The intersection of the COVID-19 pandemic and anti-Black violence prompted talk of racial reckoning among educational grantmakers in 2020 to 2021. This study examines the nature and extent of this reckoning, offering insights into policy actors’ responses to racialized crises. Through an analysis of grantmakers’ professed policy repertoires—consisting of administrative practices, sites of intervention, and sources of expertise—we delineate the mechanisms shaping grantmaker responses to sociopolitical crises. While some grantmakers temporarily shifted administrative practices in response to COVID-19, deeper changes remained elusive. The study highlights how institutionalized white-centered norms and practices persist within educational policymaking, constraining material progress toward racial equity. Moreover, it underscores the pivotal role of proximity to racial injustice in motivating substantive changes to policy repertoires. We conclude with an appeal to grantmakers and other policy actors to shift from performative reckoning to tangible reparative actions that can weaken racialized structures.
AksartovaS. (2003). In search of legitimacy: Peace grant making of US philanthropic foundations, 1988–1996. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(1), 25–46.
2.
AlbertS.WhettenD. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295.
3.
AndrewsK. T. (2001). Social movements and policy implementation: The Mississippi civil rights movement and the war on poverty, 1965 to 1971. American Sociological Review, 66(1), 71–95.
4.
ArnoveR. F. (Ed.). (1980). Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism: The Foundations at Home and Abroad (Midland Book ed. edition). Indiana University Press.
5.
AromaaE.ErikssonP.MillsJ. H.HiltunenE.LammassaariM.MillsA. J. (2018). Critical sensemaking: challenges and promises. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 14(3), 356–376.
6.
AuW. (2016). Meritocracy 2.0: High-stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30(1), 39–62.
7.
BaltodanoM. P. (2017). The power brokers of neoliberalism: Philanthrocapitalists and public education. Policy Futures in Education, 15(2), 141–156.
8.
BarleyS. R.TolbertP. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization studies, 18(1), 93–117.
9.
BartleyT. (2007). How foundations shape social movements: The construction of an organizational field and the rise of forest certification. Social Problems, 54(3), 229–255.
10.
BensonK. J. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 1–21.
11.
BushouseB. K.MosleyJ. E. (2018). The intermediary roles of foundations in the policy process: Building coalitions of interest. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 7(3), 289–311.
12.
ButeauE.BuchananP.GopalR. (2013). How far have we come? Foundation CEOs on progress and impact. The Center for Effective Philanthropy.
13.
CarboniJ. L.EikenberryA. M. (2021). Do giving circles democratize philanthropy? Donor identity and giving to historically marginalized groups. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(2), 247–256.
14.
ChenC. Y.KahanamokuS. S.TripatiA.AlegadoR. A.MorrisV. R.AndradeK.HosbeyJ. (2022). Decades of systemic racial disparities in funding rates at the National Science Foundation. OSF Preprints.
15.
ChristiansonM. K.BartonM. A. (2021). Sensemaking in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 572–576.
16.
ClemensE. S.CookJ. M. (1999). Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 441–466.
17.
DiMaggioP.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
18.
DorseyC.BradachJ.KimP. (2020, June5). The problem with “color-blind” philanthropy. Harvard Business Review.
19.
DunningC. (2023). No strings attached: Philanthropy, race, and donor control from black power to black lives matter. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1), 29–49.
20.
EikenberryA. M.MirabellaR. M. (2018). Extreme philanthropy: Philanthrocapitalism, effective altruism, and the discourse of neoliberalism. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(1), 43–47.
21.
EmirbayerM.DesmondM. (2015). The racial order. University of Chicago Press.
22.
EmirbayerM.JohnsonV. (2008). Bourdieu and organizational analysis. Theory and Society, 37(1), 1–44.
23.
EmirbayerM.MischeA. (1998). What is agency?American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.
24.
FerrisJ. M.HentschkeG. C.HarmssenH. J. (2008). Philanthropic strategies for school reform: An analysis of foundation choices. Educational Policy, 22(5), 705–730.
25.
FligsteinN. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125.
26.
FrancisM. M. (2019). The price of civil rights: Black lives, White funding, and movement capture. Law & Society Review, 53(1), 275–309.
27.
GallagherK. S.BaileyJ. D. (2000). The politics of teacher education reform: Strategic philanthropy and public policy making. Educational Policy, 14(1), 11–24.
28.
