Educational policies have increasingly promoted parental involvement as a mechanism for improving student outcomes. Few jurisdictions have provided funding for this priority. In Ontario, Canada, the province’s Parents Reaching Out Grants program allows parents to apply for funding for a parental involvement initiative that addresses a local barrier to parent participation. This study categorizes initiatives (N = 11,171) amounting to approximately 10 million dollars (Can$) in funding from 2009 to 2014 and compares them across school settings. Although results show several key contextual differences, parents across settings identify relatively similar needs for enabling parental involvement, emphasizing parenting approaches for supporting well-being (e.g., nutrition, mental health, and technology use) and skills for home-based learning. However, Epstein’s widely used parental involvement typology conceals these prominent aspects of parental involvement. A modified model of parental involvement is presented that may serve as a guide for enhancing parent participation.
AgronickG.ClarkA.O’DonnellL.StueveA. (2009). Parent involvement strategies in urban middle and high schools in the northeast and islands region. Issues & Answers (REL 2009-No. 069). Waltham, MA: Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands.
2.
AnisefP.LanphierC. M. (2003). The world in a city. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
3.
AuerbachS. (2007). From moral supporters to struggling advocates. Urban Education, 42, 250-283.
4.
BallengerJ. (2009). Parental involvement: Low socio-economic status (SES) and ethnic minority parents’ struggle for recognition and identity. In JenlinkP. M.TownesF.H. (Eds.), The struggle for identity in today’s schools: Cultural recognition in a time of increasing diversity (pp. 156-168). Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
5.
Baquedano-LópezP.AlexanderR. A.HernándezS. J. (2013). Equity issues in parental and community involvement in schools what teacher educators need to know. Review of Research in Education, 37, 149-182.
6.
BarleyZ. A.BeesleyA. D. (2007). Rural school success: What can we learn?Journal of Research in Rural Education, 22, 1-16.
7.
BauchP. A.GoldringE. B. (1995). Parent involvement and school responsiveness: Facilitating the home-school connection in schools of choice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(1), 1-21.
8.
BeasleyT. M.SchumackerR. E. (1995). Multiple regression approach to analyzing contingency tables: Post hoc and planned comparison procedures. The Journal of Experimental Education, 64(1), 79-93.
9.
BrockS.EdmundsA. L. (2010). Parental involvement: Barriers and opportunities. Educational Administration and Foundations Journal, 21(1), 48-59.
10.
BrykA.LeeV.HollandP. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
CatsambisS. (2001). Expanding knowledge of parental involvement in children’s secondary education: Connections with high school seniors’ academic success. Social Psychology of Education, 5, 149-177.
13.
ChmielewskiK. (2014). An international comparison of achievement inequality in within- and between-school tracking systems. American Journal of Education, 120, 293-324.
14.
ColemanJ. S.HofferT. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities. New York, NY: Basic Books.
15.
CrosbyS. A.RasinskiT.PadakN.YildirimK. (2015). A 3-year study of a school-based parental involvement program in early literacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 108, 165-172.
16.
DarlingS.WestbergL. (2004). Parent involvement in children’s acquisition of reading. The Reading Teacher, 57, 774-776.
17.
DaviesS. (2012). Are there Catholic school effects in Ontario, Canada?European sociological review, 29, 871-883.
18.
DearingE.KreiderH.SimpkinsS.WeissH. B. (2006). Family involvement in school and low-income children’s literacy performance: Longitudinal associations between and within families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 653-664.
19.
de CarvalhoM. E. (2001). Rethinking family school relations: A critique of parental involvement in schooling. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.
20.
DenessenE.BakkerJ.GierveldM. (2007). Multi-ethnic schools’ parental involvement policies and practices. School Community Journal, 17(2), 27-43.
21.
EliasM. J.PatrikakouE. N.WeissbergR. P. (2007). A competence-based framework for parent–school–community partnerships in secondary schools. School Psychology International, 28, 540-554.
22.
EpsteinJ. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 701-712.
23.
EpsteinJ. L. (2010). School, family and community partnerships. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
24.
FanX.ChenM. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1-22.
25.
FensterwaldJ. (2013, May2). California looks to Ontario schools’ reformer for guidance. EdSource. Available from www.Edsource.org
26.
FlessaJ.GregoireH. (2012). Policy aspirations and dilemmas of implementation: Leadership for partnerships in Ontario, Canada. In AuerbachS. (Ed.), School leadership for authentic family and community partnerships: Research perspectives for transforming practice (pp. 115-132). New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
FrewL.ZhouQ.DuranJ.KwokO.BenzM. (2013). Effect of school-initiated parent outreach activities on parent involvement in school events. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 24, 27-35.
28.
GidneyR. D. (1999). From hope to Harris: The reshaping of Ontario’s schools. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
29.
