decompression for acute spinal cord injury: A pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurol, 2021; 20(2):117–126; doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30406-3
82.
AkkurtH, KarapolatHU, KirazliY, et al.The effects of upper extremity aerobic exercise in patients with spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2017; 53(2):219–227; doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.03804-1
83.
TruchonC, FallahN, SantosA, et al.Impact of therapy on recovery during rehabilitation in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma, 2017; 34(20):2901–2909; doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4932
84.
KirshblumS, SniderB, ErenF, et al.Characterizing natural recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma, 2021; 38(9):1267–1284; doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7473
