A 2-year, randomized control trial with 9th to 10th grade students with significant reading problems was provided for 50 minutes a day in small groups. Comparison students were provided an elective class and treatment students the reading intervention. Students were identified as demonstrating reading difficulties through failure on their state accountability test and were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions and a business as usual (BAU) condition: reading without dropout prevention, reading with dropout prevention, dropout prevention without reading, or a BAU condition. Findings from the 2-year reading intervention (reading with and without dropout prevention combined and BAU) are reported in this article. Students in reading treatment compared to students in BAU demonstrated significant gains on reading comprehension (effect size = .43), and improved reading was associated with better grades in social studies. Findings from this study provide a rationale for further implementation and investigation of intensive intervention for high school students with reading difficulties.
AndersonA. R.ChristensonS. L.SinclairM. F.LehrC. A. (2004). Check & Connect: The importance of relationships for promoting engagement with school. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 95-113.
2.
ArcherA. L.GleasonM. M.VachonV. (2005). REWARDS Plus: Reading strategies applied to social studies passages. Longmont, CO: Sopris West Educational Services.
3.
BaumannJ. F.FontG.EdwardsE. C.BolandE. (2005). Strategies for teaching middle-grade students to use word-part and context clues to expand reading vocabulary. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary: Bringing Research to Practice, 3, 179-205.
4.
BergerudD.LovittT. C.HortonS. (1988). The effectiveness of textbook adaptations in life science for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(2), 70-76.
5.
BhattacharyaA.EhriL. C. (2004). Graphosyllabic analysis helps adolescent struggling readers read and spell words. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(4), 331-348.
6.
BoardmanA. G.RobertsG.VaughnS.WexlerJ.MurrayC. S.KosanovichM. (2008). Effective instruction for adolescent struggling readers: A practice brief. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
7.
BovairdT. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846-860.
8.
BrownA. L.DayJ. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 1-14.
9.
CantrellS. C.AlmasiJ. F.CarterJ. C.RintamaaM.MaddenA. (2010). The impact of a strategy-based intervention on the comprehension and strategy use of struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 257.
10.
ChamberlainA.DanielsC. N.MaddenN.SlavinR. (2007). A randomized evaluation of the Success for All Middle School reading program. Middle Grades Research Journal, 2(1), 1-21.
11.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T.DayA. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12.
Cordero-PonceW. L. (2000). Summarization instruction: Effects on foreign language comprehension and summarization of expository texts. Literacy Research and Instruction, 39(4), 329-350.
13.
EdmondsM. S.VaughnS.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC.CableA.TackettK. K.SchnakenbergJ. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 262-300.
14.
FeingoldA. (2009). Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 43-53.
15.
HillC. J.BloomH. S.BlackA. R.LipseyM. W. (2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2(3), 172-177.
16.
HortonS. V.LovittT. C.ChristensenC. C. (1991). Notetaking from textbooks: Effects of a columnar format on three categories of secondary students. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, 2(1), 19-40.
17.
HortonS. V.LovittT. C.GivensA.NelsonR. (1989). Teaching social studies to high school students with academic handicaps in a mainstreamed setting effects of a computerized study guide. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(2), 102-107.
18.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
19.
KamilM. L.BormanG. D.DoleJ.KralC. C.SalingerT.TorgesenJ. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc
20.
KiefferM. J.LesauxN. K. (2008). The role of derivational morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing, 21(8), 783-804.
21.
KimJ. S.SamsonJ. F.FitzgeraldR.HartryA. (2010). A randomized experiment of a mixed-methods literacy intervention for struggling readers in grades 4–6: Effects on word reading efficiency, reading comprehension and vocabulary, and oral reading fluency. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1109-1129.
22.
KlingnerJ.MorrisonA.EppolitoA. (2011). Metacognition to improve reading comprehension. In O’ConnorR. E.VadasyP. F. (Eds.), Handbook of reading interventions (pp. 220-253). New York: The Guilford Press.
23.
LangL.TorgesenJ.VogelW.ChanterC.LefskyE.PetscherY. (2009). Exploring the relative effectiveness of reading interventions for high school students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(2), 149-175.
MacKinnonD. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Erlbaum.
26.
McArdleJ. J. (2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analysis. In CudeckR.du ToitM.SorbomD. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 341-380). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
27.
McCruddenM. T.MaglianoJ. P.SchrawG. (2010). Exploring how relevance instructions affect personal reading intentions, reading goals and text processing: A mixed methods study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(4), 229-241.
28.
MillerB.McCardleP.HernandezR. (2010). Advances and remaining challenges in adult literacy research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(2), 101-107.
29.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2007). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables; User’s guide (Version 5). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
30.
NagyW.BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 134.
31.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
32.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
33.
RobertsG.VaughnM.VaughnS.FallA.SchnakenbergJ.ColemanM.WexlerJ. (2013). School engagement: Malleability and treatment effects in a randomized control trial. Manuscript submitted for publication.
34.
ScammaccaN.RobertsG.VaughnS.EdmondsM.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC. K.TorgesenJ. (2007). Intervention for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implication for practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
35.
SeligJ. P.PreacherK. J. (2009). Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmental research. Research in Human Development, 6(2-3), 144-164.
SomersM. A.CorrinW.SepanikS.SalingerT.LevinJ.ZmachC. (2010). The Enhanced Reading Opportunities Study final report: The impact of supplemental literacy courses for struggling ninth-grade readers (NCEE 2010–4022). Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20104021/pdf/20104021.pdf
TorgesenJ. K.HoustonD.RissmanL.DeckerS.RobertsG.VaughnS.LesauxN. K. (2007). Academic literacy instruction for adolescents: A guiding document from the Center on Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
40.
ValentineJ. C.McHughC. M. (2007). The effects of attrition on baseline comparability in randomized experiments in education: A meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(3), 268.
41.
VaughnS.FletcherJ. M. (2012). Response to intervention with secondary school students with reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 241-253.
42.
Vaughn Gross Center for Reading and Language Arts at The University of Texas at Austin. (2010). Vocabulary and oral language development. Austin, TX: Author.
43.
VaughnS.KlingnerJ. K.SwansonE. A.BoardmanA. G.RobertsG.MohammedS. S.Stillman-SpisakS. J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students*. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 938-964.
44.
VaughnS.WanzekJ.MurrayC. S.RobertsG. (2012). Intensive interventions for students struggling in reading and mathematics: A practice guide. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
45.
VaughnS.WexlerJ.LerouxA. J.RobertsG.DentonC. A.BarthA. E.FletcherJ. M. (2011). Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(6), 515-525.
46.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 541-561.
47.
WanzekJ.WexlerJ.VaughnS.CiulloS. (2010). Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 889-912.
48.
WillinghamD. T. (2007). Critical thinking: Why it is so hard to teach?American Educator, Summer, 8-19.
49.
WuA. D.LiZ.ZumboB. D. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12(3), 1-26.
