Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

By focusing on the 2015 Syrian refugee crisis compared to the 2022 refugee crisis from Ukraine, this study examined how Western media visually portrayed Middle Eastern versus European refugees on social media. Drawing on the current literature and guided by visual framing theory, a total of 1,590 visual tweets of forcibly displaced Middle Easterners and Europeans were analyzed. Results suggest differences in the denotative, stylistic, and connotative representations between the two groups. Significant differences emerged across variables, including scene, facial expressions, camera shot, and the dominant frame. Overall, our investigation into this area expands the comparative visual literature on social media portrayal of crises and exposes discrepancies in pictorial representations of refugees in Western media based on geographical and temporal contexts.

Keywords

visual communication framing representation journalism international visual communication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdelhady

Delioglu

(2022). Human interest stories in the coverage of Syrian refugees: A case study from Turkey. Mashriq & Mahjar: Journal of Middle East and North African Migration Studies, 9(1), 93–120. https://doi.org/10.24847/v9i12022.310

Abid

R. Z.

Manan

S. A.

Rahman

Z. A. A. A.

(2017). ‘A flood of Syrians has slowed to a trickle’: The use of metaphors in the representation of Syrian refugees in the online media news reports of host and non-host countries. Discourse & Communication, 11(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317691857

Aldamen

(2023). Xenophobia and hate speech towards refugees on social media: Reinforcing causes, negative effects, defense and response mechanisms against that speech. Societies, 13(4), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13040083

Amores

J. J.

Calderón

C. A.

Stanek

(2019). Visual frames of migrants and refugees in the main Western European media. Economics & Sociology, 12(3), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-3/10

Åslund

(2022). How can Europe handle the Ukrainian refugee challenge. In CESifo Forum (Vol. 4, No. 23, pp. 3–7).

Barry

(2018). Art and materiality in the global refugee crisis: Ai Weiwei’s artworks and the emerging aesthetics of mobilities. Mobilities, 14(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2018.1533683

Bellander

(2022). Fleeing as an activity of waiting: Visual representations of the world’s refugee situation on Médecins Sans Frontière Sweden’s website. Journal of Refugee Studies, 35(1), 310–330. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feab048

Berger

A. A.

(1991). Media research techniques. Sage Publications.

Bleiker

Campbell

Hutchison

Nicholson

(2013). The visual dehumanisation of refugees. Australian Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2013.840769

10.

Chouliaraki

(2008). The symbolic power of transnational media: Managing the visibility of suffering. Global Media and Communication, 4(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766508096084

11.

Elhosary

(2024). Vulnerability or resilience tweets? A comparative analysis of media outlets versus non-governmental organizations visual representations of the 2023 Morocco earthquake survivors. International Communication Gazette, 87(3), 238–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485241267710

12.

Elmasry

(2024). Images of the Israel–Gaza war on Instagram: A content analysis of Western broadcast news posts. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241287155

13.

Entman

(1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

14.

Fahmy

(2004). Picturing Afghan women: A content analysis of AP wire photographs during the Taliban regime and after the fall of the Taliban regime. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands), 66(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549204041472

15.

Fahmy

Bock

Wanta

(2014). Visual communication theory and research: A mass communication perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.

16.

Fahmy

Neumann

(2011). Shooting war or peace photographs? An examination of newswires’ coverage of the conflict in Gaza (2008-2009). The American Behavioral Scientist, 56(2), NP1–NP26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211419355

17.

Fuchs

(2018). Propaganda 2.0: Herman and Chomsky's propaganda model in the age of the internet, big data and social media. In Propaganda model today: Filtering perception and awareness: Filtering perception and awareness (pp. 71–91). University of Westminster Press.

18.

Galtung

(1971). A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 8(2), 81–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234337100800201

19.

Geise

(2024). Effects of visual framing in multimodal media environments: A systematic review of studies between 1979 and 2023. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241257586

20.

Georgiou

Zaborowski

(2017). Media coverage of the “refugee crisis”: A cross-European perspective. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/1680706b00

21.

Ghorashi

(2005). Agents of change or passive victims: The impact of welfare states (the case of The Netherlands) on refugees. Journal of Refugee Studies, 18(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/refuge/fei020

22.

Gibson

Zillmann

(1993). The impact of quotation in news reports on issue perception. Journalism Quarterly, 70(4), 793–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000405

23.

Gilbert

(2013). The discursive production of a Mexican refugee crisis in Canadian media and policy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(5), 827–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.756693

24.

Gillespie

(2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.

25.

Gorman

C. S.

Culcasi

(2021). Invasion and colonization: Islamophobia and anti-refugee sentiment in West Virginia. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39(1), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420943897

26.

Gorp

B. V.

(2005). Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 484–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058253

27.

Greussing

Boomgaarden

H. G.

(2017). Shifting the refugee narrative? An automated frame analysis of Europe's 2015 refugee crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(11), 1749–1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1282813

28.

Guidry

J. P. D.

Austin

L. L.

Carlyle

K. E.

Freberg

Cacciatore

Meganck

Jin

Messner

(2018). Welcome or not: Comparing #Refugee posts on Instagram and Pinterest. The American Behavioral Scientist, 62(4), 512–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218760369

29.

Hamada

B. I.

(2001). The Arab image in the minds of Western image-makers. The Journal of International Communication, 7(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2001.9751897

30.

