A content analysis of U.S. digital news reveals that the visual coverage of criminal jury trials mainly focuses on defendants and law enforcement officials. The U.S. digital news still often use mugshots to portray Black/African American defendants, and law enforcement officials are significantly overrepresented as White and male. In partial contrast to past news coverage, Black/African American defendants are not depicted in handcuff at the crime scene or slovenly dressed more often than defendants from other ethnic groups.
AielloG.BardelliF.ChiariniS.FlaimG.BoasS.BrussaardE.ColombariJ.EstermannR.PiquerO.SchellingJ. (2016). Taking stock: Can news images be generic?. https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/TakingStock
2.
ArendtF. (2010). Cultivation effects of a newspaper on reality estimates and explicit and implicit attitudes. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 22(4), 147–159.
3.
ArenellaP. L. (1996). Televising high profile trials: Are we better off pulling the plug. Santa Clara Law Review, 37, 879.
4.
BarnettB. (2005). Perfect mother or artist of obscenity? Narrative and myth in a qualitative analysis of press coverage of the Andrea Yates murders. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 29(1), 9–29.
5.
BarryA. M. S. (1997). Visual intelligence: Perception, image, and manipulation in visual communication. SUNY Press.
6.
BeckettK.SassonT. (2003). The politics of injustice: Crime and punishment in America. SAGE.
7.
BissellK. L. (2000). A return to “Mr. Gates”: Photography and objectivity. Newspaper Research Journal, 21(3), 81–93.
8.
BjornstromE. E.KaufmanR. L.PetersonR. D.SlaterM. D. (2010). Race and ethnic representations of lawbreakers and victims in crime news: A national study of television coverage. Social Problems, 57(2), 269–293.
9.
BlumJ.BucherH. J. (1998). Die Zeitung: Ein Multimedium: Textdesign-ein Gestaltungskonzept für Text, Bild und Grafik. UVK-Medien.
10.
BockM. A. (2020). Theorizing visual framing: Contingency, materiality and ideology. Visual Studies, 35(1), 1–12.
11.
BrantnerC.LobingerK.WetzsteinI. (2011). Effects of visual framing on emotional responses and evaluations of news stories about the Gaza conflict 2009. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(3), 523–540.
12.
BrownW. J.DuaneJ. J.FraserB. P. (1997). Media coverage and public opinion of the OJ Simpson trial: Implications for the criminal justice system. Communication Law and Policy, 2(2), 261–287.
13.
BucherH. J.SchumacherP. (2006). The relevance of attention for selecting news content. An eye-tracking study on attention patterns in the reception of print and online media. Communications, 31(3), 347–368.
14.
ColemanR. (2010). Framing the pictures in our heads. Exploring the framing and agenda-setting effects of visual images. In D’AngeloP.KuypersJ. A. (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis (pp. 233–261). Routledge.
15.
DanV. (2018). Integrative framing analysis: Framing health through words and visuals (p. 182). Taylor & Francis.
16.
DixonT. L.LinzD. (2000). Race and the misrepresentation of victimization on local television news. Communication Research, 27(5), 547–573.
DukesK. N.GaitherS. E. (2017). Black racial stereotypes and victim blaming: Implications for media coverage and criminal proceedings in cases of police violence against racial and ethnic minorities. Journal of Social Issues, 73(4), 789–807.
19.
EntmanR. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
20.
EntmanR. M. (1994). Representation and reality in the portrayal of blacks on network television news. Journalism Quarterly, 71(3), 509–520.
21.
FoxR. L.Van SickelR. W.SteigerT. L. (2001). Tabloid justice: Criminal justice in an age of media frenzy (pp. 53–54). L. Rienner.
22.
GamsonW. A.ModiglianiA. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
23.
GerbnerG.GrossL.MorganM.SignorielliN.ShanahanJ. (1994). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In BryantJ.ZillmanD. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 43–68). Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
GerbnerG.GrossL. RMorganM.SignorelliN. (1980). The ‘mainstreaming’ of America: Violence profile no.11. Journal of Communication, 30, 10–27.
25.
GervaisT.MorelG. (2020). The making of visual news: A history of photography in the press. Bloomsbury.
26.
GibsonR.ZillmannD. (2000). Reading between the photographs: The influence of incidental pictorial information on issue perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(2), 355–366.
27.
GillespieL. K.RichardsT. N.GivensE. M.SmithM. D. (2013). Framing deadly domestic violence: Why the media’s spin matters in newspaper coverage of femicide. Violence against Women, 19(2), 222–245.
28.
GilliamF. D.Jr.IyengarS. (2000). Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 560–573.
29.
GitlinT. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media and the making and unmaking of the new left. University of California Press.
GulatiG. J. (2011). News frames and story triggers in the media’s coverage of human trafficking. Human Rights Review, 12(3), 363–379.
