Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Incentives and sanctions, and more recently therapeutic adjustments, are used in problem-solving courts (PSCs) to promote behavioral change for participants. However, little is known about how PSC team members perceive the use of these strategies. Drawing upon 20 semi-structured interviews with drug court, mental health court, and veterans’ court personnel within a midwestern jurisdiction, we explored perceptions of incentives, sanctions, and therapeutic adjustments. Nearly all personnel reported a need to increase frequency and types of incentives offered. In addition, some PSC personnel described nonjudicial team members imposing informal consequences without the judge present. Furthermore, confusion was noted between the terms “sanction” and “therapeutic adjustment.” Understanding the distinction between sanctions and therapeutic adjustments is critical for PSC program evaluation, yet greater dissemination of existing guidelines is needed. Oversight by statewide administrative entities could help ensure consistent understanding and application of PSC best practices.

Keywords

problem-solving courts incentives sanctions therapeutic adjustments

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

All Rise. (2024a). Adult treatment court best practice standards (2nd ed.). https://allrise.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Adult-Treatment-Court-Best-Practice-Standards-I-VI_VIII_X-final.pdf

All Rise. (2024b). Reference guide for Standard IV: Incentives, sanctions, and service adjustments. https://allrise.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ISSA-Reference-Guide-2024.pdf

Bull

(n.d.). Low-cost/no-cost incentives: A guide for motivating change on a budget. https://www.wicourts.gov/courts/programs//problemsolving/docs/judgebullincentives.pdf

Bullard

C. E.

Thrasher

(2016). Evaluating mental health court by impact on jurisdictional crime rates. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 27(3), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403414562420

Burdon

W. M.

Roll

J. M.

Prendergast

M. L.

Rawson

R. A.

(2001). Drug courts and contingency management. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 73–90. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/002204260103100105

Callahan

Steadman

H. J.

Tillman

Vesselinov

(2013). A multi-site study of the use of sanctions and incentives in mental health courts. Law & Human Behavior, 37(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093989

Campbell

J. L.

Quincy

Osserman

Pedersen

O. K.

(2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320.

Campbell

M. A.

Canales

D. D.

Wei

Totten

A. E.

Macaulay

W. A. C.

Wershler

J. L.

(2015). Multidimensional evaluation of a mental health court: Adherence to the risk-need-responsivity model. Law and Human Behavior, 39(5), 489–502. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/lhb0000135

Canada

K. E.

Trawver

K. R.

Barrenger

(2020). Deciding to participate in mental health court: Exploring participant perspectives. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 72, 101628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101628

10.

Carey

S. M.

Mackin

J. R.

Finigan

M. W.

(2012). What works? The ten key components of drug court: Research-based best practices. Drug Court Review, 8(1), 6–42. https://npcresearch.com/publication/what-works-the-ten-key-components-of-drug-court-research-based-best-practices-3/

11.

Center for Court Innovation. (2011). Statewide coordination of problem-solving courts: A snapshot of five states. https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/statewide-coordination-problem-solving-courts-snapshot-five-states

12.

Center for Court Innovation. (2013). Developing a statewide drug court data tracking system: The why, what, and how of it. https://www.innovatingjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/CCI_DrugCourt_Factsheet_3172022.pdf

13.

DeVall

Lanier

Baker

L. J.

(2022). Painting the current picture: A national report on treatment courts in the United States. National Drug Court Research Center.

14.

Emerson

R. M.

Fretz

R. I.

Shaw

L. L.

(2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.

15.

Erickson

S. K.

Campbell

Lamberti

J. S.

(2006). Variations in mental health courts: Challenges, opportunities, and a call for caution. Community Mental Health Journal, 42(4), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-006-9046-7

16.

Fusch

P. I.

Ness

L. R.

(2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281

17.

Gallagher

J. R.

Nordberg

Francis

Menon

Canada

Minasian

R. M.

(2021). A focus group analysis with a drug court team: Opioid use disorders and the role of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) in programming. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 21(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533256X.2021.1912964

18.

Gallagher

J. R.

Nordberg

Szymanowski

Malone

S. E.

(2019). A behind-the-scenes perspective on the key components of drug court: A narrative analysis. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 29(7), 909–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1635550

19.

Gibbs

B. R.

Ten Bensel

Doyle

M. K.

Wakefield

(2021). The drug court team and discretionary decision-making: A mixed-methods examination of sanctioning responses to continued participant alcohol and other drug use. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403420904127

20.

Guastaferro

Daigle

L. E.

(2012). Linking noncompliant behaviors and programmatic responses: The use of graduated sanctions in felony-level drug court. Journal of Drug Issues, 42(4), 396–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042612461773

21.

Han

(2019). Life changes matter more than satisfaction or sanctions/incentives: An examination of mental health court experience factors associated with arrest. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 18(4), 376–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2019.1588434

22.

Han

Matejkowski

Lee

(2020). Racial variation in mental health court experiences and the associations of these experiences with recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(7), 808–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820921886

23.

