This review catalogs approaches to involving children in local agency land use planning processes. Four approaches are defined: scholarly, practice, educational, and rights-based. There is only a weak link between any of these approaches and actual local agency land use planning. However, the rightsbased approach is the most holistic of the four. Examining these approaches raised questions. These questions are discussed and lead into the formulation of a new approach that synthesizes components from all of the studied approaches.
American Planning Association. 2002. Kids and community. American Planning Association Web site. http://www.planning.org/kidsandcommunity/.
2.
Auriat, Nadia, Per Miljeteig, and Louise Chawla. 2001. Overview— identifying best practices in children’s participation. Participatory Learning and Action42:5-8.
3.
Bartlett, Sheridan. 2002. Editorial: Building better cities with children and youth. Environment and Urbanization14 (2): 3-10.
4.
Bartlett, Sheridan, Roger Hart, David Satterthwaite, Ximena de la Barra, and Alfredo Missair. 1999. Cities for children: Children’s rights, poverty and urban management. London: Earthscan.
5.
Beck, Les. 2001. Iowa chapter cosponsors Box City Festival. Iowa Chapter of the American Planning Association: Iowa Planning. http://www.iowa-apa.org/.
6.
Buss, Shirley D. 1994. Children and the urban spatial environment: Meaning and action from young people’s angle of vision. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles.
7.
Center for Understanding the Built Environment. 2002. Homepage. Center for Understanding the Built Environment Web site. http://www.cubekc.org/.
8.
Chawla, Louise. 2001a. Evaluating children’s participation: Seeking areas of consensus. Participatory Learning and Action Notes42:9-13.
9.
Chawla, Louise. 2001b. Putting young old ideas into action: The relevance of Growing Up in Cities to Local Agenda 21. Local Environment6 (1): 13-25.
10.
Chawla, Louise. 2002a. Growing up in an urbanizing world. London:Earthscan.
11.
Chawla, Louise. 2002b. Insight, creativity and thoughts on the environment: Integrating children and youth into human settlement development. Environment and Urbanization14 (2): 11-21.
12.
Chawla, Louise, and Harry Heft. 2002. Children’s competence and the ecology of communities: A functional approach to the evaluation of participation. Journal of Environmental Psychology22 (1/2): 201-216.
13.
Checkoway, Barry. 1998. Involving young people in neighborhood development. Children and Youth Services Review20 (9/10): 765-795.
14.
Checkoway, Barry, David Dobbie, and Katie Richards-Schuster. 2003. Involving young people in community evaluation research. Community Youth Development (CYD) Journal4 (1): 7-11.
15.
Checkoway, Barry, Kameshwari Pothukuchi, and Janet Finn. 1995. Youth participation in community planning: What are the benefits?Journal of Planning Education and Research14 (2): 134-139.
16.
Checkoway, Barry, and Katie Richards-Schuster. 2003. Youth participation in community evaluation research. American Journal of Evaluation24 (1): 21-33.
17.
Corbishley, Peter. 1995. Aparish listens to its children. Children’s Environments12 (4): 414-426.
18.
Corsi, Marco. 2002. The child friendly cities initiative in Italy. Environment and Urbanization14 (2): 169-179.
19.
Cosco, Nilda, and Robin Moore. 2002. Our neighbourhood is like that! Cultural richness and childhood identiy in Boca-Baraccas, Buenos Aires. In Growing up in an urbanizing world, edited by L. Chawla. London: Earthscan.
20.
Dierkx, Rene. 2003. Toward community-based architectural programming and development of inclusive learning environments in Nairobi’s slums. Children, Youth and Environments13 (1). http://colorado.edu/journals/cye.
21.
Driskell, David. 2002. Creating better cities with children and youth. London: Earthscan.
22.
Fetterman, David. 2003. Youth and evaluations: Empowered social-change agents. New Directions for Evaluation98:87-92.
23.
