To examine the relationships among health literacy, risk perceptions, COVID-19 information overload, health information seeking, and race/ethnicity.
Design
A cross-sectional non-probability community survey conducted between December 2020 and January 2021. A questionnaire was developed in collaboration with a local minority health task force.
Setting
Albany, New York, USA.
Sample
331 adults residing in Albany, NY and neighboring areas (80.3% completion rate).
Measures
Multi-item scales were used to measure health literacy, perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, information overload, and health information seeking frequency and types.
Analysis
We conducted multivariate regression analysis.
Results
Health literacy (standardized β = −.33, P < .001) and perceived severity (β = −.23, P < .001) were negatively associated with information overload. Information overload was negatively associated with health information seeking frequency (β = −.16, P < .05) and types (β = −.19, P < .01). A further analysis shows several factors, including information overload and race (African Americans), were negatively related to seeking specific types of information.
Conclusion
We find that low health literacy and perceived severity contribute to information overload and that information overload adversely affects health information seeking. Black individuals are less likely to search for certain types of information. The cross-sectional study design limits our ability to determine causality. Future research should employ panel data to determine the directionality of the observed relationships.
AdolphCAmanoKBang-JensenB, et al.Governor partisanship explains the adoption of statewide mask mandates in response to COVID-19. State Polit Pol Q. 2022;22(1):24-49. doi:10.1017/spq.2021.22.
3.
BolsenTPalmR. Politicization and COVID-19 vaccine resistance in the U.S. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science. 2022;188(1):81-100. doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.10.002
4.
WilsonTD. Information overload: implications for healthcare services. Health Inf J. 2001;7(2):112-117. doi:10.1177/146045820100700210
5.
ChaeJLeeCJensenJD. Correlates of cancer information overload: focusing on individual ability and motivation. Health Commun. 2016;31(5):626-634. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.986026
6.
MaoBJiaXHuangQ. How do information overload and message fatigue reduce information processing in the era of COVID-19? An ability–motivation approach. J Inf Sci2022;01655515221118047. doi:10.1177/01655515221118047
7.
GardikiotisAMalinakiECharisiadis-TsitlakidisC, et al.Emotional and cognitive responses to COVID-19 information overload under lockdown predict media attention and risk perceptions of COVID-19. J Health Commun. 2021;26(6):434-442. doi:10.1080/10810730.2021.1949649
8.
HuangQMaoBJiaXPengW. COVID-19 information overload mediated the effects of cross-channel information differences on health information elaboration. J Health Commun. 2023;28(7):401-411. doi:10.1080/10810730.2023.2217097
9.
JensenJDCarcioppoloNKingAJ, et al.Including limitations in news coverage of cancer research: effects of news hedging on fatalism, medical skepticism, patient trust, and backlash. J Health Commun. 2011;16(5):486-503. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.546491
10.
JensenJDLiuMCarcioppoloNJohnKKKrakowMSunY. Health information seeking and scanning among US adults aged 50–75 years: testing a key postulate of the information overload model. Health Inf J. 2017;23(2):96-108. doi:10.1177/1460458215627290
11.
SoJAhnJGuanM. Beyond depth and breadth: taking “types” of health information sought into consideration with cluster analysis. J Health Commun. 2022;0(0):1-10. doi:10.1080/10810730.2022.2029978
12.
FareedNSwobodaCMJonnalagaddaPWalkerDMHuertaTR. Differences between races in health information seeking and trust over time: evidence from a cross-sectional, pooled analyses of HINTS data. Am J Health Promot. 2021;35(1):84-92. doi:10.1177/0890117120934609
13.
DinHNMcDaniels-DavidsonCNodoraJMadanatH. Profiles of a health information–seeking population and the current digital divide: cross-sectional analysis of the 2015-2016 California health interview survey. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(5):e11931. doi:10.2196/11931
14.
MasseyPM. Where do U.S. Adults who do not use the Internet get health information? Examining digital health information disparities from 2008 to 2013. J Health Commun. 2016;21(1):118-124. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1058444
15.
MasseyPMLangellierBASentellTManganelloJ. Nativity and language preference as drivers of health information seeking: examining differences and trends from a U.S. population-based survey. Ethn Health. 2017;22(6):596-609. doi:10.1080/13557858.2016.1244745
16.
ShermanLDGoidelKBergeronCDSmithML. Web-based health information seeking among african American and hispanic men living with chronic conditions: cross-sectional survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(7):e26180. doi:10.2196/26180
17.
EpplerMJMengisJ. The concept of information overload: a review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Inf Soc. 2004;20(5):325-344. doi:10.1080/01972240490507974
18.
RatzanSCParkerRM. Introduction. In: SeldenCRZornMRatzanSCParkerRM, eds. National Library of Medicine Current Bibliographies in Medicine: Health Literacy. National Instittues of Health. MD, USA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.
19.
