This critical ethnography utilizes critical policy analysis and a theoretical understanding of neoliberal racism to examine the practiced reality of school choice in a public, under-resourced, and historically underperforming neighborhood elementary school attended predominantly by Latina/o/x students. Despite improvement initiatives that resulted in performance distinctions, the school under study experienced substantial enrollment decline amidst the poaching of students by charter schools within the attendance zone. Moreover, the competitive school choice market within the school’s district resulted in the reshuffling of teachers, reinforcement of neoliberal improvement discourses, and even the exploitation of dual language students to raise the school’s market profile. The study provides a unique, up-close representation of marketization in public schools and the residualizing effects that school choice policies can have on public education writ large.
AggarwalU. (2016). The ideological architecture of whiteness as property in educational policy. Educational Policy, 30(1), 128–152.
2.
AllweissA.GrantC. A.ManningK. (2015). Behind the photos and the tears: Media images, neoliberal discourses, racialized constructions of space and school closings in Chicago. Race Ethnicity and Education, 18(5), 611–631.
3.
André-BechelyL. (2005). Public school choice at the intersection of voluntary integration and not-so-good neighborhood schools: Lessons from parents’ experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(2), 267–305.
4.
AppleM. W. (2019). On doing critical policy analysis. Educational Policy, 33(1), 276–287.
5.
ArumR. (2000). Schools and communities: Ecological and institutional dimensions. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 395–418.
6.
AtwoodE.LópezG. R. (2014). Let’s be critically honest: Towards a messier counterstory in critical race theory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1134–1154.
7.
DuarteB. J. (2021). “Part of their chemistry”: The reproduction of neoliberal governmentality in principal and teacher subjectivities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 52(3), 274–293.
8.
DuarteB. J.BrewerC. A. (2019). “Caught in the nets of ‘discipline’”: Understanding the possibilities for writing teachers’ resistance to standardization in local policy. Educational Policy, 33(1), 88–110.
9.
DuarteB. J.BrewerC. A. (2022). “We’re in compliance”: Reconciling teachers’ work as resistance to neoliberal policies. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30, 105–105.
10.
AuW. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267.
11.
AuW. (2016). Meritocracy 2.0: High-stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30(1), 39–62.
12.
BaldridgeB. J. (2017). “It’s like this myth of the supernegro”: Resisting narratives of damage and struggle in the neoliberal educational policy context. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(6), 781–795.
13.
BallS. J. (1995). Intellectuals or technicians? The urgent role of theory in educational studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43(3), 255–271.
14.
BallS. J. (2015). Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 299–301.
15.
BallS. J.MaguireM.BraunA. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge.
16.
BallS. J.MaguireM.MacraeS. (1998). ‘Race’, space and the further education market place. Race Ethnicity and Education, 1(2), 171–189.
17.
BallS. J.OlmedoA. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 85–96.
18.
Bambrick-SantoyoP. (2016). Get better faster: A 90-day plan for coaching new teachers. John Wiley & Sons.
19.
BarlowA. L. (2003). Between fear and Hope: Globalization and race in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield.
20.
BellD. A. (1992). Racial realism. Connecticut Law Review, 24, 363–379.
21.
BifulcoR.LaddH. F. (2006). The impacts of charter schools on student achievement: Evidence from North Carolina. Education Finance and Policy, 1(1), 50–90.
22.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield.
23.
BrownA. L.De LissovoyN. (2011). Economies of racism: Grounding education policy research in the complex dialectic of race, class, and capital. Journal of Education Policy, 26(5), 595–619.
24.
BurasK. (2011). Race, charter schools, and conscious capitalism: On the spatial politics of whiteness as property (and the unconscionable assault on Black New Orleans). Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 296–331.
25.
CarpenterB. W.BrewerC. (2014). The implicated advocate: The discursive construction of the democratic practices of school principals in the USA. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(2), 294–306.
26.
CarspeckenP. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research. Routledge.
27.
ChenG. A.BuellJ. Y. (2018). Of models and myths: Asian (Americans) in STEM and the neoliberal racial project. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(5), 607–625.
28.
CucchiaraM. (2008). Re-branding urban schools: Urban revitalization, social status, and marketing public schools to the upper middle class. Journal of Education Policy, 23(2), 165–179.
29.
