Strategic Thinkers and Positioned Choices: Parental Decision Making in Urban School Choice

Abstract

The economic logic of urban school reform holds that giving parents school choice options in an educational marketplace will lead to systemic improvements that will both resolve historical inequalities in American public schooling and will politically empower parents and urban communities. This article explores the economic logic of urban school reform policies that conceptualize parents as rational consumers of educational services and that seek normative justification for school choice as a mechanism to resolve educational inequalities and as a form of political empowerment. We do so through a qualitative research synthesis of five studies investigating the lived experiences of predominantly working-class parents of color as they navigate urban school choice. The findings from this synthesis suggest that the economic logic at work in the new politics of education obfuscates the complexity of the lived experiences of parents in urban communities. Parents hold nuanced views of urban school choice that reflect their positionality, report a limited or circumscribed form of empowerment, and express a preference for equitable learning opportunities in their locally zoned public schools.

Keywords

school choice parental decision making neoliberalism rational choice theory empowerment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(2011). Topological twists: Power’s shifting geography. Dialogues in Human Geography, 1, 283-298. doi:10.1177/2043820611421546

Apple

M. W.

(2001). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality. New York, NY: Routledge Farmer.

Apple

M. W.

(2005). Education, markets, and an audit culture. Critical Quarterly, 47, 11-29. doi:10.1111/j.0011-1562.2005.00611.x

Ferrare

J. J.

(2014). Sponsors of policy: A network analysis of wealthy elites, their affiliated philanthropies, and charter school reform in Washington state. Teachers College Record, 116, 1-25.

Ball

S. J.

(1997). Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal view of recent education policy and policy research. British Educational Research Journal, 23, 257-274. doi:10.1080/0141192970230302

Ball

S. J.

(2010). New states, new governance and new education policy. In Apple

Michael W.

Ball

Stephen J.

Ganding

Luis Armando

(Eds.) The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 155-166). New York: Routledge.

Bast

J. L.

Walberg

H. J.

(2004). Can parents choose the best schools for their children? Economics of Education Review, 23, 431-440. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2003.08.003

Bifulco

Ladd

H. F.

(2007). School choice, racial segregation, and test-scores gap: Evidence from North Carolina’s charter school program. Journal of Policy Analysis Management, 26, 31-56. doi:10.1002/pam.20226

Bourdieu

(1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7, 14-25. doi:10.2307/202060

10.

Bourdieu

(1993). Some properties of fields. In Sociology in question (pp. 72-77). London: Sage.

11.

Bourdieu

Wacquant

L. J.

(1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

12.

Buchanan

J. M.

(1972). Toward analysis of closed behavioral systems. In Buchanan

J. M.

Tollison

R. D.

(Eds.), Theory of public choice: Political applications of economics (pp. 11-26). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

13.

Buchanan

J. M.

Tullock

(1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

14.

Center for Research on Education Outcomes. (2015). Urban charter school study report on 41 regions. Available from http://credo.stanford.edu

15.

Chubb

J. E.

(2006). The private can be public. In Peterson

P. E.

(Ed.), Choice and competition in American education (pp. 13-22). Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

16.

Chubb

J. E.

Moe

T. M.

(2011). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

17.

*Cooper

C. W.

(2005). School choice and the standpoint of African American mothers: Considering the power of positionality. Journal of Negro Education, 74, 179-189. doi:10.14507/epaa.v21n81.2013

18.

*Cooper

C. W.

(2007). School choice as “motherwork”: Valuing African-American women’s educational advocacy and resistance. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20, 491-512. doi:10.1080/09518390601176655

19.

Cucchiara

M. B.

(2013). “Are we doing damage?” Choosing an urban public school in an era of parental anxiety. Anthropology & Education, 44 75-93.

20.

Cucchiara

M. B.

Horvat

E. M.

(2014). Choosing selves: The salience of parental identity in the school choice process. Journal of Education Policy, 29, 486-509.

21.

Debray-Pelot

McGuinn

(2009). The new politics of education: Analyzing the federal education policy landscape in the post-NCLB era. Educational Policy, 23, 15-42. doi:10.1177/0895904808328524

22.

Devine

(2004). Education and public choice: A critical account of the invisible hand in education. Westport, CT: Praeger.

23.

Ellison

(2014). Attack of the cyborgs: “Economics imperialism” and the human deficit in educational policy-making & research. Journal of Educational Controversy, 8, Article 7.

24.

Ellison

(2016). Neoliberalism goes to school. In Horn

(Ed.), Work hard, be hard: Journeys through “no excuses” teaching (pp. 65-92). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95. In 114th Congress.

25.

Ferrare

J. J.

Apple

M. W.

(2015). Field theory and educational practice: Bourdieu and the pedagogic qualities of local field positions in educational contexts. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45, 43-59. doi:10.1080/0305764x.2014.988682

26.

Friedman

(1982). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1962)

27.