Hartley

R. D.

Baldwin

J. M.

(2019). Waging war on recidivism among justice-involved veterans: An impact evaluation of a large urban veterans treatment court. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(1), 52–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403416650490

24.

Hughes

Reichert

(2017). An overview of problem-solving courts and implications for practice. Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. https://icjia.illinois.gov/researchhub/articles/an-overview-of-problem-solving-courts-and-implications-for-practice

25.

Jalain

C. I.

Lucas

P. A.

Higgins

G. E.

(2024). Assessing the effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing recidivism: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Justice Evaluation Journal, 7(2), 212–230.

26.

Johnson

R. S.

Stolar

A. G.

McGuire

J. F.

Clark

Coonan

L. A.

Hausknecht

Graham

D. P.

(2016). US veterans’ court programs: An inventory and analysis of national survey data. Community Mental Health Journal, 52, 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-015-9972-3

27.

Kaiser

K. A.

Rhodes

(2019). A drug court by any other name? An analysis of problem-solving court programs. Law and Human Behavior, 43(3), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000325

28.

Knudsen

Wingenfeld

(2016). A specialized treatment court for veterans with trauma exposure: Implications for the field. Community Mental Health Journal, 52(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-015-9845-9

29.

Lindquist

C. H.

Krebs

C. P.

Lattimore

P. K.

(2006). Sanctions and rewards in drug court programs: Implementation, perceived efficacy, and decision making. Journal of Drug Issues, 36(1), 119–146.

30.

Marlowe

D. B.

(2007). Strategies for administering rewards and sanctions. In Lessenger

J. E.

Roperd

G. F.

(Eds.), Drug courts: A new approach to treatment and rehabilitation (pp. 317–336). Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-0-387-71433-2.pdf

31.

Marlowe

D. B.

(2011). Applying incentives and sanctions. In Marlowe

D. B.

Meyer

W. B.

(Eds.), The drug court judicial benchbook (pp. 139–157). National Drug Court Institute. http://www.ndci.org/sites/default/files/nadcp/14146_NDCI_Benchbook_v6.pdf

32.

Marlowe

D. B.

(2012). Behavior modification 101 for drug courts: Making the most of incentives and sanctions. National Drug Court Institute. https://allrise.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Incentives-and-Sanctions.pdf

33.

Marlowe

D. B.

(2022). Drug courts: The good, the bad, and the misunderstood. In Jeglic

Calkins

(Eds.), Handbook of issues in criminal justice reform in the United States (pp. 637–658). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77565-0_32

34.

McNiel

D. E.

Binder

R. L.

(2010). Stakeholder views of a mental health court. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(4), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.004

35.

National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2012). List of incentives and sanctions.

36.

National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2018). Adult drug court best practice standards: Volume II (text rev.). https://allrise.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Adult-Drug-Court-Best-Practice-Standards-Volume-2_Standard-VII_Text-Revision-December-2018-1.pdf

37.

National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2024). Drug overdose death rates. https://nida.nih.gov/research-topics/trends-statistics/overdose-death-rates

38.

Nolan

J. L.

(2001). Reinventing justice: The American drug court movement. Princeton University Press.

39.

Shannon

L. M.

Birdwhistell

Hulbig

S. K.

Jones

A. J.

Newell

Payne

(2017). Examining implementation and preliminary performance indicators of veterans treatment courts: The Kentucky experience. Evaluation and Program Planning, 63, 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.03.003

40.

Staton

M. D.

Lurigio

A. J.

(2015). Mental health courts in Illinois: Comparing and contrasting program models, sanction applications, information sharing and professional roles. Federal Probation, 79(1), 21–26.

41.

Steadman

H. J.

Redlich

A. D.

(2006). An evaluation of the Bureau of Justice Assistance Mental Health Court Initiative. Bureau of Justice Assistance.

42.

Thompson

Osher

Tomasini-Joshi

(2007). Improving responses to people with mental illnesses: The essential elements of a mental health court. Council of State Governments Justice Center, Bureau of Justice Assistance. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/improving-responses-people-mental-illnesses-essential-elements-0

43.

Watts

Weinrath

(2017). Manitoba’s mental health court: A consumer perspective. Manitoba Law Journal, 40(3), 225–246.

44.

Wilson

D. B.

Mitchell

MacKenzie

D. L.

(2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-006-9019-4

45.

Wodahl

E. J.

Garland

Culhane

S. E.

McCarty

W. P.

(2011). Utilizing behavioral interventions to improve supervision outcomes in community-based corrections. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(4), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810397866

46.

Wodahl

E. J.

Schweitzer

Heck

(2024). Carrot or stick? The efficacy of incentives and sanctions for improving probation supervision outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 51(12), 1820–1837. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241275626

Problem-Solving Court Personnel Perspectives of Incentives,Sanctions,and Therapeutic Adjustments

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References