DavisD. A. (2007). Narrating the mute: Racializing and racism in a neoliberal moment. Souls, 9(4), 346–360.
30.
DavisT. M. (2013). Charter school competition, organization, and achievement in traditional public schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(88), 88.
31.
DeedsV.PattilloM. (2015). Organizational “failure” and institutional pluralism: A case study of an urban school closure. Urban Education, 50(4), 474–504.
32.
DelgadoR.StefanicJ. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York University Press.
33.
DiemS.CarpenterB. W.Lewis-DurhamT. (2019). Preparing antiracist school leaders in a school choice context. Urban Education, 54(5), 706–731.
34.
DiemS.YoungM. D. (2015). Considering critical turns in research on educational leadership and policy. The International Journal of Educational Management, 29(7), 838–850.
35.
DiMartinoC.JessenS. B. (2016). School brand management: The policies, practices, and perceptions of branding and marketing in New York City’s public high schools. Urban Education, 51(5), 447–475.
36.
DirlikA. (2008). Race talk, race, and contemporary racism. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 123(5), 1363–1379.
37.
Dudley-MarlingC.BakerD. (2012). The effects of market-based school reforms on students with disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v32i2.3187
38.
DugganL. (2003). The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on Democracy. Beacon Press.
39.
DumasM. J. (2016). My brother as “Problem” neoliberal governmentality and interventions for black young men and boys. Educational Policy, 30(1), 94–113.
40.
DumasM. J.DixsonA. D.MayorgaE. (2016). Educational policy and the cultural politics of race: Introduction to the special issue. Educational Policy, 30(1), 3–12.
41.
FitzgeraldS.StaceyM.McGrath-ChampS.PardingK.RainnieA. (2018). Devolution, market dynamics and the Independent Public School initiative in Western Australia: ‘winning back’ what has been lost?Journal of Education Policy, 33(5), 662–681.
42.
FloresN. (2016). A tale of two visions: Hegemonic whiteness and bilingual education. Educational Policy, 30(1), 13–38.
43.
FloresN.McAuliffeL. (2022). ‘in other schools you can plan it that way’: A raciolinguistic perspective on dual language education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25, 1349–1362.
44.
FrankenbergE.KotokS.SchafftK.MannB. (2017). Exploring school choice and the consequences for student racial segregation within Pennsylvania’s charter school transfers. Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 25, 22–34.
45.
FreidusA. (2020). Modes of belonging: Debating School Demographics in gentrifying New York. American Educational Research Journal, 57(2), 808–839.
46.
FreieC.EppleyK. (2014). Putting Foucault to work: Understanding power in a rural school. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(5), 652–669.
47.
FullerE. (2014). Cream skimming in Texas: A comparison of the characteristics of students entering high-profile charter schools in the same zip code.
48.
GarciaD. R. (2008). The impact of school choice on racial segregation in charter schools. Educational Policy, 22(6), 805–829.
49.
GardaR. A.Jr. (2011). Culture clash: Special education in charter schools. NCL Rev, 90, 655.
50.
GillbornD. (2005). Education policy as an act of white supremacy: Whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 485–505.
51.
GillC.NesbittL. L. C.ParkerL. (2017). Silent covenants in the neoliberal era: Critical race counternarratives on African American advocacy leadership in schools. In YoungM. D.DiemS. (Eds.), Critical Approaches to education policy analysis (pp. 155–174). Springer.
52.
GirouxH. A. (2003). Spectacles of race and pedagogies of denial: Anti-black racist pedagogy under the reign of neoliberalism. Communication Education, 52(3-4), 191–211.
53.
GoldbergD. T. (2009). The threat of Race: Reflections on racial neoliberalism. Wiley-Blackwell.
54.
GulsonK. N.WebbP. T. (2016). Not just another alternative school: Policy problematization, neoliberalism, and racial biopolitics. Educational Policy, 30(1), 153–170.
55.
HackworthJ. (2007). The neoliberal city: Governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Cornell University Press.
56.
HarveyD. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
57.
HeiligJ. V.ClarkB.Jr. (2018). New insights and directions: Considering the impact of charter school attributes on communities of color. Journal of Transformative Leadership and Policy Studies, 7(1), 3–9.
58.
HenryK. L. (2019). Heretical discourses in post-Katrina Charter School Applications. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2609–2643.
59.
