To better understand the struggles drug court participants face and their relationship to graduation status, we took freehand notes during observations of staff meetings (N = 119) and court dockets (N = 147) and used thematic analysis to examine the notations. Themes included participants’ ongoing mental and physical health issues, legal issues outside of drug court, experience with both prosocial and antisocial relationships, drug use by family and friends, and a variety of treatment barriers even in a program designed to mitigate these. We expected ongoing legal issues outside of drug court, physical and mental health struggles, and family and friends being supportive, or not, to be related to graduation but they were not. However, COVID-19 and treatment barriers were significantly related to graduation status. Results add to the scholarly literature, especially that focusing on justice and court processes post-COVID-19, and can assist practitioners in understanding what factors may need more attention and resources.
AhlinE. M.DoudsA. S. (2019). The problem with problem-solving courts: The black box remains unopened after thirty years. In SpohnC.BrennanP. (Eds.), Handbook on sentencing policies and practices in the 21st century (pp. 339–359). Routledge.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.HogeR. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001004
4.
BaldwinJ. M. (2013). Veterans treatment courts: Studying dissemination, implementation, and impact of treatment-oriented criminal courts [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Florida.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association.
6.
CareyS. M.MackinJ. R.FiniganM. W. (2012). What works? The ten key components of drug court: Research-based best practices. Drug Court Review, 8(1), 6–42.
7.
CastleberryA.NolenA. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds?Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
Defining drug courts: The key components. (2004). The National Association of Drug Court Professionals, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
GoldkampJ. S.WhiteM. D.RobinsonJ. B. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 27–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260103100104
13.
HartsellE.LaneJ. (2022). Initial lessons learned during a remote drug court evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Crime and Justice, 45(5), 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2022.2047100
14.
HartsellE.LaneJ.ValianiS. (2023). Life events and other stressors of diversion drug court participants: An exploratory analysis of race and gender differences. Drug Court Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2022.2047100
15.
HillerM.BelenkoS.TaxmanF.YoungD.PerdoniM.SaumC. (2010). Measuring drug court structure and operations: Key components and beyond. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(9), 933–950. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810373727
16.
LeukefeldC.WebsterJ. M.Staton-TindallM.DuvallJ. (2007). Employment and work among drug court clients: 12-month outcomes. Substance Use & Misuse, 42(7), 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080701409701
17.
LucenkoB.BlackC.ShahM. F.FelverB. E. M.HuberA. (2014). Washington court and recovery enhancement system—Program, participants, services and preliminary findings (Report number 4.90). DSHS Research and Data Analysis.
18.
MitchellO.WilsonD. B.EggersA.MacKenzieD. L. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.11.009
19.
MorseD. S.SilversteinJ.ThomasK.BedelP.CerulliC. (2015). Finding the loopholes: A cross-sectional qualitative study of systemic barriers to treatment access for women drug court participants. Health & Justice, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-015-0026-2
National Treatment Court Resource Center. (2023). https://ntcrc.org/
22.
PalombiL.HawthorneA. N.IrishA.BecherE.BowenE. (2019a). “One out of ten ain’t going to make it”: An analysis of recovery capital in the rural upper midwest. Journal of Drug Issues, 49(4), 680–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042619859309
23.
PalombiL. C.TomaszewskiR.O’DonnellC.McAuliffe StaehlerT. M.JohnsonP.KosobuskiL.BaldwinS. J.StrattonT. P. (2019b). In their own words: Supports and barriers to recovery for participants in two neighboring drug courts. Drug Court Review, Winter, 2019, 50–76.
24.
QuirouetteM.Hannah-MoffatK.MauruttoP. (2016). ‘A precarious place’: Housing and clients of specialized courts. British Journal of Criminology, 56(2), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv050
25.
RossmanS. B.ZweigJ. M.KralsteinD.HenryK.DowneyP. M.LindquistC. H. (2011). The multi-site adult drug court evaluation: The drug court experience. Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
26.
SalvatoreC.HillerM. L.SamuelsonB.HendersonJ. S.WhiteE. (2011). A systematic observational study of a juvenile drug court judge. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 62(4), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.2011.01066.x
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2021). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. PEP21-07-01-003, NSDUH Series H-56). Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Van CleveN. G. (2016). Crook county: Racism and injustice in America’s largest criminal court. Stanford University Press.
31.
WeisburdD.BrittC. (2014). Statistics in criminal justice (4th ed.). Springer publication.
32.
WilsonD. B.MitchellO.MacKenzieD. L. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-006-9019-4
