The Ontario Renal Network (ORN), a provincial government agency in Ontario, Canada, launched an initiative in 2012 to increase home dialysis use province-wide. The initiative included a new modality-based funding formula, a standard mandatory informatics system, targets for prevalent home dialysis rates, the development of a ‘network’ of renal programmes with commitment to home dialysis and a culture of accountability with frequent meetings between ORN and each renal programme leadership to review their results. It also included funding of home dialysis coordinators, encouragement and funding of assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD), and support for catheter insertion and urgent start PD. Between 2012 and 2017, home dialysis use rose from 21.9% to 26.5% and then between 2017 and 2019 stabilised at 26% to 26.5%. Over 7 years, the absolute number of people on home dialysis increased 40% from 2222 to 3105, while the number on facility haemodialysis grew 11% from 7935 to 8767. PD prevalence rose from 16.6% to 20.9%, a relative increase of 25%. The initiative showed that a sustained multifaceted approach can increase home dialysis utilisation.
KlarenbachSWTonelliMChuiB, et al.Economic evaluation of dialysis therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol2014; 10: 644–652.
2.
YeatesKZhuNVoneshE, et al.Peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis are associated with similar outcomes for end-stage renal disease in Canada. Nephrol Dial Transplant2012; 27: 3568–3575.
3.
KrahnMDBremnerKEde OliveiraC, et al.Home dialysis is associated with lower costs and better survival than other modalities; a population based study in Ontario, Canada. Perit Dial Int2019; 39: 553–561.
4.
LukowskiLRMehrotraRKheifetsL, et al.Comparing mortality of peritoneal and hemodialysis patients in the first 2 years of dialysis therapy; a marginal structural model analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2013; 8: 619–628.
5.
HeafJGWehbergS. Relative survival of peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis patients: effect of cohort and mode of dialysis initiation. PLoS One2014; 9: e90119.
6.
MarshallMRWalkerRCPolkinghorneKP, et al.Survival on home dialysis risk in New Zealand. PLoS One2014; 9(5): e96847.
7.
McFarlanePAPierratosARedelmeierD. Cost savings of home nocturnal versus conventional in-center hemodialysis. Kidney Int2002; 62: 2216–2222.
8.
WalkerRMarshallMRMortonRL, et al.The cost-effectiveness of contemporary home haemodialysis modalities compared with facility haemodialysis: a systematic review of full economic evaluations. Nephrology (Carlton)2014; 19: 459–470.
9.
LiPKChowKM. Peritoneal dialysis-first made successful: perspectives and actions. Am J Kidney Dis2013; 62: 993–1005.
10.
TantivessSWerayingyongPChuengsamanP, et al.Universal coverage of renal dialysis in Thailand: promise, progress and prospects. BMJ2013: 36; 1462.
AshtonTMarshallMR. The organization and financing of dialysis and kidney transplantation services in New Zealand. Int J Health Care Finance Econ2007; 7: 233–252.
GolperTA.The possible impact of the U.S. prospective payment system (‘bundle’) on the growth of peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int2013; 33: 596–599.
15.
LinEChengXZChinKK, et al.Home dialysis in the prospective payment system. Era J Am Soc Nephrol2017; 28: 2993–3004.
16.
AmairPKhannaRLeibelB, et al.Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in diabetics with end-stage renal disease. N Engl J Med1982; 306: 625–630.
17.
UldallROuwendykMFrancoeurR, et al.Slow nocturnal home hemodialysis at the Wellesley Hospital. Adv Renal Replace Ther1996: 3: 133–136.
18.
OreopoulosDGColemanSDoyleE. Reversing the decreasing peritoneal dialysis (PD) trend in Ontario: a government initiative to increase PD use in Ontario to 30% by 2010. Perit Dial Int2007; 27: 489–495.
19.
OliverMQuinnRRRichardsonAR, et al.Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int2007; 71: 673–678.
WoodwardGLIversonAHarveyR, et al.Implementation of an agency to improve chronic kidney disease care in Ontario: lessons learned by the Ontario Renal Network. Healthc Q2015; 17: Spec No44–47.
NissensonARPrichardSSChengIK, et al.ESRD methodology into the 21st century: the importance of non-medical factors. ASAIO J1997; 43: 143–150.
30.
JustPMde CharroFTTschosikEA, et al.Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world. Nephrol Dial Transplant2008; 23: 2365–2373.
31.
BlakeP. Proliferation of hemodialysis units and declining peritoneal dialysis use: an international trend. Am J Kidney Dis2009; 54: 194–196.
32.
GoovaertsTJadoulMGoffinE. Influence of a pre-dialysis education programme (PDEP) on the mode of renal replacement therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant2005; 20: 1842–1847.
33.
SmartNADiebergGLadhaniM, et al.Early referral to specialist nephrology services for preventing the progression to end-stage kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2012; 6: CD007333.
34.
KolesnykIDekkerFWBoeschoetenEW, et al.Time dependent reasons for peritoneal dialysis technique failure and mortality. Perit Dial Int2010; 30: 170–177.
35.
SchaubelDBlakePGFentonSS. Effect of renal center characteristics on mortality and technique failure on peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int2001; 60: 1517–1524.
36.
HtayHChoYPascoeEM, et al.Multicenter registry analysis of center characteristics associated with technique failure in patients on incident peritoneal dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2017; 12: 1090–1099.
37.
AlkatheeriAMBlakePGGrayD, et al.Success of urgent start peritoneal dialysis in a large Canadian renal program. Perit Dial Int2016; 36: 171–176.
38.
MannsBAgarJWNBiyaniM, et al.Can economic incentives increase the use of home dialysis?Nephrol Dial Transplant2019; 34: 731–741.
39.
BerensonRARiceT. Beyond measurements and reward: methods of motivating quality improvement and accountability. Health Serv Res2015; 50(suppl 2): 2155–2186.
40.
TangriNStevensLAGriffithJ, et al.A predictive model for progression of chronic kidney disease to kidney failure. JAMA2011; 305: 153–159.
41.
PierratosATremblayMKandasamyG, et al.Personal Support Worker (PSW) – supported home hemodialysis: a paradigm shift. Hemo Dial Int2016. DOI: 10.1111/hdi.
42.
BlakePGQuinnRROliverM. Peritoneal dialysis and the process of modality selection. Perit Dial Int2013; 33: 233–241.
43.
MendelssohnDC.Increasing PD utilization: Should suitable patients be forced?Perit Dial Int2009; 29: 144–146.
