Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

How do people decide which risks they want to get informed about? The present study examines the role of the availability and affect heuristics on these decisions. Participants (N = 100, aged 19–72 years) selected for which of 23 cancers they would like to receive an information brochure, reported the number of occurrences of each type of cancer in their social circle (availability), and rated their dread reaction to each type of cancer (affect); they also made relative judgments about which of 2 cancers was more common in Germany (judged risk). Participants tended to choose information brochures for those cancers for which they indicated a higher availability within their social networks as well as for cancers they dreaded. Mediation analyses suggested that the influence of availability and affect on information choice was only partly mediated by judged risk. The results demonstrate the operation of 2 key judgment heuristics (availability and affect), previously studied in risk perception, also in decisions about information choice. We discuss how our findings can be used to identify which risks are likely to fall from people’s radar.

Keywords

information seeking risk perception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anker

Reinhart

Feeley

. Health information seeking: a review of measures and methods. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82:346–54.

Kahlor

. PRISM: a planned risk information seeking model. Health Commun. 2010;25:345–56.

Rutten

Squiers

Hesse

. Cancer-related information seeking: hints from the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). J Health Commun. 2006;11(suppl 1):147–56.

Hovick

Freimuth

Johnson-Turbes

Chervin

. Multiple health risk perception and information processing among African Americans and whites living in poverty. Risk Anal. 2011;31:1789–99.

Huurne

Gutteling

. Information needs and risk perception as predictors of risk information seeking. J Risk Res. 2008;11:847–62.

Arora

Hesse

Rimer

Viswanath

Clayman

Croyle

. Frustrated and confused: the American public rates its cancer-related information-seeking experiences. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:223–8.

Hay

McCaul

Magnan

. Does worry about breast cancer predict screening behaviors? A meta-analysis of the prospective evidence. Prev Med. 2006;42:401–8.

Yang

Kahlor

. What, me worry? The role of affect in information seeking and avoidance. Sci Commun. 2012;35:189–212.

Hertwig

Pachur

Kurzenhauser

. Judgments of risk frequencies: tests of possible cognitive mechanisms. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005;31:621–42.

10.

Pachur

Hertwig

Steinmann

. How do people judge risks: availability heuristic, affect heuristic, or both? J Exp Psychol Appl. 2012;18:314–30.

11.

Emanuel

Kiviniemi

Howell

, et al. Avoiding cancer risk information. Soc Sci Med. 2015;147:113–20.

12.

Dawson

Savitsky

Dunning

. “Don’t tell me, I don’t want to know”: understanding people’s reluctance to obtain medical diagnostic information. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2006;36:751–68.

13.

Rosen

Knauper

. A little uncertainty goes a long way: state and trait differences in uncertainty interact to increase information seeking but also increase worry. Health Commun. 2009;24:228–38.

14.

Kievik

ter Huurne

EFJ

Gutteling

. The action suited to the word? Use of the framework of risk information seeking to understand risk-related behaviors. J Risk Res. 2012;15:131–47.

15.

Robert Koch-Institut. Krebs in Deutschland [Cancer in Germany]. Berlin: Robert Koch-Institut (Hrsg.) und die Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e.V. (Hrsg.); 2012.

16.

Singmann

Kellen

. An introduction to linear mixed modeling in experimental psychology. In: Spieler

Schumacher

, eds. New Methods in Neuroscience and Cognitive Psychology. New York: Routledge; 2020. p 4–31.

17.

Howell

. Statistical Methods for Psychology. 8th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning; 2012.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.58 MB