With growing evidence that human capital investment is more efficiently spent on younger children coupled with wide variation in preschool access across states, this article uses a neoliberal approach to examine the potential social costs and benefits that could accrue should the United States decide to implement a centralized preschool accountability system. Conceptual agency-based arguments that support implementing a preschool accountability system are compared and contrasted with conceptual arguments that oppose centralized accountability. In spite of credible conceptual arguments that local control over preschool access maximizes efficiency, we find the most support for an accountability system that enhances equity through universal access to preschool.
Baker, B.D., & Green, P.C. ( 2008). Conceptions of equity and adequacy in school finance . In H. F. Ladd & E. B. Fiske (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy. New York: Routledge. 203-221.
2.
Ballou, D. ( 2001). Pay for performance in public and private schools . Economics of Education Review, 20, 51-61.
3.
Barnett, W.S., Epstein, D.J., Friedman, A.H., Boyd, J.S., & Hstedt, J.T. ( 2008). The state of preschool 2008. New Brunswick, NJ: The National Institute for Early Education Research at Rutgers University.
4.
Bifulco, R., & Bretschneider, S. (2001). Measuring school efficiency: An evaluation of methods using simulated data. Economics of Education Review, 20, 417-429.
5.
Bifulco, R., & Duncombe, W. ( 2002). Evaluating school performance: Are we ready for prime time? In W. Fowler, Jr. (Ed.), Developments in school finance, 1999-2000 (pp. 9-28). Washington, DC : National Center for Educational Statistics.
6.
Boocock, S.S. ( 2003). Lessons from Europe: European preschools revisited in a global age. In Early childhood programs for a new century . Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America. 299-328.
7.
Brint, S., & Teele, S. ( 2008). Professionalism under siege: Teachers’ views of NCLB. In A. Sadovnik, J. O’Day, G. Bohrnstedt , & K. Borman (Eds.), No Child Left Behind and the reduction of the achievement gap (pp. 131-152). New York: Routledge.
Currie, J. ( 2001). Early childhood education programs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 213-238.
10.
Data Quality Campaign. (2009). 10 State Actions to Ensure Effective Data Use. Accessed at: http://www.dataqualitycampaign.org/survey/actions.
11.
Figlio, D.N. ( 2006). Testing, crime and punishment. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 837-851.
12.
Figlio, D.N., & Ladd, H.F. ( 2008). School accountability and student achievement . In H. F. Ladd & E. B. Fiske (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy. New York: Routledge . 166-182.
13.
Frede, E.C. ( 1995). The role of program quality in producing early childhood program benefits. The Future of Children, 5(3), 115-132.
14.
Fruchter, N. ( 2007). Urban schools public will: Making education work for all our children. New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
Hanushek, E., & Raymond, M. ( 2005). Does school accountability lead to improved school performance ? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 297-329.
16.
Heckman, J.J. ( 2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312, 1900-1902.
17.
Heckman, J.J., Moon, S.H., Pinto, R., Savelyev, P.A., & Yavitz, A. ( 2009). The rate of return to the HighScope Perry Preschool Program . Journal of Public Economics, 94, 114-128.
18.
Ladd, H.F. ( 2010). Education Inspectorate Systems in New Zealandand theNetherlands . Education Finance and Policy Summer 2010, Vol. 5, No. 3: 378-392.
19.
Lauren, D.L. ( 2008). False promises: The school choice provisions in NCLB . In A. Sadovnik, J. O’Day, G. Bohrnstedt , & K. Borman (Eds.), No Child Left Behind and the reduction of the achievement gap (pp. 203-226). New York: Routledge.
20.
Levin, H.M. ( 2008). Issues in educational privatization. In H. F. Ladd & E. B. Fiske (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy. New York: Routledge . 391-401.
21.
Lipman, P. ( 2003) High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York: Routledge Falmer.
22.
McEwan, P. ( 2008). Can schools reduce the indigenous test score gap? Evidence from Chile. Journal of Development Studies, 44, 1506-1530.
23.
Meier, D. ( 2002). In schools we trust. Boston : Beacon.
24.
Mikelson, R.A., & Southworth, S. (2008). When school choice leaves many children behind: Implications for NCLB from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. In A. Sadovnik, J. O’Day, G. Bohrnstedt , & K. Borman (Eds.), No Child Left Behind and the reduction of the achievement gap (pp. 227-241). New York: Routledge.
25.
Musgrave, R.A. ( 1959). The theory of public finance: A study in political economy . New York: McGraw-Hill .
26.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. ( 2008). Overview of NAEYC Early Childhood Program standards . Washington, DC: Author. Available from http://www.naeyc.org/files/academy/file/OverviewStandards.pdf .
27.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110.
28.
Oates, W.E. ( 1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1120-1149.
29.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. ( 2006). Education at a Glance 2008: OECD Indicators. Table C 2.1 Enrollment rates, by age. Accessed at: http://www.oecd.org/edu/eag2008
30.
Rainwater, L., & Smeeding, T.M. (2003). Poor kids in a rich country . New York: Russell Sage.
31.
Rubenstein, R., Schwartz, A.E., Stiefel, L., & Amor, H.B.J. ( 2007). From districts to schools: The distribution of resources across schools in big city school districts. Economics of Education Review, 26, 532-545.
32.
Stiefel, L., Schwartz, A., & Rubenstein, R. (1999). Measuring school-level efficiency. In M. E. Goertz & A. Odden (Eds.), School-based budgeting (pp. 40-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
33.
Tietze, W., Cryer, D., Bairrão, J., Palacios, J., & Wetzel, G. ( 1996). Comparisons of observed process quality in early child care and education programs in five countries. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11, 447-475.
34.
U.S. Department of Education . (2004). Stronger accountability. Washington, DC: Author. Available from http://www.2.ed.gov/nclb/accountability/ayp/testing-faq.html#4
35.
U.S.Department of Health and Human Services. ( 1996). Head Start Program Performance Standards and Other Regulations . Washington,DC. Available from http://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/hslc/Program%20Design%20and%20Management/Head%20Start%20Requirements/Head%20Start%20Requirements
