Discipline,Erasure,and Silenced Subjectivities: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Florida's 2022 Parental Rights in Education Act

Abstract

This critical policy analysis is concerned with the discursive linguistic practices and social justice implications surrounding the passage of Florida's controversial “Parental Rights in Education Act” (PREA), which enacts limitations on classroom instruction involving topics related to gender and sexuality. Foregrounding this essay lays a call for social work scholarship to recognize the significance of the critical semiotic and post-structural turn in social science research, which evinces the importance of attending to the nuanced relationship between discourse, power, ideology, and identity formation. As a field espousing the tenets of social justice and commitments to the broader aims of social equality, social work holds an inherent investment in understanding the politics of language and, by extension, the language of emancipatory change. Informed by critical discourse analysis (CDA) and feminist post-structural thought, this analysis brings to the forefront the relevance of discourse, language, and semiotics as crucial objects of inquiry and seeks to examine what norms are in operation in the context of this legislation. What can discourse reveal about the nature of the social problem as postulated by PREA, and what discursive implications might it contain? Ultimately, this analysis contends that PREA represents a new threshold of educational and queer surveillance, best understood when bracketed by the ideologies of neoliberalism, cis-/heteropatriarchy, and the concomitant articulation of transphobia.

Keywords

critical discourse analysis disciplinary power queer surveillance critical policy analysis anti-LGBTQ+ legislation Parental Rights in Education Act

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bacchi

C. L.

(1999). Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. Sage.

Ball

S. J.

(1990). Politics and policy making in education: Explorations in policy sociology. Rutledge.

Baxter

(2003). Positioning gender in discourse: A feminist methodology. Palgrave Macmillan.

Baxter

(2015). Feminist poststructural discourse analysis. In The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1–6). Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi020

Berg-Brousseau

(2022, March 24). ICYMI: As lawmakers escalate attacks on transgender youth across the county, some GOP leaders stand up for transgender youth . Human Right Watch (press release). https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/icymi-as-lawmakers-escalate-attacks-on-transgender-youth-across-the-country-some-gop-leaders-stand-up-for-transgender-youth

Bickford

Matijczak

Kemmerer

Martinez

Wagaman

M. A.

(2023). Applications of transformative justice principles for centering transgender and gender expansive experiences in social work education and practice. The Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 50(1), 181–207. https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.4694

Bourdieu

(2001). Language and symbolic power (6th ed.). Harvard University Press.

Bronski

(2012). A queer history of the United States. Beacon Press.

Butler

(1990/2007). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

10.

Cohen

(1997). Punks, bulldaggers, and welfare queens: The radical potential of queer politics? GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 3(4), 437–465. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-3-4-437

11.

Fairclough

(1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

12.

Fairclough

(2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121–138). Sage Publications.

13.

Fairclough

(2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.798239

14.

Fairclough

Wodak

(1997). Critical discourse analysis. In Van Dijk

T. A.

(Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 258–284). Sage.

15.

Federal Bureau of Investigations. (2019). 2019 Hate Crime Statistics . FBI: UCR. https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2019/topic-pages/incidents-and-offenses

16.

Florida Governor’s Office. (2022, March 28). Governor Ron DeSantis signs historic bill to protect parental rights in education [Press release]. https://flgov.com/2022/03/28/governor-ron-desantis-signs-historic-bill-to-protect-parental-rights-in-education/

17.

Florida State Legislature. (2022, March 28). Parental rights in education: Summary analysis. (Bill summary). https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?FileName=h1557z.EEC.DOCX&DocumentType=Analysis&BillNumber=1557&Session=2022

18.

Foucault

(1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Random House.

19.

Foucault

(1997). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. Random House.

20.

Friedman

Tager

(2022). Educational gag orders: Legislative restrictions on the freedom to read learn and write. PEN America. https://pen.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/PEN_EducationalGagOrders_01-18-22-compressed.pdf

21.

Gallup. (2022). LGBT rights. Accessed November 27, 2022, from https://news.gallup.com/poll/1651/Gay-Lesbian-Rights.aspx

22.

Giroux

(2005). The terror of neoliberalism: Rethinking the significance of cultural politics. College Literature, 32(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2005.0006

23.

GLAAD. (2022, November 17). Donald Trump: GLADD accountability project. https://www.glaad.org/gap/donald-trump

24.

GLSEN. (2023, March 17). GLSEN responds to DeSantis signing four anti-LGBTQ+ bills into law. https://www.glsen.org/news/glsen-responds-desantis-signing-four-anti-lgbtq-bills-law

25.

Halliday

Matthiessen

(2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.

26.

Hatchel

Polanin

J. R.

Espelage

D. L.

(2021). Suicidal thoughts and behaviors among LGBTQ youth: Meta-analyses and a systematic review. Archives of Suicide Research, 25(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2019.1663329

27.

