Performing Productivity: Exploring the Narratives of State-Funded AI Projects Over a Decade in Chile

Abstract

Public funding plays a pivotal yet often overlooked role in shaping AI development, especially in Latin America. Drawing on sociological theories of performativity, we analyze 205 AI projects funded by Chile’s key public agencies, related to research, entrepreneurship, and creation, over the past decade. Through content analysis combined with a qualitative, heuristic procedure, we characterize five dominant narratives across state-funded AI projects, seeking to interpret the social meanings embedded within their descriptions considering their situated context. This method informs the articulation of five narratives: AI for productivity gains, as a transformative force, as a literacy need, for smart surveillance, and as situated and creative inquiry. Our findings reveal that AI for productivity gains has strongly dominated over the last decade. We argue that this narrative functions as a strategic mechanism for aligning legacy institutional interests with those of the actors seeking funding. By framing public funding as performative, this paper contributes to debates on how state-led narratives help shape technological development’s trajectory. It also emphasizes the interconnectedness of actors, political economy, and socio-technical dynamics concerning AI’s future.

Keywords

AI narratives performativity funding policy Chile global south

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abeliuk

Gutiérrez

(2021). Historia y evolución de la inteligencia artificial. Revista Bits de Ciencia, 21, 14–21.

Ahumada

R. N.

(2016). La Corporación de Fomento a la Producción y la modernización económica de Chile. 1939-1970. Revista de gestión pública, 5(2), 283–316.

Akrich

Callon

Latour

Monaghan

(2002). The key to success in innovation part I: The art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(02), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919602000550

Austin

J. L.

(1962). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.

Bareis

Katzenbach

(2022). Talking AI into being: The narratives and imaginaries of national AI strategies and their performative politics. Science, Technology & Human Values, 47(5), 855–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211030007

Block

F. L.

Keller

M. R.

(2015). State of innovation: The US government's role in technology development. Routledge.

Boettger

R. K.

Palmer

L. A.

(2010). Quantitative content analysis: Its use in technical communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53(4), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2010.2077450

Brandusescu

(2021). Artificial intelligence policy and funding in Canada: Public investments, private interests. Private Interests.

Bromley

Powell

W. W.

(2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.684462

10.

Butler

(2010). Performative agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2010.494117

11.

Callon

(1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1), 196–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1984.tb00113.x

12.

Callon

(2009). Elaborating the notion of performativity. Le libellio d'AEGIS, 5(1), 18–29.

13.

Catone

M. C.

Diana

(2019). Narrative in social research: Narrative in social research. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(2), 14–34.

14.

Cave

Dihal

Dillon

(Eds.), (2020). AI narratives: A history of imaginative thinking about intelligent machines. Oxford University Press.

15.

Chang

H.-J.

(2007). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. Anthem Press.

16.

Coeckelbergh

(2021). Time machines: Artificial intelligence, process, and narrative. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 1623–1638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00479-y

17.

Corvalán

J. G.

(2017). Administración Pública digital e inteligente: Transformaciones en la era de la inteligencia artificial. Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental, 8(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.7213/rev.dir.econ.soc.v8i2.19321

18.

Eubanks

(2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press.

19.

Evans

P. B.

(1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press.

20.

Faúndez-Ugalde

Mellado-Silva

Aldunate-Lizana

(2020). Use of artificial intelligence by tax administrations: An analysis regarding taxpayers’ rights in Latin American countries. Computer Law & Security Review, 38, Article 105441.

21.

Fermandois

(2002). El sistema CORFO y la época del “subsidio” en Chile, 1939-1973. Bicentenario, 1(2), 23.

22.

Filgueiras

(2023). Designing artificial intelligence policy: Comparing design spaces in Latin America. Latin American Policy, 14(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12282

23.

Futures of Artificial Intelligence Research . (2025). Performing productivity: Exploring the narratives of state-funded AI projects over a decade in Chile [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15725085

24.

Garcia Alonso

Thoene

Davila Benavides

(2022). Digital health and artificial intelligence: Advancing healthcare provision in Latin America. IT Professional, 24(2), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2022.3143530

25.

