Many educators are unprepared to meet the needs of students with the most intensive reading intervention needs. The purpose of this review was to identify how researchers have provided professional development (PD) to support educators’ implementation of intensive reading interventions, the extent to which these approaches included essential PD elements, and how researchers have measured implementer outcomes. In the 26 studies reviewed, implementers received initial training, and most received some form of ongoing support. Most studies appeared to incorporate one or more essential PD elements, though many lacked sufficient detail regarding the presence of these elements. Researchers used a variety of fidelity measures and other methods to assess implementer outcomes, which were typically positive. Results of this review indicate the need for researchers to report more detailed descriptions of PD activities, as well as the need for continued research on how best to support teachers’ implementation of intensive reading interventions.
*AllorJ. H.MathesP. G.JonesF. G.ChamplinT. M.CheathamJ. P. (2010). Individualized research-based reading instruction for students with intellectual disabilities: Success stories. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 42, 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991004200301
2.
*AndersonK. L. (2009). The effects of professional development on early reading skills: A comparison of two approaches to word solving. University at Albany, State University of New York.
3.
AustinC. R.VaughnS.McClellandA. M. (2017). Intensive reading interventions for inadequate responders in grades K-3: A synthesis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40, 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717714446
4.
*BockA. K.EricksonK. A. (2015). The influence of teacher epistemology and practice on student engagement in literacy learning. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40, 138–153.
5.
BrockM. E.Cannella-MaloneH. I.SeamanR. L.AndzikN. R.SchaeferJ. M.PageE. J.BarczakM. A.DuekerS. A. (2017). Findings across practitioner training studies in special education: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 84, 7–26.
6.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2016). A meta-analysis of educator training to improve implementation of interventions for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516653477
7.
*BrowderD. M.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.CourtadeG.FlowersC.GibbsS. L. (2008). Evaluation of the effectiveness of an early literacy program for students with significant developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807500102
8.
*BrownK. J.MorrisD.FieldsM. (2005). Intervention after grade 1: Serving increased numbers of struggling readers effectively. Journal of Literacy Research, 37, 61–94.
9.
*BrownellM.KielyM. T.HaagerD.BoardmanA.CorbettN.AlginaJ.UrbachJ. (2017). Literacy learning cohorts: Content-focused approach to improving special education teachers’ reading instruction. Exceptional Children, 83, 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916671517
10.
BryantD. P.VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS.UgelN.HamffA.HougenM. (2000). Reading outcomes for students with and without reading disabilities in general education middle-school content area classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 238–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511347
11.
BursuckW.SmithT.MunkD.DamerM.MehligL.PerryJ. (2004). Evaluating the impact of a prevention-based model of reading on children who are at risk. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 303–313.
12.
*De La CruzC. F. (2009). A program evaluation of a literacy initiative for students with moderate to severe disabilities. ProQuest LLC.
*DentonC. A.FletcherJ. M.AnthonyJ. L.FrancisD. J. (2006). An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390050601
15.
*DentonC. A.TolarT. D.FletcherJ. M.BarthA. E.VaughnS.FrancisD. J. (2013). Effects of Tier 3 intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties and characteristics of inadequate responders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 633–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032581
16.
*DentonC. A.WexlerJ.VaughnS.BryanD. (2008). Intervention provided to linguistically diverse middle school students with severe reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 79–89.
17.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
18.
DesimoneL. M.GaretM. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7, 252. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515
19.
*DingleM. P.BrownellM. T.LekoM. M.BoardmanA. G.HaagerD. (2011). Developing effective special education reading teachers: The influence of professional development, context, and individual qualities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 34, 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871103400106
20.
ElbaumB.VaughnS.Tejero HughesM.Watson MoodyS. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605–619.
21.
Every Student Succeeds Act, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 stat. 1177 (2015).
22.
FallonL. M.Collier-MeekM. A.MagginD. M.SanettiL. M.JohnsonA. H. (2015). Is performance feedback for educators an evidence-based practice? A systematic review and evaluation based on single-case research. Exceptional Children, 81, 227–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914551738
23.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78, 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800301
24.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2014). What is intensive instruction and why is it important?TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46, 13–18.
25.
*FuchsL. S.DenoS. L.MirkinP. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449–460. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312021002449
26.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.MaloneA. S. (2018). The taxonomy of intervention intensity. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50, 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918758166
27.
GaretM. S.PorterA. C.DesimoneL.BirmanB. F.Suk YoonK. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
28.
*GelzheiserL. M.ScanlonD.VellutinoF.Hallgren-FlynnL. (2011). Effects of the interactive strategies approach—Extended. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 280–306.
