Although the topic of cyber-harassment in schools is one that has received significant media and research attention, much of that attention has been given to harassment against (and among) students. In this article, we examine responses from more than 5,700 public schoolteachers regarding their experiences with cyber-harassment by parents, a topic heretofore unexplored in the United States. Analyses suggest that victims of cyber-harassment are significantly more likely to teach in middle and high schools with large enrollments, be younger, and perceive their interactions with parents as largely negative. Implications for policy and future research are discussed.
AdamsK. S.ChristensonS. L. (2000). Trust and the family-school relationship: Examination of parent-teacher differences in elementary and secondary Grades. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 477-497.
2.
ArseneaultL.WalshE.TrzesniewskiK.NewcombeR.CaspiA.MoffittT. (2006). Bullying victimization uniquely contributes to adjustment problems in young children: A nationally representative cohort study. Pediatrics, 118, 130-138.
AttanucciJ. S. (2004). Questioning honor: A parent-teacher conflict over excellence and diversity in a USA urban high school. Journal of Moral Education, 33, 57-69.
6.
BarkerI. (2008, September). Are we ready for parents to watch our lessons by webcam?Times Educational Supplement, 4805, 20-21. Retrieved from EBSCOhost
7.
BlatchfordP.BassettP.BrownP. (2011). Examining the effects of class size on classroom engagement and teacher-pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and Instruction, 21, 715-730.
8.
BrownK.JacksonM.CassidyW. (2006). Cyberbullying: Developing policy to direct responses that are equitable and effective in addressing this special form of bullying. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 57, 1-36. Retrieved from EBSCOhost
9.
BuhsE.LaddG.HeraldS. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimization: Processes that mediate the relations between peer group rejection and children’s classroom engagement and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 1-13.
10.
BulachC. R.LunenbergF. C.PotterL. (2008). Creating a culture for high-performing schools: A comprehensive approach to school reform and dropout prevention. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
11.
ByronK. (2008). Carrying too heavy a load? The communication and miscommunication of emotion by email. Academy of Management Review, 33, 309-327.
12.
ChouW. S.HuntY. M.BeckjordE. B.MoserR. P.HesseB. W. (2009). Social media use in the United States: Implications for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11, 1-28.
13.
CornellD. G.MayerM. J. (2010). Why do school order and safety matter?Educational Researcher, 39, 7-15.
14.
CovingtonJ.TaylorR. B. (1991). Fear of crime in urban residential neighborhoods. The Sociological Quarterly, 32, 231-249.
15.
DeVoeJ. F.PeterK.KaufmanP.MillerA.NoonanM.SnyderT. D.DillmanD. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
16.
DillmanD. A. (1991). The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 225-249.
17.
El NokaliN. E.BachmanH. J.Votuba-DrzalE. (2010). Parent involvement and children’s academic and social development in elementary school. Child Development, 81, 988-1005.
18.
EpsteinJ. L. (2001). Schools, family and community partnerships. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
19.
EpsteinJ. L. (2010). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Kappan Magazine, 92(3), 81-96.
20.
FelterM. E. (2001). Student mathematics achievement test scores, dropout rates, and teacher characteristics. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28, 151-168.
21.
FlanneryD.WesterK.SingerM. (2004). Impact of violence exposure at school on child mental health and violent behavior. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 559-574.
22.
GottfredsonD. C.DiPietroS. M. (2011). School size, social capital, and student victimization. Sociology of Education, 84, 69-89.
23.
GottfredsonG. D.GottfredsonD. C.PayneA. A.GottfredsonN. C. (2005). School climate predictors of school disorder: Results from a National Survey of Delinquency Prevention in Schools. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 42, 412-444.
24.
HallinanM. T. (2008). Teacher influences on students’ attachment to school. Sociology of Education, 81, 271-283.
25.
HandwerkP. G.CarsonC.BlackwellK. M. (2000, May21-24). Online versus paper-and-pencil surveying of students: A case study. Paper presented at the annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Cincinnati, OH.
26.
HillN. E.TysonD. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45, 740-763.
27.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29, 1-29.
28.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2012). Cyberbullying: Neither an epidemic nor a rarity. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 539-543.
29.
HolladayJ. (2011). Cyberbullying. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 76(5), 4-9. Retrieved from EBSCOhost
30.
HorowitzM. (2009). Educator experiences with and reactions to uncomfortable and distracting e-mails (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania). Available from Dissertations and Theses: Full Text. (Publication No. AAT 3374188)
31.
HuC.WongA. L.CheahH.WongP. (2009). Patterns of email use by teachers and Implications: A Singapore experience. Computers & Education, 53, 623-631. Retrieved from EBSCOhost
32.