Friedman

(1990). Free to choose: A personal statement. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.(Original work published 1980)

28.

Gleason

Clark

Tuttle

C. C.

Dwoyer

(2010). The evaluation of charter school impacts. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20104029/

29.

Hall

(1997). Introduction. In Hall

(Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 1-11). London, England: Sage.

30.

Hankins

K. B.

(2007). The final frontier: Charter schools as new community institutions of gentrification. Urban Geography, 28, 113-128.

31.

Harsanyi

J. C.

(1980). Advances in understanding rational behavior. In Essays on ethics, social behavior, and scientific explanation (pp. 89-117). Boston, US: D. Reidel Publishing Company. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-9327-9_6

32.

Hayek

F. A.

(1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35, 519-530. doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-9749-1.50005-3

33.

Hess

F. M.

(2002). Revolution at the margins: The impact of competition on urban school systems. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

34.

Huang

(2016). RQDA: R-based qualitative data analysis (R Package Version 0.2-8). Available from http://rqda.r-force.r-project.org/

35.

Kimelberg

S. M.

(2014). Beyond test scores: Middle-class mothers, cultural capital, and the evaluation of urban public schools. Sociological Perspectives, 57, 208-228.

36.

Kimelberg

S. M.

Billingham

C. M.

(2012). Attitudes toward diversity and the school choice process: Middle-class parents in a segregated urban public school district. Urban Education, 48, 198-231.

37.

Kotok

Frankenberg

Schafft

Mann

Fuller

(2015). School choice, racial segregation, and poverty concentration: Evidence from Pennsylvania charter school transfers. Educational Policy, 31, 415-447. doi:10.1177/0895904815604112

38.

Ladwig

J. G.

(1994). For whom this reform? Outlining educational policy as a social field. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15, 341-363. doi:10.1080/0142569940150303

39.

Lazear

(2000). Economic imperialism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 99-146. doi:10.1162/003355300554683

40.

Lipman

(2013). Economic crisis, accountability, and the state’s coercive assault on public education in the USA. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 557-573.

41.

Major

C. H.

Savin-Baden

(2010). An introduction to qualitative research synthesis: Managing the information explosion in social science research. New York, NY: Routledge.

42.

Maul

(2015). Review of urban charter study 2015. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/newsletter/2015/09/problems-credos-research

43.

Mirowski

(2009). Defining neoliberalism. In Mirowski

Philip

Plehwe

Dieter

(Eds.) The road from Mont Pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective (pp. 417-450). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

44.

Mirowski

(2011). The spontaneous methodology of orthodoxy, and other economists’ afflictions in the great recession. In Davis

John B.

Hands

D. Wade

(Eds.) The Elgar companion to recent economic methodology (pp. 473-513). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.

45.

Musset

(2012). School choice and equity: Current policies in OECD countries and a literature review (Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development Directorate for Education Working Paper No. 66). Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/school-choice-and-equity_5k9fq23507vc-en

46.

*Neild

R. C.

(2005). Parent management of school choice in a large urban district. Urban Education, 40, 270-297. doi:10.1177/0042085905274538

47.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6319.

48.

Noguera

P. A.

(2003). Schools, prisons, and social implications of punishment: Rethinking disciplinary practices. Theory Into Practice, 42, 341-350.

49.

Oancea

Pring

(2008). The importance of being thorough: On systematic accumulations of “what works” in education research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42, 15-39.

50.

Orfield

Frankenberg

(2013). Educational delusions? Why choice can deepen inequality and how to make schools fair. Berkeley: University of California Press.

51.

*Pattillo

(2015). Everyday politics of school choice in the black community. Du Bois Review, 12, 41-71. doi:10.1017/s1742058x15000016

52.

*Pedroni

T. C.

(2007). Market movements: African American involvement in school voucher reform. New York, NY: Routledge.

53.

Pew Research Center. (2014). Political polarization in the American public. Washington DC: Pew Research Center.

54.

Rawolle

Lingard

(2008). The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and researching education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 23, 729-741. doi:10.1080/02680930802262700

55.

Saldaña

(2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

56.

Scott

J. T.

(2013a). A Rosa Parks moment? School choice and the marketization of civil rights. Critical Studies in Education, 54, 5-18. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.739570

57.

Scott

J. T.

(2013b). School choice and the empowerment imperative. Peabody Journal of Education, 88, 60-73. doi:10.1080/0161956x.2013.752635

58.

Suri

(2013). Epistemological pluralism in research synthesis methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 889-911. doi:10.1080/09518398.2012.691565

59.

Tullock

(1972). Economic imperialism. In Buchanan

J. M.

Tollison

R. D.

(Eds.), Theory of public choice: Political applications of economics (pp. 317-329). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

60.

Walberg

H. J.

(2011). Tests, testing, and genuine school reform. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.

61.

Walberg

H. J.

Bast

J. L.

(2003). Education and capitalism: How overcoming our fear of markets and economics can improve America’s schools. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.