Situating Evaluation and Authority: Direct Sponsorship in Letters of Recommendation

Abstract

The letter of recommendation (LOR) is a stylized form of direct sponsorship, a rhetorical appeal that confers favor on a person or object in keeping with the writer’s—or sponsor’s—character, authority, and expertise. In response to Swales’s call to “unveil” the rhetorical features of occluded genres, this research employs a move-step analysis to determine the rhetorical features of a sample of 83 LORs written by college faculty and administrators for a nationally competitive, postgraduate fellowship. This study finds five core moves expressed in its LOR sample: (1) sponsor positioning, (2) applicant performance, (3) applicant attributes, (4) future projection, and (5) audience appeals. Our discussion offers three key insights and provides macro-level takeaways in an effort to raise rhetorical awareness for LOR writers and requestors alike.

Keywords

letters of recommendation occluded genre move-step analysis direct sponsorship fellowships grant-writing professional communication application support

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aamodt

M. G.

Bryan

D. A.

Whitcomb

A. J.

(1993). Predicting performance with letters of recommendation. Public Personnel Management, 22, 81-90.

Aimoldina

Zharkynbekova

(2013). Rhetorical and pragmalinguistic features of business correspondence: The case of sales letters in intercultural business communication in Kazakhstan. Journal of Applied Linguistics & Professional Practice, 10(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.30632

Aull

(2019). Linguistic markers of stance and genre in upper-level student writing. Written Communication, 36(2), 267-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318819472

Bell

Cole

C. S.

Floge

(1992). Letters of recommendation in academe: Do women and men write different languages? The American Sociologist, 23, 7-22.

Bhatia

V. K.

(1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.

Bhatia

V. K.

(2005). Generic patterns in promotional discourse. In Halmari

Virtanen

(Eds.), Persuasion across genres: A linguistic approach (pp. 213-225). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Biernat

Eidelman

(2007). Translating subjective language in letters of recommendation: The case of the sexist professor. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1149-1175. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.432

Bouton

L. F.

(1995). A cross-cultural analysis of the structure and content of letters of reference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(2), 211-244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014169

Brandt

(2001). Literacy in American lives. Cambridge University Press.

10.

Bruland

H. H.

(2009). Rhetorical cues and cultural clues: An analysis of the recommendation letter in English studies. Rhetoric Review, 28(1), 406-424.

11.

Colarelli

S. M.

Hechanova-Alampay

Canali

K. G.

(2002). Letters of recommendation: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Human Relations, 55(3), 315-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702553002

12.

Dirschl

Adams

G. L.

(2000). Reliability in evaluating letters of recommendation. Academic Medicine, 75(10), 1029-1029. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200010000-00022

13.

Dutt

Pfaff

D. L.

Bernstein

A. F.

Dillard

J. S.

Block

C. J.

(2016). Gender differences in recommendation letters for postdoctoral fellowships in geoscience. Nature Geoscience, 9(11), 805-808. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2819

14.

Feak

C. B.

Swales

J. M.

(2009). Telling a research story: Writing a literature review. University of Michigan Press.

15.

Ferguson

(2012). The letter of recommendation as strange work. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 127(4), 954-962. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2012.127.4.954

16.

Flowerdew

Dudley-Evans

(2002). Genre analysis of editorial letters to international journal contributors. Applied linguistics, 23(4), 463-489.

17.

Girzadas

D. V.

Jr. Harwood

R. C.

Dearie

Garrett

(1998). A comparison of standardized and narrative letters of recommendation. Academic Emergency Medicine, 5(11), 1101-1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02670.x

18.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing.

19.

Grote

C. L.

Robiner

W. N.

Haut

(2001). Disclosure of negative information in letters of recommendation: ’Writers’ intentions and ’readers’ experiences. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32(6), 655-661. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.32.6.655

20.

Harry

. Truman Scholarship Foundation. (n.d.-a). Letters of recommendation. https://www.truman.gov/apply/advice-guidance/letters-recommendation

21.

Harry

. Truman Scholarship Foundation. (n.d.-b). Before applying. https://www.truman.gov/apply/applying

22.

Horwood

McDermott

Gennell

Pawlik

T. M.

Grignol

V. P.

Hughes

T. M.

(2021). Letters of recommendation for surgical fellowships - Does gender make a difference? The American Journal of Surgery, 221(1), 90-94.

23.

Houser

Lemmons

(2018). Implicit bias in letters of recommendation for an undergraduate research internship. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(5), 585-595. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1301410

24.

Hyon

(2008). Convention and inventiveness in an occluded academic genre: A case study of retention-promotion-tenure reports. English for Specific Purposes, 27(2), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.003

25.