Humans Right Campaign. (2023, February 15). Human rights campaign working to defeat 340 anti-LGBTQ+ bills at state level already, 150 of which target transgender people—highest number on record [Press Release]. https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/human-rights-campaign-working-to-defeat-340-anti-lgbtq-bills-at-state-level-already-150-of-which-target-transgender-people-highest-number-on-record

28.

Jørgensen

Phillips

L. J.

(2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. Sage.

29.

Kafer

Grinberg

(2019). Queer surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 17(5), 592–601. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i5.13541

30.

Karlberg

(2005). The power of discourse and the discourse of power: Pursing peace through discourse intervention. International Journal of Peace Studies, 10(1), 1–25. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41852070

31.

Katz

J. N.

(1996). The invention of heterosexuality. Plume.

32.

Kline

N. S.

Griner

S. B.

Neelamegam

Webb

N. J.

Morales

J. J.

Rhodes

S. D.

(2022). Responding to “Don't Say Gay” laws in the US: Research priorities and considerations for health equity. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: Journal of NSRC, 19(4), 1397–1402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-022-00773-0

33.

Lemke

(1995). Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. Taylor & Francis.

34.

Leotti

S. M.

Sugrue

E. P.

Winges-Yanez

(2022). Unpacking the worlds in our words: Critical discourse analysis and social work inquiry. Qualitative Social Work, 21(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325021990860

35.

Michaud

Mathers

Tin

L.-G.

Redburn

(2008). The dictionary of homophobia: A global history of gay & lesbian experience. Arsenal Pulp Press.

36.

NPR. (2022, April 5). What Florida's parental rights in education law means for teachers. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2022/04/04/1090946670/what-floridas-parental-rightsin-education-law-means-for-teachers

37.

O’Connor

M. K.

Netting

F. E.

(2011). Analyzing social policy: Multiple perspectives for critically understanding and evaluating policy. Wiley & Sons.

38.

Parental Rights in Education Act. (2022). H.B.1557, Florida. https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2022/1557/BillText/er/PDF

39.

Pushaw

[@ChristinaPushaw]. (2022, March 4). The bill that liberals inaccurately call “Don’t Say Gay” would be more accurately described as an Anti-Grooming Bill . Twitter. https://twitter.com/ChristinaPushaw/status/1499886619259777029?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%22%3EMarch

40.

Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network. (2020, July 10). Grooming: Know the warning signs . https://www.rainn.org/news/grooming-know-warning-signs

41.

Reyes

(2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse and Society, 22(6), 781–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927

42.

Roscoe

K. D.

(2019). Critical discourse analysis and social work. In Webb

(Ed.), The Routledge handbook of critical social work. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351264402-18

43.

Shaull

(2005). Forward. In Paulo Freire’s pedagogy of the oppressed (pp. 29–34). Continuum.

44.

Soss

Fording

R. C.

Schram

S. F.

(2012). The rise of neoliberal paternalism. In Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race (pp. 18–52). University of Chicago Press.

45.

Stone

(2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. Norton & Company.

46.

The Heritage Foundation. (2022). Florida’s parental rights education bill hits target: Gender ideology harms kids. (Published on February 14th, 2022). https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/floridas-parental-rights-education-bill-hits-target-gender-ideology-harms-kids

47.

The Trevor Project. (2021). 2021 national survey on LGBTQ youth mental health. West Hollywood, California: The Trevor Project. https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2021/?section=ResearchMethodology

48.

The Trevor Project. (2023). Mental health of black transgender and nonbinary young people. The Trevor Project. https://www.thetrevorproject.org/research-briefs/mental-health-of-black-transgender-and-nonbinary-young-people-feb-2023/

49.

Van Dijk

T. A.

(1995). Aims of critical discourse analysis. Japanese Discourse, 1(1), 17–27.

50.

Van Dijk

T. A.

(2006). Politics, ideology, and discourse. In Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 728–740). https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00722-7

51.

Weedon

(1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Blackwell.

52.

Wiggins

(2022). His record: Florida Senator Baxley is a notorious anti-LGBTQ+ lawmaker. Advocate . https://www.advocate.com/politics/2022/3/10/florida-senator-dennis-baxley-anti-lgbtq-record-history-bill-law-dont-say-gay#media-gallery-media-1

53.

Willey-Sthapit

Jen

Storer

H. L.

Benson

O. G.

(2022). Discursive decisions: Signposts to guide the use of critical discourse analysis in social work. Qualitative Social Work, 21(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325020979050

54.

Wodak

Meyer

(2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis (1st ed.). Sage.

55.

Young

C. J.

Friedman

(PEN American). (2022, August 17th). America’s censored classroom: Key findings. https://pen.org/report/Americas-censored-classrooms/

56.

Zelnick

J. R.

Kim

M. E.

Goodkind

(2023). First they came for critical race theory…. Affilia, 38(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099231163651