The authors summarize evidence from a multiyear study with secondary students with reading difficulties on (a) the potential efficacy of primary-level (Tier 1), secondary-level (Tier 2), and tertiary-level (Tier 3) interventions in remediating reading difficulties with middle school students, (b) the likelihood of resolving reading disabilities with older students with intractable reading disabilities, (c) the reliability, validity, and use of screening and progress monitoring measures with middle school students, and (d) the implications of implementing response to intervention (RTI) practices at the middle school level. The authors provide guidance about prevailing questions about remediating reading difficulties with secondary students and discuss future directions for research using RTI frameworks for students at the secondary level.
ArcherA. L.GleasonM. M.VachonV. L. (2003). Decoding and fluency: Foundation skills for struggling older readers. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 26(2), 89–101.
BarthA. E.RomainM.CirinoP. T.DentonC. A.VaughnS.FletcherJ. M.FrancisD. J. (2010). The reliability and validity of one minute vs. full passage fluency among middle school readers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4.
BarthA. E.StuebingK. K.FletcherJ. M.CirinoP. T.FrancisD. J.VaughnS. (2010). Reliability and validity of the median score when assessing the oral reading fluency of middle grade readers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5.
BarthA. E.TolarT.CirinoP. T.FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M.VaughnS. (2011). Form effects on the oral reading fluency of middle school students. Manuscript submitted for publication.
6.
BurnsM.AppletonJ. J.StehouwerJ. D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(4), 381–394.
CorrinW.SomersM. A.KempleJ.NelsonE.SepanikS. (2008). The enhanced reading opportunities study: Findings from the second year of implementation (NCEE 2009–4036). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences.
9.
CuttingL. E.ScarboroughH. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277–299.
10.
DentonC. A.BryanD.WexlerJ.ReedD.VaughnS. (2007). Effective instruction for middle school students with reading difficulties: The reading teacher’s sourcebook. Austin: University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency.
11.
DentonC. A.FletcherJ. M.AnthonyJ. L.FrancisD. J. (2006). An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 447–466.
12.
DonovanM. S.CrossC. T. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. National Research Council, Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education, Division for Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
13.
EdmondsM. S.VaughnS.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC.CableA.TackettK. K.SchnakenbergJ. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79, 262–300. doi:10.3102/003465430832599810.3102/0034654308325998
14.
EspinC. A.WallaceT.LembkeE.CampbellH.LongJ. D. (2010). Creating a progress measurement system in reading for middle-school student: Monitoring progress towards meeting high stakes standards. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 60–75.
15.
FletcherJ. M.CoulterW. A.ReschlyD. J.VaughnS. (2004). Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(2), 304–331.
16.
FletcherJ. M.LyonG. R.FuchsL. S.BarnesM. A. (2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York, NY: Guilford.
17.
FletcherJ. M.VaughnS. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic deficits. Child Development and Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37. doi:10.1111/j.1750–8606.2008.00072.x10.1111/j.1750–8606.2008.00072.x
18.
FrancisD. J.SantiK. L.BarrC.FletcherJ. M.VariscoA.FoormanB. R. (2008). Form effects on the estimation of students’ oral reading fluency using DIBELS. Journal of School Psychology, 46(3), 315–342.
19.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.StecklerP. M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 301–323.
20.
FuchsD.MockD.MorganP. L.YoungC. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 157–171. doi:10.1111/1540–5826.0007210.1111/1540–5826.00072
21.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L. (2010). Rethinking response to intervention at middle and high school. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 22–28.
22.
HockM. F.BrasseurI. F.DeshlerD. D.CattsH. W.MarquisJ. G.MarkC. A.StriblingJ. W. (2009). What is the reading component skill profile of adolescent struggling readers in urban schools?Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(1), 21–38.
23.
IkedaM. J.TillyW. D. I.StummeJ.VolmerL.AllisonR. (1996). Agency-wide implementation of problem solving consultation: Foundations, current implementation, and future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 11(3), 228–243.
24.
James-BurdumyS.MansfieldW.DekeJ.CareyN.Lugo-GilJ.HersheyA.. . . FaddisB. (2009). Effectiveness of selected supplemental reading comprehension interventions: Impacts on a first cohort of fifth-grade students (NCEE 2009–4032). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences.