Forester, John. 1989. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
Francis, Mark, and Ray Lorenzo. 2002. Seven realms of children’s participation. Journal of Environmental Psychology22 (1/2): 157-169.
25.
Frank, Kathryn. 2001. Children and youth participation in community and environmental decision-making: A bibliography and resource guide. Unpublished manuscript.
26.
Freeman, Claire, Karen Nairn, and Judith Sligo. 2003. “Professionalising” participation: From rhetoric to practice. Children’s Geographies1 (1): 53-70.
27.
Fuentes, Patricio, and Reiko Niimi. 2002. Motivating municipal action for children: The municipal seal of approval in Ceará, Brazil. Environment and Urbanization14 (2): 123-133.
28.
Gallagher, Claire. 2004. “Our town”: Children as advocatesfor change in the city. Childhood11 (2): 251-262.
29.
Ginwright, Shawn, and Taj James. 2002. From assets to agents of change: Social justice, organizing, and youth development. New Directions in Youth Development96:27-26.
30.
Goodyear, Leslie K., and Barry Checkoway. 2003. Notes from the editor: Establishing the importance of youth participation in community evaluation and research. Community Youth Development (CYD) Journal4 (1): 5-5.
31.
Guerra, Eliana. 2002. Citizenship knows no age: Children’s participation in the governance and municipal budget of Barra Mansa, Brazil. Environment and Urbanization14 (2): 71-84.
32.
Halper, Evan. 2002. Zoning classes redesigned for the real world. Los Angeles Times. May 14, 2002. http://latimes.com.
33.
Halseth, Greg, and Joanne Doddridge. 2000. Children’s cognitive mapping: A potential tool for neighbourhood planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design27 (4): 565-582.
34.
Hart, Roger A.1997. Children’s participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. London: UNICEF.
35.
Hart, Roger A., and Jasmine Rajbhandary. 2003. Using participatory methods to further the democratic goals of children’s organizations. New Directions for Evaluation98:61-75.
36.
Horelli, Liisa. 1997. A methodological approach to children’s participation in urban planning. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research14 (3): 105-15.
37.
Horelli, Liisa, and Mirkka Kaaja. 2002. Opportunities and constraints of “Internet-assisted urban planning” with young people. Journal of Environmental Psychology22 (1/2): 191-200.
38.
KIDS Consortium. 2001. Kids as planners: A guide to strengthening students, schools and communities through service-learning. Lewiston, ME: KIDS Consortium.
39.
Lau, Genevieve, Nancy H. Netherland, and Mary L. Haywood. 2003. Collaborating on evaluation for youth development. New Directions for Evaluation98:47-59.
40.
Lawson, Laura, and Marcia McNally. 1995. Putting teens at the center: Maximizing public utility of urban space through youth involvement in planning and employment. Children’s Environments12 (2): 209-21.
41.
London, Jonathan K., Kristen Zimmerman, and Nancy Erbstein. 2003. Youth-led research and evaluation: Tools for youth, organizational and community development. New Directions for Evaluation98:33-45.
42.
Loukaitou-Sideris, Anastasia. 2003. Children’s common grounds: A study of intergroup relations among children in public settings. Journal of the American Planning Association69 (2): 130-43.
43.
Lynch, Kevin. 1960. The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
Lynch, Kevin. 1977. Growing up in cities: Studies of the spatial environment of adolescence in Cracow, Melbourne, Mexico City, Salta, Toluca, and Warszawa. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press and Paris: UNESCO.
45.
Malone, Karen. 2001. Guest editorial: Children, youth and sustainable cities. Local Environment6 (1): 5-12.
46.
McKeggie, Kim. 2000. El Arco Iris Youth Power Program. Planning66 (4): 14-15.
47.
Moore, Robin C.1990. Childhood’s domain: Play and place in child development. Berkeley, CA: MIG Communications.
48.
Moore, Robin C., and Herbert H. Wong. 1997. Natural learning: The life history of an environmental schoolyard. Berkeley, CA: MIG Communications.