JeynesW. H. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40, 237-269.
33.
JonesS.FoxS. (2009). Generations online in 2009. Washington, DC: PewResearchCenter’s Internet and American Life Project.
KrosnickJ. A. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Sociology, 50, 537-567.
36.
LaddG. W. (2003). Probing the adaptive significance of children’s behavior and relationships in the school context: A child-by-environment perspective. In KailR. (Ed.), Advances in child behavior and development (pp. 43-104). New York, NY: John Wiley.
37.
LaddH. F. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 235-261.
38.
LareauA. (1989). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. London, England: Falmer Press.
39.
LareauA.Lopes MunozV. (2012). “You’re not going to call the shots”: Structural conflicts between the principal and the PTO at a suburban public elementary school. Sociology of Education, 85, 201-218.
40.
LewinC.LuckinR. (2010). Technology to support parental engagement in elementary education: Lessons learned from the UK. Computers & Education, 54, 749-758. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.010
41.
LiQ. (2008). A cross-cultural comparison of adolescents’ experience related to cyberbullying. Educational Research, 50, 223-234.
MatzC. M. (1999). Administration of web versus paper surveys: Mode effective and response rates (Master’s thesis). University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
44.
MayD.C.JohnsonJ.ChenY.HutchinsonL.RickettsM. (2010). Exploring parental aggression toward teachers in a public school setting. Current Issues in Education, 13(1), 1-34.
45.
McEwenE. K. (2005). How to deal with parents who are angry, troubled, afraid, or just plain crazy (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
46.
MeglynnF. (2005, March4). Violence against teachers drops after crackdown. Education Reporter, p. 11.
47.
MillerC. (2006). Cyber-harassment. Law Enforcement Technology, 33(4), 26. Retrieved from EBSCOhost
NishinaA.JuvonenJ.WitkowM. R. (2005). Sticks and stonesmaybreak my bones, but names will make me feel sick: The psychosocial, somatic, and scholastic consequences of peer harassment. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 34, 37-48.
52.
OlweusD. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
53.
OlweusD. (2012). Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 520-538.
54.
PatchinJ. W.HindujaS. (2010). Cyberbullying and self-esteem. Journal of School Health, 80, 614-621.
55.
PomerantzE. M.MoormanE. A.LitwackS. D. (2007). The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77, 373-410.
56.
PurcellK. (2011). Search and email still top the list of most popular online activities: Two activities nearly universal among adult Internet users. Washington, DC: PewResearchCenter’s Internet and American Life Project.
57.
RenzulliL. A.ParrottH. M.BeattieI. R. (2011). Racial mismatch and school type: Teacher satisfaction and retention in charter and traditional Schools. Sociology of Education, 84, 23-48.
58.
RobersS.ZhangJ.TrumanJ.SnyderT. D. (2012). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2011. Washington, DC: NationalCenter for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
59.
SaxL. J.GilmartinS. K.BryantA. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44, 409-431.
StewartL. (2009). Achievement differences between large and small schools in Texas. The Rural Educator, 30, 20-28.
63.
St. John-BrooksC. (2001, July). Mutual respect will tame pit-bull parents. Times Educational Supplement, 4437, 23.
64.
SundaramV.Helweg-LarsenK.LarsenB.BjerregaardP. (2004). Physical violence, self-rated health, and morbidity: Is gender significant for victimization?Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 58, 65-70.
65.
TomsicM. L.HendelD.D.MatrossR. P. (2000, May21-24). A world wide web response to student satisfaction surveys: Comparisons using paper and Internet formats. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Cincinnati, OH.
66.
TrumpK. S.MooreA. (Eds.). (2001). Deal effectively with hostile visitors to the front office. Inside School Safety, 6(2), 1-10.
67.
VanceJ. W. (2010). Cyber-harassment in higher education: Online learning environments. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 71. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.com
68.
WhittyM. T.CarrA. N. (2006). New rules in the workplace: Applying object-relations theory to explain problem Internet and email behavior in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 235-250.
YbarraM. L. (2004). Linkages between depressive symptomatology and Internet harassment among young regular Internet users. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 247-257.
71.
YbarraM. L.MitchellJ. K. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1308-1316.
72.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK.WolakJ.FinkelhorD. (2006). Examining characteristics and associated distress related to Internet harassment: Findings from the second youth Internet safety survey. Pediatrics, 118, 1169-1177.
73.
ZickuhrK.SmithA. (2012). Digital differences: Why increased internet adoption and the rise of mobile connectivity have reduced many gaps in technology over the past decade, for some groups digital disparities still remain. Washington, DC: PewResearchCenter’s Internet and American Life Project.