25.
KempleJ.CorrinW.NelsonE.SalingerT.HerrmannS.DrummondK.StrasbergP. (2008). The enhanced reading opportunities study: Early impact and implementation findings (NCEE 2008-4015). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences.
26.
Lexile Framework for Reading. (2007). Lexile Framework for Reading. Durham, NC: MetaMetrics.
27.
MarstonD.MuyskensP.LauM.CanterA. (2003). Problem-solving models for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 187–200. doi:10.1111/1540–5826.0007410.1111/1540–5826.00074
28.
MathesP. G.DentonC. A.FletcherJ. M.AnthonyJ. L.FrancisD. J.SchatschneiderC. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(2), 148–182.
29.
ReedD.VaughnS. (2010). Reading interventions for older students. In GloverT. A.VaughnS. (Eds.), The promise of response to intervention: Evaluating current science and practice (pp. 143–186). New York, NY: Guilford.
30.
ReschlyD. J.TillyW. D.IIIGrimesJ. P. (Eds.). (1999). Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
31.
ScammaccaN.RobertsG.VaughnS.EdmondsM.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC. K.TorgesenJ. K. (2007). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
SteckerP. M.FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in Schools, 42(8), 795–819. doi:0.1002/pits.201130.1002/pits.20113
34.
Texas Education Agency. (2006). Report on the Texas Assessment Program: A report to the 80th Texas legislature. Austin: Author.
35.
TorgesenJ. K.HoustonD. D.RissmanL. M.DeckerS. M.RobertsG.VaughnS.. . . LesauxN. K. (2007). Academic literacy instruction for adolescents: A guidance document from the Center on Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
36.
VanDerHeydenA. M.BurnsM. K. (2010). Essentials of response to intervention. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
37.
VaughnS. (2010, February). Intensity of intervention to achieve student growth: Perspectives from the NICHD LDRC research projects. Paper presented at the Pacific Coast Research Conference, Coronado, CA.
38.
VaughnS.CirinoP. T.WanzekJ.WexlerJ.FletcherJ. M.DentonC. A.. . . FrancisD. J. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 3–21.
39.
VaughnS.FletcherJ. M. (2010). Thoughts on rethinking RTI with secondary students. School Psychology Review, 39(2), 296–299.
40.
VaughnS.FletcherJ. M.FrancisD. J.DentonC. A.WanzekJ.WexlerJ.. . . RomainM. A. (2008). Response to intervention with older students with reading difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(3), 338–345.
41.
VaughnS.FuchsL. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 137–146. doi:10.1111/1540–5826.0007010.1111/1540–5826.00070
42.
VaughnS.WanzekJ.FletcherJ. M. (2007). Multiple tiers of intervention: A framework for prevention and identification of students with reading/learning disabilities. In TaylorB. M.YsseldykeJ. E. (Eds.), Effective instruction for struggling readers, K–6 (pp. 173–195). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
43.
VaughnS.WanzekJ.WexlerJ.BarthA.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M.. . . FrancisD. J. (2010). The relative effects of group size on reading progress of older students with reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 931–956. doi:10.1007/s11145–009–9183–910.1007/s11145–009–9183–9
44.
VaughnS.WexlerJ.RobertsG.BarthA. E.CirinoP. T.RomainM.. . . DentonC. A. (2011). The Effects of individualized and standardized interventions on middle school students with reading disabilities. Exceptional Children, 77(4), 391-407.
45.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.SmallS.FanueleD. P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 157–169.
46.
WalkerH. M.FornessS. R.KauffmanJ. M.EpsteinM. H.GreshamF. M.NelsonC. M.StrainP. S. (1998). Macro-social validation: Referencing outcomes in behavioral disorders to societal issues and problems. Behavioral Disorders, 24(1), 7–18.
47.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 541–561.
48.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2009). Students demonstrating persistent low response to reading intervention: Three case studies. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(3), 151–163.
49.
WanzekJ.VaughnS.RobertsG.FletcherJ. M. (in press). Efficacy of a reading intervention for middle school students identified with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children.
50.
WaymanM. M.WallaceT.WileyH. I.TicháR.EspinC. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. Journal of Special Education, 41, 85–120.
