In this article, the authors reflect on their collective engagements with community-based participatory action research (PAR) as part of a university—community partnership. The authors discuss both the transformative potential of PAR and the tensions that they struggle with in their praxis. The analysis raises questions of representation, accountability, and inclusion that are central to feminist and antiracist theory, critical pedagogy, community-based research, and social justice work. First, the authors discuss PAR by locating their position within this critical perspective. Second, the authors focus on research that the authors conducted with young people participating in the Mestizo Arts and Activism Collective of Salt Lake City, Utah. The authors identify key contributions of a liberatory PAR that may be of particular relevance to researchers who are working toward social change. To conclude, the authors identify the tensions and challenges in doing this work as a feminist praxis of ‘‘critical hope,’’ ‘‘where what could be is sought; where what has been, is critiqued; and where what is, is troubled.’’
Albrecht, L. D., & Brewer, R. M. (Eds.). (1990). Bridges of power: Women’s multicultural alliances. Philadelphia, PA: New Society.
2.
Alemán, E., Jr. , Delgado Bernal, D., & Buendía , S.V. (2010). (Mis)educating Latina/o and Chicana/o youth: LatCrit praxis as reciprocal partnership. Unpublished manuscript, Utah Education Policy Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
3.
Alemán, E., Jr. , & Rorrer, A.K. (2006). Closing educational gaps for Latino/a students in Utah: Initiating a policy discourse and framework . SaltLake City: Utah Education Policy Center.
4.
Apple, M. ( 1993). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
Bell, D. ( 1995). David Baum Memorial lecture: Who’s afraid of critical race theory? University of Illinois Law Review, 4, 893-910.
6.
Bell, E.E. ( 2001). Infusing race in the US discourse on action research . In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 48-58). London, England: SAGE.
7.
Cahill, C. ( 2007a). Including excluded perspectives in participatory action research. Design Studies, 28, 325-340.
8.
Cahill, C. ( 2007b). Repositioning ethical commitments: Participatory action research as a relational praxis of social change. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6, 360-373.
9.
Cahill, C. ( 2010). ‘‘Why do they hate us?’’ Reframing immigration through participatory action research. Area, 42, 152-161.
10.
Cahill, C., Bradley, M., Castañeda, D., Esquivel, L., Mohamed, N., Organista, J., . . . Winston, K. ( 2008). ‘‘Represent’’: Reframing risk through participatory video research. In M. Downing & L. Tenney (Eds.), Video vision: Changing the culture of social science research (pp. 207-228). Newcastle, England: Cambridge Scholars.
11.
Cahill, C., & Torre, M.E. ( 2007). Beyond the journal article: Representations, audience, and the presentation of participatory action research. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place (pp. 196-205). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
Chavez, V., & Soep, E. ( 2005). Youth radio and the pedagogy of collegiality. Harvard Educational Review, 75, 1-23.
13.
Collier, M. J. (Ed.). (2003). Intercultural alliances: Critical transformation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
Cook, I., et al. (2008). Writing collaboration. Retrieved from http://writingcollaboration.wordpress.com/1-outline
15.
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny?London, England: Zed Books.
16.
Delgado Bernal, D., & Villalpando, O. (2002). An apartheid of knowledge in the academy: The struggle over ‘‘legitimate’’ knowledge for faculty of color. Equity and Excellence in Education, 35, 169-180.
17.
Duncan-Andrade, J.M.R. ( 2009). Note to educators: Hope required when growing roses in concrete. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 181-194.
18.
Eaker-Rich, D., & Van Galen, J. (Eds.). (1996). Caring in an unjust world: Negotiating borders and barriers in schools. Albany : State University of New York Press.
19.
Ellis, C. ( 2007). Telling secrets, revealing lies: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 3-29.
20.
Fals Borda, O. ( 1979). Investigating the reality in order to transform it: The Coloumbian experience. Dialectical Anthropology, 4, 33-55.
21.
Fine, M., & Barreras, R. ( 2001). Point and counterpoint: To be of use. ASAP, 1. Retrieved from http://www.asap-spssi.org/issue2.htm
22.
Fine, M., Tuck, E., & Zeller-Berkman, S. (2007). Do you believe in Geneva? Methods and ethics and the global/ local nexus. In C. McCarthy, A. Durham, L. Engel, A. Filmer, M. Giardina, & M. Malagreca (Eds.), Globalizing cultural studies: Ethnographic interventions in theory, method, and policy (pp. 493-526). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
23.
Foucault, M. ( 1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (Colin Gordon, Ed. & Trans.). New York, NY : Pantheon Books.
24.
Freire, P. ( 1997). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth , England: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1970).
25.
Gilligan, C. ( 1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Ginwright, S., & James, T. ( 2002). From assets to agents of change: Social justice, organizing, and youth development. New Directions for Youth Development , 96, 27-46.
