Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

There has been an explosion in the use of wearable activity trackers (WATs), but we do not fully understand who wears them and why. This study’s purpose was to describe the characteristics of WAT users and to compare current and former users.

Materials and Methods:

A variety of internet-based resources (eg, Craigslist, Facebook) were used to recruit current and former WAT users. Respondents completed a web-based survey, where they provided information on sociodemographic characteristics, health, physical activity behavior, and about their WAT use.

Results:

Of the 2826 respondents who gave informed consent, 70.8% (n = 2002) met inclusion criteria for this analysis. Respondents ranged from 18 to 81 years old (mean 32.9 ± 12.2 standard deviation) with 73.8% women. Most were current WAT users (68.7%), and the average length of WAT use overall was 9.3 ± 9.7 months. On average, current users wore the device for 3.7 months longer than former users. Compared to current users, former users had a lower body mass index (1.2 kg/m² less), reported fewer medical conditions, shared data from their device less often, and received the device as a gift more frequently.

Conclusions:

Current and former users varied in their reasons for using a WAT and how they used their device. Differences identified between these groups support further exploration of associations between WAT users’ profiles and their physical activity behavior.

Keywords

physical activity technology wearables activity trackers sociodemographics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Norris

Schiller

Clarke

. Early release of selected estimates based on data from the National Health Interview Survey. National Center for Health Statistics. June 2018.

Lee

Shiroma

Lobelo

, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–229.

Garber

Blissmer

Deschenes

, et al. American college of sports medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334–1359.

Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.

Bauman

Sallis

Dzewaltowski

Owen

. Toward a better understanding of the influences on physical activity: the role of determinants, correlates, causal variables, mediators, moderators, and confounders. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23(2 suppl):5–14.

Rhodes

Warburton

Murray

. Characteristics of physical activity guidelines and their effect on adherence: a review of randomized trials. Sports Med. 2009;39(5):355–375.

Kang

Bassett

Barreira

, et al. How many days are enough? A study of 365 days of pedometer monitoring. Res Q Exercise Sport. 2009;80(3):445–453.

Burke

Wang

Sevick

. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(1):92–102.

10.

Bravata

Smith-Spangler

Sundaram

, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298(19):2296–2304.

11.

Bassett

. Device-based monitoring in physical activity and public health research. Physiol Meas. 2012;33(11):1769–1783.

12.

Hickey

Freedson

. Utility of consumer physical activity trackers as an intervention tool in cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;58(6):613–619.

13.

Ubrani

. IDC Wearable report: Wristwear dominates the wearables market while clothing and earwear have market-beating growth by 2021. 2017. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170320005241/en/Wristwear-Dominates-Wearables-Market-Clothing-Earwear-Market-Beating.

14.

Gal

May

van Overmeeren

Simons

Monninkhof

. The effect of physical activity interventions comprising wearables and smartphone applications on physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med Open. 2018;4(1):42.

15.

Cadmus-Bertram

Marcus

Patterson

Parker

Morey

. Randomized trial of a Fitbit-based physical activity intervention for women. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(3):414–418.

16.

Jakicic

Davis

Rogers

, et al. Effect of wearable technology combined with a lifestyle intervention on long-term weight loss: The IDEA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(11):1161–1171.

17.

Ledger

McCaffrey

Inside wearables: How the science of human behavior change offers the secret to long-term engagement. Vol. 93. Cambridge, MA: Endeavour Partners LLC; 2014.

18.

Genes

Violante

Cetrangol

Rogers

Schadt

Chan

Y-FY

. From smartphone to EHR: a case report on integrating patient-generated health data. NPJ Digit Med. 2018;1:23. doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0030-8. Accessed 2018.

19.

Dinh-Le

Chuang

Chokshi

Mann

. Wearable health technology and electronic health record integration: scoping review and future directions. JMIR Mhealth UHealth. 2019;7(9):e12861.

20.

Shin

Jarrahi

Fei

, et al. Wearable activity trackers, accuracy, adoption, acceptance and health impact: a systematic literature review. J Biomed Inform. 2019;93:103153.

21.

Yank

Agarwal

Loftus

Asch

Rehkopf

. Crowdsourced health data: comparability to a US national survey, 2013-2015. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(8):1283–1289.

22.

Bondaronek

Alkhaldi

Slee

Hamilton

Murray

. Quality of publicly available physical activity apps: review and content analysis. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2018;6(3):e53.

23.

Sharon

Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philosophy Technol. 2017;30(1):93–121.

24.

United States Census Bureau: Population Division. Annual Estimates of the Resident Population: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2015: 2015 Population Estimates. 2015.

25.

Fox

Duggan

. Tracking for health: Pew research center’s internet & American life project. 2013.

26.

Godin

Shephard

. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985;10(3):141–146.

27.

Amireault

Godin

. The Godin-Shephard leisure-time physical activity questionnaire: validity evidence supporting its use for classifying healthy adults into active and insufficiently active categories. Percept Mot Ski. 2015;120(2):604–622.

28.

Zahrt

Crum

. Perceived physical activity and mortality: Evidence from three nationally representative U.S. samples. Health Psychol. 2017;36(11):1017–1025.

29.

Benjamini

Hochberg

. Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B Met. 1995;57(1):289–300.

30.

Patel

Asch

Volpp

. Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA. 2015;313(5):459–460.

31.

Gartner

. Gartner survey shows wearable devices need to be more useful. Gartner Press Release. 2016.

32.

Strecher

Seijts

Kok

, et al. Goal setting as a strategy for health behavior change. Health Edu Quarterly. 1995;22(2):190–200.

33.

Nahum-Shani

Smith

Spring

, et al. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Ann Behav Med. 2017;52(6):446–462.

34.

Christakis

Fowler

. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(4):370–379.

35.

Wing

Jeffery

. Benefits of recruiting participants with friends and increasing social support for weight loss and maintenance. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67(1):132–138.

36.

Chang

RC-S

H-P

Yang

Luarn

. Reciprocal reinforcement between wearable activity trackers and social network services in influencing physical activity behaviors. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2016;4(3):e84.

37.

Swartz

Lewis

Swartz

Martinez

Lyons

. Brief report: active ingredients for adherence to a tracker-based physical activity intervention in older adults. J Appl Gerontol. 2019;38(7):1023–1034.

38.

Asch

Muller

Volpp

. Automated hovering in health care–watching over the 5000 hours. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(1):1–3.

39.

Pevnick

Fuller

Duncan

Spiegel

. A large-scale initiative inviting patients to share personal fitness tracker data with their providers: Initial results. PloS One. 2016;11(11):e0165908.

40.

Maher

Ryan

Ambrosi

Edney

. Users’ experiences of wearable activity trackers: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):880.

41.

Motl

McAuley

DiStefano

. Is social desirability associated with self-reported physical activity? Prev Med. 2005;40(6):735–739.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

0.22 MB

0.05 MB

Who Uses Wearable Activity Trackers and Why? A Comparison of Former and Current Users in the United States

Abstract

Background:

Materials and Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material