HenryK. L.DixsonA. D. (2016). “Locking the door before we got the keys” racial realities of the charter school authorization process in post-Katrina New Orleans. Educational Policy, 30(1), 218–240.
60.
HessF.MarantoR.MillimanS. (2001). Small districts in big trouble: How four Arizona school systems responded to charter competition. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1102–1124.
61.
HigginsC.Knight AbowitzK. (2011). What makes a public school public? A framework for evaluating the civic substance of schooling. Educational Theory, 61(4), 365–380.
62.
HillocksG.Jr. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning. Teachers College Press.
63.
HolmeJ. J.CarkhumR.RangelV. S. (2013). High pressure reform: Examining urban schools’ response to multiple school choice policies. The Urban Review, 45(2), 167–196.
64.
HorsfordS. D. (2017). A race to the top from the bottom of the well? The paradox of race and US education reform. The Educational Forum, 81(2), 136–147.
65.
HorsfordS. D. (2019). School integration in the new Jim Crow: Opportunity or oxymoron?. Educational Policy, 33(1), 257–275.
66.
HughesS.Thompson DorseyD. N.CarrilloJ. F. (2016). Causation fallacy 2.0: Revisiting the myth and math of affirmative action. Educational Policy, 30(1), 63–93.
67.
HurshD. W. (2016). The end of public schools: The corporate reform agenda to privatize education. Routledge.
68.
JabbarH. (2015). Competitive networks and school leaders’ perceptions: The formation of an education marketplace in post-Katrina New Orleans. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1093–1131.
69.
JabbarH. (2016). Selling schools: Marketing and recruitment strategies in New Orleans. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(1), 4–23.
70.
JenningsJ. L. (2010). School choice or schools’ choice? Managing in an era of accountability. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 227–247.
71.
KasmanM.LoebS. (2013). Principals’ perceptions of competition for students in Milwaukee schools. Education Finance and Policy, 8(1), 43–73.
72.
Knight AbowitzK. (2008). On the public and civic purposes of education. Educational Theory, 58(3), 357–376.
73.
Knight AbowitzK. (2015). Publics for public schools: Legitimacy, democracy, and leadership. Routledge.
74.
Knight AbowitzK.KarabaR. (2010). Charter schooling and democratic justice. Educational Policy, 24(3), 534–558.
75.
KotokS.KnightD. S.JabbarH.RiveraL. E.RinconesR. (2019). On becoming a district of choice: Implications for equity along the United States–Mexico border. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(4), 615–656.
76.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7–24.
77.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.
78.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of Education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.
79.
LaFleurJ. (2020). Centring race in contemporary educational privatization policies: The genealogy of U.S. ‘private school choice’ and its implications for research. Race Ethnicity and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2020.1798384
80.
LeonardoZ. (2004). The unhappy marriage between Marxism and race critique: Political economy and the production of racialized knowledge. Policy Futures in Education, 2(3-4), 483–493.
LipmanP. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race and the right to the city. Routledge.
83.
LoebS.ValantJ.KasmanM. (2011). Increasing choice in the market for schools: Recent reforms and their effects on student achievement. National Tax Journal, 64(1), 141–163.
84.
LópezG. R. (2003). The (racially neutral) politics of education: A critical race theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 68–94.
85.
LubienskiC. (2005). Public schools in marketized environments: Shifting incentives and unintended consequences of Competition-Based Educational Reforms. American Journal of Education, 111(4), 464–486.
86.
LubienskiC. (2006). School diversification in second-best education markets: International evidence and conflicting theories of change. Educational Policy, 20(2), 323–344.
87.
LubienskiC. (2007). Marketing schools: Consumer goods and competitive incentives for consumer information. Education and Urban Society, 40(1), 118–141.
88.
LubienskiC.GulosinoC.WeitzelP. (2009). School choice and competitive incentives: Mapping the distribution of educational opportunities across local education markets. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 601–647.
89.
MacedoD.GounariP. (2015). Globalization and the unleashing of new racism: An introduction. In D. Macedo & P. Gounari (Eds.), Globalization of racism (pp. 9–41). Routledge.
90.
MadisonS. (2005). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. SAGE.
91.
MalinJ. R.HardyI.LubienskiC. (2019). Educational neoliberalization: The mediatization of ethical assertions in the voucher debate. Discourse, 40(2), 217–233.
92.
