Students with disabilities who experience significant early literacy challenges need structured reading instruction. This study documents the initial efficacy of Friends on the Block (www.friendsontheblock.com), a comprehensive and flexible program designed for students with intensive early literacy needs. Elementary-age students with disabilities and intensive early literacy needs, including those with intellectual and developmental disabilities, were randomly assigned to either the Friends on the Block intervention group (n = 31) or the standard business-as-usual instruction group (n = 31). The analysis revealed statistically and educationally significant differences favoring Friends on the Block on two out of five measures of phonological awareness and all measures of decoding, word reading fluency, and comprehension. Except for one measure of listening comprehension, no differences were found on measures of language or vocabulary. Findings support increased literacy expectations for students with disabilities who require intensive literacy support, including those with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
AllisonP. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/271083
2.
AllorJ. H.Al OtaibaS. (2025). Raising literacy expectations for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Lessons from a series of research studies of Friends on the Block. The Reading League Journal, 6(2), 34–42. https://www.thereadingleague.org/journal/
AllorJ. H.GiffordD. B.JonesF. G.Al OtaibaS.YovanoffP.OrtizM. B.CheathamJ. P. (2018). The effects of a text-centered literacy curriculum for students with intellectual disability. American Journal for Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 123, 474–494. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-123.5.474
5.
AllorJ. H.MathesP. G.RobertsJ. K.CheathamJ. P.OtaibaS. A. (2014). Is scientifically based reading instruction effective for students with below-average IQs?Exceptional Children, 80(3), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914522208
6.
AllorJ. H.YovanoffP.OtaibaS. A.OrtizM. B.ConnerC. (2020). Evidence for a literacy intervention for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 55(3), 290–302.
7.
Al OtaibaS.McMasterK.WanzekJ.ZaruM. W. (2023). What we know and need to know about literacy interventions for elementary students with reading difficulties and disabilities, including dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly, 58, 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.458
8.
BakkenR. K.NæssK.-A.LemonsC.HjetlandH. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of reading and writing interventions for students with disorders of intellectual development. Education Sciences, 11, Article 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100638
9.
BedeianA.SturmanM.StreinerD. (2009). Decimal dust, significant digits, and the search for stars. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 687–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108321153
10.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
11.
BennerG. J.NelsonJ. R.StageS.RalstonN. (2011). The influence of fidelity of implementation on the reading outcomes of middle school students experiencing reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 32(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361265
12.
BradfordS.ShippenM. E.AlbertoP.HouchinsD. E.FloresM. (2006). Using systematic instruction to teach decoding skills to middle school students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 333–343.
BrowderD.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.FlowersC.BakerJ. (2012). An evaluation of a multicomponent early literacy program for students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33(4), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510387305
15.
BrowderD. M.WakemanS. Y.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.AlgozzineB. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200401
16.
CampbellA. R.Bowman-PerrottL.BurkeM. D.SalleseM. R. (2018). Reading, writing, math, and content-area interventions for improving behavioral and academic outcomes of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 16(2), 119–138.
17.
CanivezG. L.Graham LaughlinT. (2021). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (5th ed.). In J. F. Carlson, K. F. Geisinger, & J. L. Jonson (Eds.), The twenty-first mental measurements yearbook. Buros Center for Testing.
18.
CarneyR. N.MatthewsM. S. (2020). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (4th ed.). In J. F. Carlson, K. F. Geisinger, & J. L. Jonson (Eds.), The twenty-first mental measurements yearbook. Buros Center for Testing.
19.
CastlesA.RastleK.NationK. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
20.
ConnerC.AllorJ. H.Al OtaibaS.YovanoffP.LeJeuneL. (2024). Early reading outcomes in response to a comprehensive reading curriculum for students with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 39(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576221137905
21.
ConnersF. A.RosenquistC. J.SlighA. C.AtwellJ. A.KiserT. (2006). Phonological reading skills acquisition by children with mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.015
22.
ConnorC. M.AlbertoP. A.ComptonD. L.O’ConnorR. E. (2014). Improving reading outcomes for students with or at risk for reading disabilities: A synthesis of the contributions from the Institute of Education Sciences Research Centers (NCSER Publication No. 2014-3000). National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
23.
DeVeneyS.SmithJ. K. (2021). Expressive Vocabulary Test: The twenty-first mental measurements yearbook (3rd ed.).
24.
DiamondK. E.JusticeL. M.SieglerR. S.SnyderP. A. (2013). Synthesis of IES Research on Early Intervention and Early Childhood Education (NCSER 2013–3001). National Center for Special Education Research.
25.
DunnD. M. (2019). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (5th ed.). NCS Pearson.