CrookBStephensKKPastorekAEMackertMDonovanEE. Sharing health information and influencing behavioral intentions: the role of health literacy, information overload, and the Internet in the diffusion of healthy heart information. Health Commun. 2016;31(1):60-71. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.936336
20.
JanzNKBeckerMH. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984;11(1):1-47. doi:10.1177/109019818401100101
21.
WitteKCameronKAMcKeonJKBerkowitzJM. Predicting risk behaviors: development and validation of a diagnostic scale. J Health Commun. 1996;1(4):317-342. doi:10.1080/108107396127988
22.
KahlorL. PRISM: a planned risk information seeking model. Health Commun. 2010;25(4):345-356. doi:10.1080/10410231003775172
23.
BlochPHRichinsML. A theoretical model for the study of product importance perceptions. J Market. 1983;47(3):69-81. doi: 10.1177/002224298304700308
24.
BruwerJCohenJ. Restaurants and wine by-the-glass consumption: motivational process model of risk perception, involvement and information-related behaviour. Int J Hospit Manag. 2019;77:270-280. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.07.006
25.
DholakiaUM. A motivational process model of product involvement and consumer risk perception. Eur J Market. 2001;35(11/12):1340-1362. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006479
26.
HuangYYangC. A metacognitive approach to reconsidering risk perceptions and uncertainty: understand information seeking during COVID-19. Sci Commun. 2020;42(5):616-642. doi:10.1177/1075547020959818
27.
ChaeJ. Who avoids cancer information? Examining a psychological process leading to cancer information avoidance. J Health Commun. 2016;21(7):837-844. doi:10.1080/10810730.2016.1177144
28.
HuangQLeiSNiB. Perceived information overload and unverified information sharing on WeChat amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a moderated mediation model of anxiety and perceived herd. Front Psychol. 2022;13. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837820
29.
AhnJKimHKKahlorLAAtkinsonLNohG-Y. The impact of emotion and government trust on individuals’ risk information seeking and avoidance during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-country comparison. J Health Commun. 2021;26(10):728-741. doi:10.1080/10810730.2021.1999348
30.
NiederdeppeJHornikRCKellyBJ, et al.Examining the dimensions of cancer-related information seeking and scanning behavior. Health Commun. 2007;22(2):153-167. doi:10.1080/10410230701454189
31.
ShimMKellyBHornikR. Cancer information scanning and seeking behavior is associated with knowledge, lifestyle choices, and screening. J Health Commun. 2006;11(sup001):157-172. doi:10.1080/10810730600637475
32.
HongT. The Internet and tobacco cessation: the roles of Internet self-efficacy and search task on the information-seeking process. J Computer-Mediated Commun. 2006;11(2):536-556. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00026.x
33.
LenzERInformation seeking: a component of client decisions and health behavior. ANS. Advances in Nursing Science. 1984;6(3):59-72. doi: 10.1097/00012272-198404000-00010
34.
SoJKuangKChoH. Information seeking upon exposure to risk messages: predictors, outcomes, and mediating roles of health information seeking. Commun Res. 2019;46(5):663-687. doi:10.1177/0093650216679536
35.
DadaczynskiKOkanOMesserMet al.Digital health literacy and web-based information-seeking behaviors of university students in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1):e24097. doi: 10.2196/24097
36.
HartoonianNOrmsethSRHansonERBantumEOOwenJE. Information-seeking in cancer survivors: application of the comprehensive model of information seeking to HINTS 2007 data. J Health Commun. 2014;19(11):1308-1325. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.872730
Price-HaywoodEGBurtonJFortDSeoaneLHospitalization and mortality among Black patients and white patients with covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(26):2534-2543. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa2011686
39.
vandeGraafDLVlooswijkCBolN, et al.AYAs’ online information and eHealth needs: a comparison with healthcare professionals’ perceptions. Cancer Med. 2023;12(2):2016-2026. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5048
40.
CaldwellEPKillingsworthEE. The online use of the newest vital sign in adolescents. Clin Nurs Res. 2022;31(1):55-59. doi:10.1177/10547738211021423
41.
PatelPJJoelSRovenaG, et al.Testing the utility of the newest vital sign (NVS) health literacy assessment tool in older African-American patients. Patient Educ Counsel. 2011;85(3):505-507. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.03.014
KahnJRPearlinLI. Financial strain over the life course and health among older adults. J Health Soc Behav. 2006;47(1):17-31.
44.
LüdeckeDBartelASchwemmerCPowellCDjalovskiATitzJ. sjPlot: data visualization for statistics in social science (2.8.10). [Computer software]; 2021. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot
45.
LambertSDLoiselleCG. Health information seeking behavior. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(8):1006-1019. doi:10.1177/1049732307305199
46.
MartinLTRuderTEscarceJJ, et al.Developing predictive models of health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(11):1211-1216. doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1105-7.
47.
ChewL.D.BradleyK.A.BoykoE.J.Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Family Medicine2004;36(8):588-594.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