Gardner

Smith

A. L.

Steventon

Coughlan

Oldfield

(2022). Ethical funding for trustworthy AI: Proposals to address the responsibilities of funders to ensure that projects adhere to trustworthy AI practice. AI and Ethics, 2(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00069-w

26.

Gray

Jones

M. D.

(2016). A qualitative narrative policy framework? Examining the policy narratives of US campaign finance regulatory reform. Public Policy and Administration, 31(3), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715623356

27.

Guendez

A. A.

Mettler

(2023). Strategically constructed narratives on artificial intelligence: What stories are told in governmental artificial intelligence policies? Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101719

28.

Hagendorff

(2020). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8

29.

Hermann

(2023). Artificial intelligence in fiction: Between narratives and metaphors. AI & Society, 38(1), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01299-6

30.

Houser

K. A.

Raymond

A. H.

(2020). It is time to move beyond the AI race narrative: Why investment and international cooperation must win the day. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 18, 129.

31.

Humeres

Gil

(2024). Dreaming of a bright future: Statistics, disaster, and the birth of energopolitics in 1930s Chile. Technology and Culture, 65(2), 571–602. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a926316

32.

Kak

(2020). “The Global South is everywhere, but also always somewhere.” national policy narratives and AI justice. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and society (pp. 307–312). Association for Computing Machinery.

33.

Lamont

Beljean

Clair

(2014). What is missing? Cultural processes and causal pathways to inequality. Socio-Economic Review, 12(3), 573–608. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu011

34.

MacKenzie

(2006). Is economics performative? Option theory and the construction of derivatives markets. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710500509722

35.

MacKenzie

(2008). An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. MIT Press.

36.

Mazzucato

(2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. Private sector myths. Anthem Press.

37.

Medina

(2011). Cybernetic revolutionaries: Technology and politics in Allende's Chile. MIT Press.

38.

Medina

Marques

I. C.

Holmes

(2014). Beyond imported magic.

39.

Ministry of Science, Technology, Knowledge and Innovation . (2021). Decreto 20 | Aprueba Política Nacional de Inteligencia artificial. https://www.leychile.cl/navegar?idNorma=1169399

40.

Morgan

D. L.

(1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research, 3(1), 112Y121. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239300300107

41.

Natale

Ballatore

(2020). Imagining the thinking machine: Technological myths and the rise of artificial intelligence. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 26(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517715164

42.

Nelson

(2004). The challenge of building an effective innovation system for catch-up. Oxford Development Studies, 32(3), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360081042000260575

43.

Ohrvik

(2024). What is close reading? An exploration of a methodology. Rethinking History, 28(2), 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2024.2345001

44.

Olavarría-Gambi

(2016). Agenda and public policy: Evidence from Chile. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(2), 157–172.

45.

Paltieli

(2022). The political imaginary of National AI Strategies. AI & Society, 37(4), 1613–1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01258-1

46.

Peirce

C. S.

(1998). Chance, love, and logic: Philosophical essays. University of Nebraska Press.

47.

Polanyi

(1971). The great transformation. Beacon Press. (Original work published 1944).

48.

Polkinghorne

(1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Suny Press.

49.

Roberge

Senneville

Morin

(2020). How to translate artificial intelligence? Myths and justifications in public discourse. Big Data & Society, 7(1), Article 205395172091996. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720919968

50.

Sartori

Bocca

(2023). Minding the gap(s): Public perceptions of AI and socio-technical imaginaries. AI & Society, 38(2), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01422-1

51.

Sartori

Theodorou

(2022). A sociotechnical perspective for the future of AI: Narratives, inequalities, and human control. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09624-3

52.

Silva

(2015). In the name of reason: Technocrats and politics in Chile. Penn State Press.

53.

UNESCO . (2024). Chile launches a national AI policy and presents a bill on AI following UNESCO's recommendations. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/es/articles/chile-lanza-una-politica-nacional-de-ia-y-presenta-un-proyecto-de-ley-sobre-ia-siguiendo-las

54.

Valkenburg

(2020). Consensus or contestation: Reflections on governance of innovation in a context of Heterogeneous knowledge. Science, Technology and Society, 25(2), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721820903005