GándaraD.AcevedoR.CervantesD.QuirozM. A. (2023). Advancing a framework of racialized administrative burdens in higher education policy (EdWorkingPaper No. 23-697). Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University.
29.
GándaraD.RippnerJ. A.NessE. C. (2017). Exploring the “how” in policy diffusion: National intermediary organizations’ roles in facilitating the spread of performance-based funding policies in states. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 701–725.
30.
GiridharadasA. (2018). Winners take all: The elite charade of changing the world (1st ed., First Printing edition). Knopf.
31.
GreenwoodR.HiningsC. R. (1993). Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 1052–1081.
32.
GreenwoodR.HiningsC. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054.
33.
HaddadN.ReckhowS. (2018). The shifting role of higher education philanthropy: A network analysis of philanthropic policy strategies. Philanthropy & Education, 2(1), 25.
34.
Helms MillsJ.ThurlowA.MillsA. J. (2010). Making sense of sensemaking: the critical sensemaking approach. Qualitative research in organizations and management:An international journal, 5(2), 182–195.
35.
KingdonJ. W. (2013). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (Pearson New International Edition). Pearson Education Limited.
36.
JemalA. (2017). Critical consciousness: A critique and critical analysis of the literature. The Urban Review, 49(4), 602–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-017-0411-3
37.
JenkinsJ. C.EckertC. M. (1986). Channeling black insurgency: Elite patronage and professional social movement organizations in the development of the black movement. American Sociological Review, 812–829.
38.
JungS.EikenberryA.Webb FarleyK.BrainardL. (2023). How do foundations support (anti-)racism? A critical race theory perspective on philanthropy and racial equity. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 28(4), e1744.
39.
KhanS. R. (2012). The sociology of elites. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 361–377.
40.
LubienskiC.BrewerT. J.La LondeP. G. (2016). Orchestrating policy ideas: Philanthropies and think tanks in US education policy advocacy networks. The Australian Educational Researcher, 43(1), 55–73.
41.
LyonM. A.BretasS. S.ReadyD. D. (2023). Design philanthropy: Challenges and opportunities in the evolution of philanthropic giving. Educational Policy, 37(3), 731–768.
42.
MaitlisS. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49.
43.
MaitlisS.SonensheinS. (2010). Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 551–580.
44.
MaxeyD.KezarA. (2015). Revealing opportunities and obstacles for changing non-tenure-track faculty practices: An examination of stakeholders’ awareness of institutional contradictions. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(4), 564–594.
45.
McCamblyH.AndersonE. R. (2020). Moving the needle or spinning our wheels? A framework for long-lasting, equitable change in education. The Foundation Review, 12(3), 7.
46.
McCamblyH.ColyvasJ. A. (2022). Institutionalizing inequality anew: Grantmaking and racialized postsecondary organizations. Review of Higher Education, 46(1), 67–107.
47.
McCamblyH.ColyvasJ. A. (2023). Dismantling or disguising racialization?: Defining racialized change work in the context of postsecondary grantmaking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(2), 203–216.
48.
McCamblyH.MulroyQ. (2024). Constructing an educational “quality” crisis: (E)quality politics and racialization beyond target beneficiaries. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 46(2), 192–221.
49.
McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241.
50.
MeyersonD.TompkinsM. (2007). Tempered radicals as institutional change agents: The case of advancing gender equity at the University of Michigan. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 30(2), 303–322.
51.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
52.
MilesM. B.HubermanM. A.SaldañaJ. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
53.
MosleyJ. E.GalaskiewiczJ. (2015). The relationship between philanthropic foundation funding and state-level policy in the era of welfare reform. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1225–1254.
54.
O’ConnorA. (2010). Bringing the market back in: Philanthropic activism and conservative reform. In ClemensE. S.GuthrieD. (Eds.), Politics and partnerships: The role of voluntary associations in America’s political past and present (pp. 121–150). The University of Chicago Press.
55.
PhilipT. M.BangM.JacksonK. (2018). Articulating the “how,” the “for what,” the “for whom,” and the “with whom” in concert: A call to broaden the benchmarks of our scholarship. Taylor & Francis.
56.
PosseltJ.HernandezT.VillarrealC. D. (2019). Choose wisely: Making decisions with and for equity in higher education. In KezarA.PosseltJ. (Eds.), Higher education administration for social justice and equity (pp. 43–66). Routledge.
57.
RalphM.SinghalM. (2019). Racial capitalism. Theory and Society, 48(6), 851–881.
58.