32.
HansV. P.DeeJ. L. (1991). Media coverage of law: Its impact on juries and the public. American Behavioral Scientist, 35(2), 136–149.
33.
HassonU.NirY.LevyI.FuhrmannG.MalachR. (2004). Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science, 303(5664), 1634–1640.
34.
HeathL.GilbertK. (1996). Mass media and fear of crime. American Behavioral Scientist, 39(4), 379–386.
35.
HellmuellerL.ZhangX. (2019). Shifting toward a humanized perspective? Visual framing analysis of the coverage of refugees on CNN and Spiegel Online before and after the iconic photo publication of Alan Kurdi. Visual Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357219832790
36.
JewkesY.LinnemannT. (2017). Media and crime in the US. SAGE.
37.
JungblutM.ZakareviciuteI. (2019). Do pictures tell a different story? A multimodal frame analysis of the 2014 Israel-Gaza conflict. Journalism Practice, 13(2), 206–228.
38.
KimY. S.KellyJ. D. (2008). A matter of culture: A comparative study of photojournalism in American and Korean newspapers. International Communication Gazette, 70(2), 155–173.
39.
KobréK. (2008). Photojournalism: The professionals’ approach. Routledge.
40.
Kort-ButlerL. A.HabeckerP. (2018). Framing and cultivating the story of crime: The effects of media use, victimization, and social networks on attitudes about crime. Criminal Justice Review, 43(2), 127–146.
41.
LoughK.AsheI. (2021). Journalism’s visual construction of place in environmental coverage. Newspaper Research Journal, 42(2), 253–269.
42.
MessarisP.AbrahamL. (2001). The role of images in framing news stories. In ReeseS.GandyO.GrantA. (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 215–226). Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
MonacoJ. (2000). How to read a film: The world of movies, media, multimedia: Language, history, theory (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
44.
OsbornK.DavisJ. P.ButtonS.FosterJ. (2021). Juror decision making in acquaintance and marital rape: The influence of clothing, alcohol, and preexisting stereotypical attitudes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), NP2675–NP2696.
45.
PaivioA. (1991). Images in mind. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
46.
PendryR. (2015). Reporter power: News organisations, duty of care and the use of locally-hired news gatherers in Syria. Ethical Space, 12(2), 4–13.
47.
RafieeA.SpoorenW.SandersJ. (2021). Framing similar issues differently: A cross-cultural discourse analysis of news images. Social Semiotics, 1–24.
48.
ReevesJ. L.CampbellR. (1994). Cracked coverage: Television news, the anti-cocaine crusade, and the Reagan legacy. Duke University Press.
49.
ReidJ. C.CraigM. O. (2021). Is it a rally or a riot? Racialized media framing of 2020 protests in the United States. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 19(3–4), 291–310.
50.
RocheS. P.PickettJ. T.GertzM. (2016). The scary world of online news? Internet news exposure and public attitudes toward crime and justice. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(2), 215–236.
51.
RodriguezL.DimitrovaD. V. (2011). The levels of visual framing. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 48–65.
52.
RoseG. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. SAGE.
53.
SchwalbeC. B. (2006). Remembering our shared past: Visually framing the Iraq war on US news websites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1), 264–289.
54.
ShanahanJ.MorganM. (1999). Television and its viewers: Cultivation theory and research. Cambridge University Press.
55.
ShrumL. J. (1996). Psychological processes underlying cultivation effects further tests of construct accessibility. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 482–509.
56.
ShrumL. J. (2017). Cultivation theory: Effects and underlying processes. The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects, 1–12.
57.
ShrumL. J.O’GuinnT. C. (1993). Processes and effects in the construction of social reality: Construct accessibility as an explanatory variable. Communication Research, 20(3), 436–471.
58.
SmileyC.FakunleD. (2016). From “brute” to “thug”: The demonization and criminalization of unarmed Black male victims in America. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 26(3–4), 350–366.
59.
StoneM.OvertonA.McDadeC.SmithK.Monk-TurnerE. (2014). Rush-hour traffic: Self-presentation of defendants in speedy traffic court cases. Criminal Justice Studies, 27(4), 439–456.
60.
SuretteR. (2011). Mass media, crime and justice (RosenfeldR., Ed.). Oxford University Press.
61.
VergeerM.LubbersM.ScheepersP. (2000). Exposure to newspapers and attitudes toward ethnic minorities: A longitudinal analysis. Howard Journal of Communications, 11(2), 127–143.
62.
WardleC. (2007). Monsters and angels: Visual press coverage of child murders in the USA and UK, 1930—2000. Journalism, 8(3), 263–284.
WheelerM. (2008). How noninstitutionalized media change the relationship between the public and media coverage of trials. Law and Contemporary Problems, 71(4), 135–153.