27.
Ginwright, S., Noguera, P. , & Cammarota, J. (Eds.). (2006). Beyond resistance: Youth activism and community change: New democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America’s youth. New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
Giroux, H.A. ( 1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York, NY: Routledge .
29.
Guishard, M. ( 2009). ‘‘The false paths, the endless labors, the turns now this way and now that’’: Participatory action research, mutual vulnerability, and the politics of inquiry. Urban Review: Issues and Ideas in Public Education, 41, 85-105.
30.
Hernández-Ávila, I. (2002). In the presence of spirits: A meditation on the politics of solidarity and transformation. In G. E. Anzaldua & A. L. Keating (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 530-538). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
Hill-Collins, P. ( 2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
Holloway, S., & Valentine, G. ( 2000). Children’s geographies: Playing, living, learning . New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
Hughes, L. ( 2004). Let America be America again and other poems. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
34.
Jordan, S. ( 2009). From a methodology of the margins to neoliberal appropriation and beyond: The lineages of PAR. In D. Kapoor & S. Jordan (Eds.), Education, participatory action research and social change: International perspectives (pp. 5-27). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
Kelley, R.D.G. ( 1998). Check the technique: Black urban culture and the predicament of social science. In N. B. Dirk (Ed.), Near ruins: Cultural theory at the end of the century (pp. 39-66). Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
36.
Kesby, M. ( 2005). Re-theorizing empowerment-through-participation as a performance in space: Beyond tyranny to transformation. Signs , 30, 2037-2065.
37.
Kothari, U. ( 2001). Power, knowledge and social control in participatory development. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation the new tyranny? (pp. 139-152). London, England: Zed Books.
38.
Lykes, M.B. ( 2001). Activist participatory research and the arts with rural Mayan women: Interculturality and situated meaning making. In D. L. Tolman & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), From subjects to subjectivities: A handbook of interpretative and participatory methods (pp. 183-199). New York: NYU Press.
39.
Mohan, G. ( 2001). Beyond participation: Strategies for deeper empowerment . In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation the new tyranny? (pp. 153-167). London, England: Zed Books.
40.
Mohanty, C.T. ( 2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
41.
mrs. c. kinpaisby-hill. (2008). Publishing from participatory research. In A. Blunt (Ed.), Publishing in geography: A guide for new researchers (pp. 45-47). London, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
42.
mrs. c. kinpaisby-hill. (IN PRESS). Participatory praxis and social justice: Towards more fully social geographies. In V. Del Casino, Jr.,M. Thomas, R. Panelli, & P. Cloke (Eds.), A companion to social geography. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell .
43.
Pain, R. ( 2004). Social geography: Participatory research. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 1-12.
44.
Perlich, P. ( 2006). Long-term demographic trends impacting higher education . Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah, Bureau of Economic and Business Research.
45.
Quijada, D.A. ( 2008). Reconciling research, rallies and citizenship: Reflections on youth led diversity work-shops and intercultural alliances. Social Justice, 35, 76-90.
46.
Rahman, A. ( 2007). Some trends in the praxis of participatory action research . In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research (pp. 49-62). London, England: SAGE.
47.
Skelton, T. ( 2007). Children, young people, UNICEF and participation. Children’s Geographies, 5, 165-181.
48.
Smith, D. ( 1987). The everyday world as problematic. Athens, GA: Northeastern University Press.
49.
Smith, L.T. ( 1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples . New York, NY: Zed Books.
50.
Smith, W.A. ( 2004). Black faculty coping with racial battle fatigue: The campus racial climate in a post-civil rights era. In D. Cleveland (Ed.), Broken silence: Conversations about race by African Americans at predominately white institutions (pp. 171-190). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
51.
Torre, M.E., (2009). Participatory action research and critical race theory: Fueling spaces for nos-otras to research. Urban Review , 41, 106-120.
Torre, M.E., & Fine, M. ( 2006). Participatory action research (PAR) by youth. In L. Sherrod (Ed.), Youth activism: An international encyclopedia (pp. 456-462). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
54.
Torre, M.E., Fine, M., Boudin, K., Bowen, I., Clark, J., Hylton, D., . . . Upegui, D. ( 2001). A space for co-constructing counter stories under surveillance . International Journal of Critical Psychology, 4, 149-166.
55.
Valenzuela, A. ( 1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
56.
West, C. ( 2004). The impossible will take a little while. In P. Rogat (Ed.), The impossible will take a little while: A citizen’s guide to hope in a time of fear (pp. 293-297). New York, NY: Basic Books.
57.
West, C. ( 2008). Hope on a tightrope. New York, NY : Smiley Books.
58.
Yosso, T. ( 2000). A critical race and LatCrit approach to media literacy: Chicana/o resistance to visual microagressions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angles, CA, USA.