McGuinnP. (2012). Stimulating reform: Race to the top, competitive grants and the Obama education agenda. Educational Policy, 26(1), 136–159.
93.
McGuinnP. (2016). From no child left behind to the every student succeeds act: Federalism and the education legacy of the Obama administration. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 46(3), 392–415.
94.
McGuinnP. J. (2006). No Child Left behind and the transformation of federal education policy, 1965-2005. University Press of Kansas.
95.
McNeilL. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. Routledge.
96.
McWilliamsJ. A. (2017). The neighborhood school stigma: School choice, stratification, and shame. Policy Futures in Education, 15(2), 221–238.
97.
NavaJ.JonesD.KupczynskiL.MaxwellG. (2019). Superintendents’ perceptions of charter school effects on traditional public schools in South Texas. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 37(4), 1–11.
98.
NicholsS. L.BerlinerD. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Harvard Education Press.
99.
NiY. (2012). The sorting effect of charter schools on student composition in traditional public schools. Educational Policy, 26(2), 215–242.
100.
Olson BealH. K.BealB. D. (2016). Assessing the impact of school-based marketing efforts: A case study of a foreign language immersion program in a school-choice environment. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(1), 81–99.
101.
OrtnerS. B. (2006). Anthropology and social theory: Culture, power, and the acting subject. Duke University Press.
PottertonA. U. (2019). Leaders’ experiences in Arizona’s mature education market. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(1), 21–35.
104.
RavitchD. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. Vintage.
105.
RheeJ. E. (2013). The neoliberal racial project: The tiger mother and governmentality. Educational Theory, 63(6), 561–580.
106.
RichardsonL.St. PierreE. A. (2018). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 818–838). SAGE.
107.
RodaA.WellsA. S. (2013). School choice policies and racial segregation: Where white parents’ good intentions, anxiety, and privilege collide. American Journal of Education, 119(2), 261–293.
108.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
109.
ScottJ.QuinnR. (2014). The politics of education in the post-Brown era: Race, markets, and the struggle for equitable schooling. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(5), 749–763.
110.
ScottJ. T. (2011). Market-driven education reform and the racial politics of advocacy. Peabody Journal of Education, 86(5), 580–599.
111.
ScribnerS. P.FernándezÉ. (2017). Organizational politics of parental engagement: The intersections of school reform, anti-immigration policies, and Latinx parent organizing. Educational Policy, 31(6), 895–920.
112.
SerbuloL. (2019). ‘The kind of things we’ve heard keep people in the district’: White racial exclusion and the evolution of school choice policies in Portland Public Schools. Urban Studies, 56(15), 3292–3307.
113.
Siegel-HawleyG.BridgesK.ShieldsT. J. (2017). Solidifying segregation or promoting diversity? School closure and rezoning in an urban district. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(1), 107–141.
114.
SolorzanoD. G.YossoT. J. (2001). Critical race and latcrit theory and method: Counterstorytelling Chicana and Chicano graduate school experiences. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(4), 471–495.
115.
StovallD. (2015). Mayoral control: Reform, whiteness and critical race analysis of neoliberal educational policy. In PicowarB.MayorgaE. (Eds.), What’s race got to do with it?: How current school reform policy maintains racial and eco- nomic inequality (2nd ed., pp. 59–80). Peter Lang.
TuckE.GorlewskiJ. (2016). Racist ordering, settler colonialism, and edTPA: A participatory policy analysis. Educational Policy, 30(1), 197–217.
118.
TurnerE. O. (2018). Marketing diversity: Selling school districts in a racialized marketplace. Journal of Education Policy, 33(6), 793–817.
119.
ValdesF. (1997). Foreword: Under construction. LatCrit consciousness, community, and theory. California Law Review, 85, 1087.
120.
WeisL.FineM. (2004). Working method: Research and social justice. Routledge.
121.
WellsA. S.SlaytonJ.ScottJ. (2002). Defining democracy in the neoliberal age: Charter school reform and educational consumption. American Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 337–361.
122.
WeltonA.WilliamsM. (2015). Accountability strain, college readiness drain: Sociopolitical tensions involved in maintaining a college-going culture in a high “minority,” high poverty, Texas high school. The High School Journal, 98(2), 181–204.
123.
WunC. (2016). Against captivity: Black girls and school discipline policies in the afterlife of slavery. Educational Policy, 30(1), 171–196.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