29.
GerstenR.ComptonD.ConnorC. M.DiminoJ.SantoroL.Linan-ThompsonS.TillyW. D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades: A practice guide (NCEE 2009-4045). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/3
30.
*Hof-DunnD. C. (2015). The effect of Leveled Literacy Intervention on first and second grade student literacy achievement [Doctoral dissertation, Missouri Baptist University].
*JitendraA. K.EdwardsL. L.StarostaK.SacksG.JacobsonL. A.ChoutkaC. M. (2004). Early reading instruction for children with reading difficulties: Meeting the needs of diverse learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 421–439.
33.
JungP. G.McMasterK. L.KunkelA. K.ShinJ.SteckerP. M. (2018). Effects of data-based individualization for students with intensive learning needs: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33, 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12172
LemonsC. J.Al OtaibaS.ConwayS. J.Mellado De La CruzV. (2016). Improving professional development to enhance reading outcomes for students in special education. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016, 87–104.
36.
*MathesP. G.DentonC. A.FletcherJ. M.AnthonyJ. L.FrancisD. J.SchatschneiderC. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148–182. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.40.2.2
*NeugebauerS. R.ChafouleasS. M.CoyneM. D.McCoachD. B.BrieschA. M. (2016). Exploring an ecological model of perceived usability within a multi-tiered vocabulary intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 41, 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508415619732
39.
O’ConnorR. E.FulmerD.HartyK. R.BellK. M. (2005). Layers of reading intervention in kindergarten through third grade: Changes in teaching and student outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 440–455.
40.
*PinnellG. S.LyonsC. A.DefordD. E.BrykA. S.SeltzerM. (1994). Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high-risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 8–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/747736
41.
ProctorE. K.PowellB. J.McMillenJ. C. (2013). Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implementation Science, 8, 139.
42.
PullenP. C.TuckwillerE. D.AshworthK.LovelaceS. P.CashD. (2011). Implementing intensive vocabulary instruction for students at risk for reading disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 145–157.
43.
ScammaccaN.VaughnS.RobertsG.WanzekJ.TorgesenJ. K. (2007). Extensive reading interventions in grades K-3: From research to practice. Center on Instruction, RMC Research Corporation.
44.
*SiutyM. B.LekoM. M.KnackstedtK. M. (2016). Unraveling the role of curriculum in teacher decision making. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416683230
45.
SnowC. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation.
46.
Spear-SwerlingL.CheesemanE. (2012). Teachers’ knowledge base for implementing response-to-intervention models in reading. Reading and Writing, 25, 1691–1723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9338-3
47.
*TammL.DentonC. A.EpsteinJ. N.SchatschneiderC.TaylorH.ArnoldL. E.. . . VaughnA. (2017). Comparing treatments for children with ADHD and word reading difficulties: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85, 434–446.
48.
*TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A.HerronJ.LindamoodP. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in students at risk for dyslexia: Outcomes from two instructional approaches. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 40–56.
*VadasyP. F.SandersE. A. (2011). Efficacy of supplemental phonics-based instruction for low-skilled first graders: How language minority status and pretest characteristics moderate treatment response. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.501091
51.
*VadasyP. F.SandersE. A.AbbottR. D. (2008). Effects of supplemental early reading intervention at 2-year follow up: Reading skill growth patterns and predictors. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 51–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701746906
52.
*VadasyP. F.SandersE. A.PeytonJ. A. (2005). Relative effectiveness of reading practice or word-level instruction in supplemental tutoring. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380041401
53.
Vernon-FeagansL.KainzK.HedrickA.GinsbergM.AmendumS. (2013). Live webcam coaching to help early elementary classroom teachers provide effective literacy instruction for struggling readers: The targeted reading intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 1175–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032143
54.
WanzekJ.StevensE. A.WilliamsK. J.ScammaccaN.VaughnS.SargentK. (2018). Current evidence on the effects of intensive early reading interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51, 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418775110
55.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2009). Students demonstrating persistent low response to reading intervention: Three case studies. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00289.x
56.
WanzekJ.VaughnS.ScammaccaN. K.GatlinB.WalkerM. A.CapinP. (2016). Meta-analyses of the effects of Tier 2 type reading interventions in grades K-3. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 551–576.
57.
WanzekJ.VaughnS.ScammaccaN. K.MetzK.MurrayC. S.RobertsG.DanielsonL. (2013). Extensive reading interventions for students with reading difficulties after grade 3. Review of Educational Research, 83, 163–195.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
