Research in supply chain management focused on the buyer-supplier relationship (BSR) indicates that costing practices can impact relationship quality and performance. Yet, few studies have examined how the supplier’s costing methods affect the BSR. To address this gap, this study investigates the role of open costing in the BSR within the apparel supply chain. Open costing is a popular costing practice in which a supplier compiles an itemized list of costs rather than a fixed price. To examine the extent to which open costing is practiced as part of BSRs, interviews were conducted with 30 professionals operating as suppliers in China and Bangladesh. A thematic analysis of the interview data identified several factors important to open costing and the BSR, including Mutual Trust, Fairness, Flexibility, Efficiency, and Sustainability. Findings shed light on the mechanism and practice of open costing within the BSR, and specifically from the perspective of suppliers.
AdamsF.RicheyR.JrAutryC.MorganT.GablerC. (2014). Supply chain collaboration, integration, and relational technology: How complex operant resources increase performance outcomes. Journal of Business Logistics, 35, 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12074
2.
BlauP. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.
3.
BritoR.MiguelP. (2017). Power, governance, and value in collaboration: Differences between buyer and supplier perspectives. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(2), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12134
4.
BruceM.DalyL.TowersN. (2004). Lean or agile: A solution for supply chain management in the textiles and clothing industry?International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410514867
ChaudhryH.HodgeG. (2012). Postponement and supply chain structure: Cases from the textile and apparel industry. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021211203032
7.
ChoJ.ChungJ.HwangJ. (2015). Effects of satisfaction and trust on long-term orientation in small apparel retailer–supplier relationships. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 33(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0887302X14563160
8.
CookK.RiceE. (2005). Social exchange theory. In RitzerG. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social theory (Vol. 1, pp. 736–740). Sage.
9.
de Almeida FehrL. C. F.RochaW. (2018). Open-book accounting and trust: Influence on buyer-supplier relationship. RAUSP Management Journal, 53(4), 597–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-06-2018-0034
ElfenbeinD.ZengerT. (2014). What is a relationship worth? Repeated exchange and the development and deployment of relational capital. Organization Science, 25(1), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0824
FawcettS. E.FawcettA. M.WatsonB. J.MagnanG. M. (2012). Peeking inside the black box: Toward an understanding of supply chain collaboration dynamics. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(1), 44–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03241.x
HergethH. (2002). Target costing in the textile complex. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 2(1V), 1–10.
16.
HodgesN. (2011). Qualitative research: A discussion of frequently articulated qualms (FAQs). Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 40(1), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-3934.2011.02091.x
17.
HomansG. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
18.
HughesA. (2005). ABC/ABM—activity-based costing and activity-based management: A profitability model for SMEs manufacturing clothing and textiles in the UK. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 9(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020510586370
19.
HuoB.FlynnB. B.ZhaoX. (2017). Supply chain power configurations and their relationship with performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(2), 88–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12139
20.
KannanV. R.TanK. C. (2002). Supplier selection and assessment: Their impact on business performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(3), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00139.x
21.
KingshottR. P. (2006). The impact of psychological contracts upon trust and commitment within supplier–buyer relationships: A social exchange view. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(6), 724–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.06.006
22.
KvaleS. (1996). Inter-views. Sage.
23.
LambeC.WittmannC.SpekmanR. (2001). Social exchange theory and research on business-to-business relational exchange. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 8(3), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1300/J033v08n03_01
24.
MasonJ. (1996). Qualitative researching. Sage.
25.
MasscheleinS.CardinaelsE.AbbeeleA. (2012). ABC information, fairness perceptions, and interfirm negotiations. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 951–973. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10214
26.
MerriamS. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
NorekC.PohlenT. (2001). Cost knowledge: A foundation for improving supply chain relationships. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 12(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090110806217
29.
SarkisJ.HelmsM. M.HervaniA. A. (2010). Reverse logistics and social sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(6), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.220
30.
ShimE.SuditE. (1995). How manufacturers price products. Management Accounting, 76(8), 37.
31.
SinghK.HodgesN. (2011). Buyer-supplier partnerships in the global apparel industry: A study of US buyers and Indian suppliers. Fashion Practice, 3(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.2752/175693811X13080607764737
32.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (Vol. 2). Sage.
WhippleJ. M.LynchD. F.NyagaG. N. (2010). A buyer’s perspective on collaborative versus transactional relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(3), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.11.008