26.
EdmondsM.BriggsK. L. (2003). The instructional content emphasis instrument: Observations of reading instruction. In VaughnS.BriggsK. L. (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for the observation of teaching and learning (pp. 31–52). Brookes.
27.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2015).
28.
FloresM. M.NelsonC.HintonV.FranklinT. M.StrozierS. D.TerryL.FranklinS. (2013). Teaching reading comprehension and language skills to students with autism spectrum disorders and developmental disabilities using direct instruction. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 41–48. https://www.daddcec.com/etadd.html
FoormanB.BeylerN.BorradaileK.CoyneM.DentonC. A.DiminoJ.FurgesonJ.HayesL.HenkeJ.JusticeL.KeatingB.LewisW.SattarS.StrekeA.WagnerR.WisselS. (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE publication no. 2016–4008). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. http://whatworks.ed.gov.
31.
FredrickL. D.DavisD. H.AlbertoP.WaughR. E. (2013). From initial phonics to functional phonics: Teaching word-analysis skills to students with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/215416471304800106
GerstenR.HaymondK.Newman-GoncharR.DiminoJ.JayanthiM. (2020). Meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions for students in the primary grades. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1689591
34.
GilmourA. F.FuchsD.WehbyJ. H. (2019). Are students with disabilities accessing the curriculum? A meta-analysis of the reading achievement gap between students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 85(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918795830
HallC.DahlL. K.ChoE.SolariE. J.CapinP.ConnerC.HenryA.CookL.HayesL.VargasI.RichmondC.KehoeK. (2023). Forty years of reading intervention research for elementary students with or at risk for dyslexia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(2), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.477
37.
HillC. J.BloomH. S.BlackA. R.LipseyM. W. (2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2(3), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00061.x
38.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et esq. ( (reauthorization of Individuals with Disabilities Act 1990).
39.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (2nd ed.). Pearson.
40.
KimY. S. G. (2020). Toward integrative reading science: The direct and indirect effects model of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(6), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420908239
41.
Kisbu-SakaryaY.MacKinnonD.AikenL. (2013). A Monte Carlo comparison study of the power of the analysis of covariance, simple difference and residual change scores in testing two-wave data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412450574
LemonsC. J.KingS. A.DavidsonK. A.PuranikC. S.Al OtaibaS.FulmerD.MrachkoA. A.PartanenJ.FidlerD. J. (2017). Developing an early reading intervention aligned with the Down syndrome behavioral phenotype. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615618941
National Council on Teacher Quality Audit Panel. (2014). Audit panel statement on the NCTQ teacher prep review. National Council on Teacher Quality. http://nctq.org/dmsView.do?id=2181
51.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH publication no. 00-4754). National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
52.
NeitzelA. J.LakeC.PellegriniM.SlavinR. E. (2022). A synthesis of quantitative research on programs for struggling readers in elementary schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(1), 149–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.379
53.
PetersenD. B.SpencerT. D. (2016). CUBED-3. Language Dynamics Group.
54.
SAS Institute Inc. (2023). SAS/STAT (Version 9.2) [Computer software]. https://www.sas.com
55.
SaundersK. J. (2007). Word-attack skills in individuals with mental retardation. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20137
56.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Quasi-experiments: Interrupted time-series designs. In Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (pp. 171–205). Houghton Mifflin.
57.
ShanahanT.CallisonK.CarriereC.DukeN. K.PearsonP. D.SchatschneiderC.TorgesenJ. (2010). Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through 3rd grade: IES practice guide (NCEE publication no. 2010-4038). What Works Clearinghouse.
58.
SinclairA. C.GeselS. A.LeJeuneL. M.LemonsC. J. (2020). A review of the evidence for real-time performance feedback to improve instructional practice. The Journal of Special Education, 54(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919878470
59.
SlavinR. E.LakeC.DavisS.MaddenN. A. (2011). Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Educational Research Review, 6(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.002
60.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A.PearsonN. A. (2013). Comprehensive test of phonological processing (2nd ed.). APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t52630-000
61.
WanzekJ.StevensE. A.WilliamsK. J.ScammaccaN.VaughnS.SargentK. (2018). Current evidence on the effects of intensive early reading interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418775110
62.
WechslerD. (2020). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (4th ed.). NCS Pearson.
63.
WeiX.BlackorbyJ.SchillerE. (2011). Growth in reading achievement of students with disabilities, ages 7 to 17. Exceptional Children, 78(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107800106
What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook (Version 5.0) (2022008REV). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/.
66.
WilliamsK. T. (2019). Expressive Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). NCS Pearson.