RavasiD.RindovaV.DalpiazE. (2017). Analyzing changes in organizational cultural repertoires. In MirR.JainS. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to qualitative research in organization studies (pp. 203–225). Routledge.
59.
RavitchD. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. Vintage.
60.
RayV. (2019). A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 26–53.
61.
RayV.HerdP.MoynihanD. (2023). Racialized burdens: Applying racialized organization theory to the administrative state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 139–152.
62.
ReckhowS.Tompkins-StangeM. (2018). Financing the education policy discourse: Philanthropic funders as entrepreneurs in policy networks. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 7(3), 258–288.
63.
ReichR. (2006). Philanthropy and its uneasy relation to equality. Taking Philanthropy Seriously: Beyond Noble Intentions to Responsible Giving, 28.
64.
ReichR.CordelliC.BernholzL. (2016). Philanthropy in democratic societies: History, institutions, values. University of Chicago Press.
65.
RindovaV.DalpiazE.RavasiD. (2011). A cultural quest: A study of organizational use of new cultural resources in strategy formation. Organization Science, 22(2), 413–431.
66.
RiveraP.ChunM. (2023). Unpacking the Power Dynamics of Funding Research-Practice Partnerships. Educational Policy, 37(1), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048221134585
67.
RobinsonG. (2000). Stepping into our destiny: Service learning in community colleges. Community College Journal, 70(3), 8–12.
68.
RodgersA. J.LieraR. (2023). When Race Becomes Capital: Diversity, Faculty Hiring, and the Entrenchment of Racial Capitalism in Higher Education. Educational Researcher, 52(7), 444–449. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231175359
69.
RojasF.KingB. G. (2018). How social movements interact with organizations and fields: Protest, institutions, and beyond. In SouleD. A.KriesiS. A.McCammonH. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 203–219). John Wiley & Sons.
70.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
71.
SaltmanK. (2010). The gift of education: Public education and venture philanthropy. Springer.
72.
SandsS. R. (2022). Institutional change and the rise of an ecosystem model in education philanthropy. Educational Policy.
73.
SchildtH.MantereS.CornelissenJ. (2020). Power in sensemaking processes. Organization Studies, 41(2), 241–265.
74.
SchneibergM.LounsburyM. (2017). Social movements and the dynamics of institutions and organizations. The Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 648, 670.
75.
ScottJ. (2009). The politics of venture philanthropy in charter school policy and advocacy. Educational Policy, 23(1), 106–136.
76.
ScottW. R. (2015). Organizational theory and higher education. Journal of Organizational Theory in Education, 1(1), 68–76.
77.
SelznickP. (1957). Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation.
78.
SeoM. G.CreedW. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.
79.
SilverI. (1998). Buying an activist identity: Reproducing class through social movement philanthropy. Sociological Perspectives, 41(2), 303–321.
80.
SilverI. (2007). Disentangling class from philanthropy: The double-edged sword of alternative giving. Critical Sociology, 33(3), 537–549.
81.
SmallM. L. (2009). ‘How many cases do I need?’ On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38.
82.
SpadeD. (2020). Mutual aid: Building solidarity during this crisis (and the next). Verso Books.
83.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
84.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
85.
SuárezD. F. (2012). Grant making as advocacy: The emergence of social justice philanthropy. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(3), 259–280.
86.
SwidlerA. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American sociological review, 273–286.
87.
Tompkins-StangeM. E. (2016). Policy patrons: Philanthropy, education reform, and the politics of influence. Harvard Education Press.
88.
VillanuevaE. (2018). Decolonizing wealth: Indigenous wisdom to heal divides and restore balance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
89.
WeberK. (2005). A toolkit for analyzing corporate cultural toolkits. Poetics, 33(3-4), 227–252.
90.
WeickK. E. (2020). Sensemaking, organizing, and surpassing: A handoff. Journal of Management Studies, 57(7), 1420–1431.
91.
WeissR. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. Free Press.
92.
White-LewisD. K. (2021). Before the ad: How departments generate hiring priorities that support or avert faculty diversity. Teachers College Record, 123(1), 1–36.
93.
WootenM. E. (2010). Soliciting elites: The framing activities of the United Negro College Fund. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 15(3), 369–391.
94.
WootenM. E.CoulouteL. (2017). The production of racial inequality within and among organizations. Sociology Compass, 11(1), e12446.
95.
YinR. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage.
96.
ZuckerL. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 443–464.