49.
Mullahey, Ramona, Yves Susskind, and Barry Checkoway. 1999. Youth participation in community planning. Chicago: American Planning Association.
50.
O’Donoghue, Jennifer L., Benjamin Kirshner, and Milbrey McLaughlin. 2002. Introduction: Moving youth participation forward. New Directions in Youth Development96:15-26.
51.
Pancer, S. Mark, Linda Rose-Krasnor, and Lisa D. Loiselle. 2002. Youth conferences as a context for engagement. New Directions in Youth Development96:47-64.
52.
Peirce, Neal. 2001. Maryland’s smart growth coup—Engaging the kids. Washington Post Writers Group Web site. http://www.postwritersgroup.com/archives/peir1126.htm.
53.
Percy-Smith, Barry, and Karen Malone. 2001. Making children’s participation in neighbourhood settings relevant to the everyday lives of young people. Participatory Learning and Action Notes42:18-22.
54.
Plester, Beverly, Jenna Richards, Mark Blades, and Christopher Spencer. 2002. Young children’s ability to use aerial photograps as maps. Journal of Environmental Psychology22 (1/2): 29-47.
55.
Race, Bruce, and Carolyn Torma. 1998. Youth planning charettes. Chicago: American Planning Association.
56.
Racelis, Mary, and Angela Desiree M. Aguiree. 2002. Child rights for urban poor children in child friendly Philippine cities: Views from the community. Environment and Urbanization14 (2): 97-113.
57.
Riggio, Eliana. 2002. Child friendly cities: Good governance in the best interests of the child. Environment and Urbanization14(2):45-58.
58.
Robertson, Margaret, and Rex Walford. 2000. Views and visions of land use in the United Kingdom. The Geographical Journal166 (3): 239-54.
59.
Robertson, Margaret, Rex Walford, and David Cooper. 2001. Preferred and actual futures: Young people’s landscape views of the UK. Ethics, Place and Environment4 (3): 205-17.
60.
Sabo, Kim. 2003a. Editor’s notes. New Directions for Evaluation98:1-11.
61.
Sabo, Kim. 2003b. A Vygotskian perspective on youth participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation98:13-24.
62.
Salvadori, Ilaria. 2001. “Remove a fence, invite chaos”: Children as active agents of change. Local Environment6 (1): 87-91.
63.
Sarkissian, Wendy, and Kelvin Walsh, eds. 1994. Community participation in practice casebook. Perth, Australia: Murdoch University, Institute for Science and Technology Policy.
64.
Simpson, Brian. 1997. Towards the participation of children and young people in urban planning and design. Urban Studies34 (5/6): 907-25.
65.
Sutton, Sharon Egretta, and Susan P. Kemp. 2002. Children as partners in neighborhood placemaking: Lessons from intergenerational design charettes. Journal of Environmental Psychology22 (1/2): 171-89.
66.
Talen, Emily, and Mary Coffindaffer. 1999. The utopianism of children: An empirical study of children’s neighborhood design preferences. Journal of Planning Education and Research18 (4): 321-31.
67.
Urban Places Project. 2000. The Youth Power guide: How to make your community better. Amherst:University of Massachusetts Extension.
68.
Urban Plan Project. 2002. Homepage. Urban Plan Project at University of California Berkeley Haas School of Business Web site. http://urbanplan.berkeley.edu/home.html.
69.
Vázquez-Castillo, M. Teresa. 2002. Townview, Texas: A high school adoption program. Planners Network150:8-10.
70.
Voakes, Les. 2003. Listening to the experts. New Directions for Evaluation98:25-32.
71.
Wilhjelm, Hanne. 1995. Children and planning—A recent Norwegian reform to improve the physical environment of children and adolescents. Children’s Environments12 (4): 434-43.
72.
Zapler, Michael. 2002. Youth Neighborhood Association Partnership Program Las Vegas. Planning68 (3): 12-112.