GreenC. L.WalkerJ. M.Hoover-DempseyK. V.SandlerH. M. (2007). Parents’ motivations for involvement in children’s education: An empirical test of a theoretical model of parental involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 532-544.
30.
HamlinD.DaviesS. (2016). Toronto: A new global city of learning. London Review of Education, 14(2), 186-198.
31.
HamlinD.CameronD.WatkinsE. (2016). Ontario’s guidance counsellors: Spread thinly in an environment of growing expectations. Toronto, ON: People for Education.
32.
HandsC. (2013). Including all families in education: School district-level efforts to promote parent engagement in Ontario, Canada. Teaching Education, 24, 134-149.
33.
HarrisA.GoodallJ. (2008). Do parents know they matter? Engaging all parents in learning. Educational Research, 50, 277-289.
34.
HendersonA. T.MappK. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
35.
HornbyG.LafaeleR. (2011). Barriers to parental involvement in education: An explanatory model. Educational Review, 63, 37-52.
36.
Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994, 20 U.S. C. § 1116 (1994).
37.
JamesC. E.SaulR. (2007). Urban schooling in suburban contexts: Exploring the immigrant factor in urban education. In PinkW. T.NoblitG. W. (Eds.), International handbook of urban education (pp. 841-858). The Netherlands: Springer.
38.
JeynesW. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban primary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40, 237-269.
39.
JeynesW. (2010). The salience of the subtle aspects of parental involvement and encouraging that involvement: Implications for school-based programs. Teachers College Record, 112, 747-774.
40.
JeynesW. (2011). Parental involvement and academic success. New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
JeynesW. (2012). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of different types of parental involvement programs for urban students. Urban Education, 47, 706-742.
42.
KushmanJ. W.BarnhardtR. (2001). Reforming education from the inside-out: A study of community engagement and educational reform in rural Alaska. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 17, 12-26.
43.
LadkyM.PetersonS. S. (2008). Successful practices for immigrant parent involvement: An Ontario perspective. Multicultural Perspectives, 10(2), 82-89.
44.
LareauA. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
LightfootD. (2004). Some parents just don’t care. Urban Education, 39, 91-107.
46.
MaX.ShenJ.KrennH. Y. (2014). The relationship between parental involvement and adequate yearly progress among urban, suburban, and rural schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25, 629-650.
47.
MattinglyD. J.PrislinR.McKenzieT. L.RodriguezJ. L.KayzarB. (2002). Evaluating evaluations: The case of parent involvement programs. Review of Educational Research, 72, 549-576.
48.
MenardS. (2009). Logistic regression: From introductory to advanced concepts and applications. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
49.
MeyerJ. A.MannM. B. (2006). Teachers’ perceptions of the benefits of home visits for early elementary children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34, 93-97.
50.
MichelsonW. (2006). Metropolitan government and the social ecology of minority residential distribution: The experience of Toronto. In FongE. (Ed.), Inside the mosaic (pp. 76-98). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
51.
MourshedM.ChijiokeC.BarberM. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey & Company.
52.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 1118 (2002).
53.
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2010). Parents in Partnership: A Parent Engagement Policy for Ontario Schools, 2010. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2010). Ontario, Canada: Reform to support high achievement in a diverse context. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46580959.pdf
57.
ParkH. J. (2006). Parental involvement and educational outcomes: The significance of institutional arrangements of educational system. In BakerD. P.WisemanA. W. (Eds.), International Perspectives on Education and Society, Vol. 7: The impact of comparative education research on institutional theory (pp. 187-208). Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Group.
58.
RahY.ChoiS.NguyễnT. S. T. (2009). Building bridges between refugee parents and schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12, 347-365.
59.
RobinsonK.HarrisA. (2014). The broken compass: Parental involvement with children’s education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
SchutzA. (2006). Home is a prison in the global city: The tragic failure of school-based community engagement strategies. Review of Educational Research, 76, 691-743.
61.
SemkeC. A.SheridanS. M. (2012). Family-school connections in rural educational settings: A systematic review of the empirical literature. School Community Journal, 22, 21-47.
62.
SheldonS. B. (2002). Parents’ social networks and beliefs as predictors of parent involvement. The Primary School Journal, 102, 301-316.
63.
ShiffmanC. D. (2013). The Juggling Act Navigating Parent Involvement in the Welfare Reform Era. Educational Policy, 27(1), 64-91.
64.
SimonB. S. (2004). High school outreach and family involvement. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 185-209.
65.
SmithJ. G. (2006). Parental involvement in education among low-income families: A case study. School Community Journal, 16, 43-56.
66.
SmithJ.WohlstetterP.KuzinC. A.De PedroK. (2011). Parent involvement in urban charter schools: New strategies for increasing participation. School Community Journal, 21(1), 71-94.