Kaffenberger

(2016). A retrospective analysis comparing the new standardized letter of recommendation in dermatology with the classic narrative letter of recommendation. The Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, 9(9), 36-42.

26.

Kuncel

N. R.

Kochevar

R. J.

Ones

D. S.

(2014). A meta-analysis of letters of recommendation in college and graduate admissions: Reasons for hope. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(1), 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12060

27.

Landis

J. R.

Koch

G. G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. www.jstor.org/stable/2529310

28.

Lee

P. C.

(2016). Philanthropic discourse vs promotional genre: To study the rhetorical choices of promotion and structural moves of two appeal letters in Hong Kong. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(5), 15-23.

29.

Liu

O. L.

Minsky

Ling

Kyllonen

(2009). Using the standardized letters of recommendation in selection: Results from a multidimensional Rasch model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 475-492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408322031

30.

Loher

B. T.

Hazer

J. T.

Tsai

Tilton

James

(1997). Letters of reference: A process approach. Journal of Business and Psychology, 11, 339-355.

31.

Madera

J. M.

Hebl

M. R.

Martin

R. C.

(2009). Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1591-1599. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016539

32.

Maskara

Lau

Lin

C-Y.

(2014). A comparative study of recommendation letters issued by Indian and British authors. Voices in Asia Journal, 2, 1-17.

33.

McCarthy

J. M.

Goffin

R. D.

(2001). Improving the validity of letters of recommendation: An investigation of three standardized reference forms. Military Psychology, 13(4), 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327876MP1304_2

34.

Miller

R. K.

Van Rybroek

G. J.

(1988). Internship letters of recommendation: Where are the other 90%? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19(1), 115-117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.19.1.115

35.

Misra

Lundquist

J. H.

Templer

(2012). Gender, work time, and care responsibilities among faculty. Sociological Forum, 27(2), 300-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2012.01319.x

36.

Moreno

Swales

J. M.

(2017). Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 40-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.006

37.

National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. (2022). Overview: Spring 2022 enrollment estimates. Retrieved June 2, 2023, from https://nscresearchcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/CTEE_Report_Spring_2022.pdf

38.

Precht

(1998). A cross-cultural comparison of letters of recommendation. English for Specific Purposes, 17(3), 241-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00012-4

39.

Rim

(1976). How reliable are letters of recommendation? The Journal of Higher Education, 47(4), 437-445. https://doi.org/10.2307/1978728

40.

Rowley-Jolivet

Carter-Thomas

(2005). The rhetoric of conference presentation introductions: Context, argument and interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 45-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.00080.x

41.

Ryan

Martinson

D. L.

(2000). Perceived effects of exaggeration in recommendation letters. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 55(1), 40-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769580005500105

42.

Saldaña

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

43.

Salgado

(2021). Hedges and boosters in undergraduate research recommendation letters (Publication No. 28415715) [Master’s thesis, Arizona State University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

44.

Samraj

(2021). Variation in interpersonal relations in manuscript reviews with different recommendations. English for Specific Purposes, 62, 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.12.003

45.

Schmader

Whitehead

Wysocki

(2007). A linguistic comparison of letters of recommendation for male and female chemistry and biochemistry job applicants. Sex Roles, 57(7-8), 509-514.

46.

Stedman

J. M.

Hatch

J. P.

Schoenfeld

L. S.

(2009). Letters of recommendation for the predoctoral internship in medical schools and other settings: Do they enhance decision making in the selection process? Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 16(4), 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-009-9170-y

47.

Swales

J. M.

(1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

48.

Swales

J. M.

(1996). Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter. In Ventola

Mauranen

(Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 45-58). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

49.

Swales

J. M.

(2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.

50.

Swales

J. M.

(2011). Aspects of article introductions. University of Michigan Press.

51.

Swales

J. M.

(2019). The futures of EAP genre studies: A personal viewpoint. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.003

52.

Swales

J. M.

Feak

C. B.

(2009). Abstracts and the writing of abstracts (Vol. 2). University of Michigan Press ELT.

53.

Tausczik

Pennebaker

(2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676

54.

Tomlinson

Newman

(2018). Epideictic rhetoric born digital: Evolution of the letter of recommendation genre. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(1), 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917729862

55.

Trix

Psenka

(2003). Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse and Society, 14(2), 191-220.

56.

Vergaro

(2005). “Dear Sirs, I hope you will find this information useful”: Discourse strategies in Italian and English “For Your Information” (FYI) letters. Discourse Studies, 7(1), 109-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605048769

57.

Vidali

(2009). Rhetorical hiccups: Disability disclosure in letters of recommendation. Rhetoric Review, 28(2), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350190902740042