Heinkelmann-Wild

Beck

Spencer

(2019). Heroes welcome: An exceptional story of ‘good’ refugees in the German tabloid discourse. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 14(3), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2019.1649412

31.

Hellmueller

Zhang

(2019). Shifting toward a humanized perspective? Visual framing analysis of the coverage of refugees on CNN and Spiegel online before and after the iconic photo publication of Alan Kurdi. Visual Communication, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357219832790

32.

Herman

E. S.

Chomsky

(2011). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media (1st Anniversary ed.). Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

33.

Huntington

S. P.

(2000). The clash of civilizations? In Crothers

Lockhart

(Eds.), Culture and politics (pp. 1–456). Palgrave Macmillan.

34.

Hussain

Wieffering

(2021). Heartbreaking vs. Heartwarming Facebook advertisements by nonprofits to help the Rohingya refugees. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 41(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2021.1903163

35.

Irom

Borah

Vishnevskaya

Gibbons

(2022). News framing of the Rohingya crisis: Content analysis of newspaper coverage from four countries. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 20(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2021.1906472

36.

Kalogeropoulos

Fletcher

Nielsen

R. K.

(2019). News brand attribution in distributed environments: Do people know where they get their news? New Media & Society, 21(3), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818801313

37.

Kentmen-Cin

(2024). Attitudes towards Ukrainian refugees: Insights from the literature. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 38(1), 112–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2430231

38.

Kietzmann

J. H.

Hermkens

McCarthy

I. P.

Silvestre

B. S.

(2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005

39.

Kotilainen

Pellander

(2021). (Not) looking like a refugee: Symbolic borders of habitus in media representations of refugees. Media History, 28(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2021.1932445

40.

Kreis

(2017). #Refugeesnotwelcome: Anti-refugee discourse on Twitter. Discourse & Communication, 11(5), 498–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317714121

41.

Lee

S. Y.

Lim

J. R.

Shi

(2024). Visually framing disasters: Humanitarian aid organizations’ use of visuals on social media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 101(3), 749–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221081046

42.

Louis

W. R.

Duck

J. M.

Terry

D. J.

Schuller

R. A.

Lalonde

R. N.

(2007). Why do citizens want to keep refugees out? Threats, fairness and hostile norms in the treatment of asylum seekers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.329

43.

Mao

(2017). Intercoder reliability. In The Sage encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 553–554). Sage Publications.

44.

Matamoros-Fernández

Farkas

(2021). Racism, hate speech, and social media: A systematic review and critique. Television & New Media, 22(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982230

45.

Maurer

Jost

Hassler

Kruschinski

(2021). Auf den spuren der lugenpresse; zur richtigkeit und ausgewogenheit der medienberichterstattung in der “fluchtlingskrise”. Publizistik, 64(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-018-00466-y

46.

McCombs

M. E.

Shaw

D. L.

(1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

47.

Mustafa

Pilus

Mohammad Lotfie

(2021). The representation of Syrian refugees in Canadian online news media: A focus on the topos of burdening. Canadian Journal of Communication, 46(4), 875–903. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2021v46n4a3807

48.

Nakade

Musaev

Atkison

(2018, March). Preliminary research on thesaurus-based query expansion for Twitter data extraction. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Southeast conference (pp. 1–4). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

49.

Neuman

Guggenheim

Mo Jang

Bae

S. Y.

(2014). The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088

50.

Nikolic-Ristanovic

(2003). Refugee women in Serbia. Invisible victims of war in the former Yugoslavia. Feminist Review, 73(73), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400078

51.

Ocha

R. W.

(2022, February). Ukraine – Humanitarian response plan 2022 (February 2022) [EN/UK]-Ukraine. ReliefWeb, https://reliefweb.int/report/ukraine/ukraine-humanitarian-response-plan-2022-february-2022-enuk

52.

Pantti

(2013). Seeing and not seeing the Syrian crisis: New visibility and the visual framing of the Syrian conflict in seven newspapers and their online editions. JOMEC Journal, 4, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18573/j.2013.10259

53.

Parrott

Hoewe

Fan

Huffman

(2019). Portrayals of immigrants and refugees in U.S. news media: Visual framing and its effect on emotions and attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(4), 677–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1681860

54.

Pond

(2016). The space between us: Twitter and crisis communication. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 7(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-08-2013-0030

55.

Rachel Henzell

Margaret Knight

Morgaine

K. C.

Antoun

J. S.

Farella

(2014). A qualitative analysis of orthodontic-related posts on Twitter. The Angle Orthodontist, 84(2), 203–207. https://doi.org/10.2319/051013-355.1

56.

Rettberg

J. W.

Gajjala

(2016). Terrorists or cowards: Negative portrayals of male Syrian refugees in social media. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 178–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1120493

57.

Rodriguez

Dimitrova

D. V.

(2011). The levels of visual framing. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2011.11674684

58.

Sales

(2023). The refugee crisis’ double standards: Media framing and the proliferation of positive and negative narratives during the Ukrainian and Syrian crises. Euromesco Policy Brief, 129, 1–12.

59.

Scheufele

D. A.

(1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x

60.

Scott

W. A.

(1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/266577

61.

Seita

Al-Jadba

(2023). Gaza is facing a humanitarian catastrophe. The Lancet, 402(10414), 1745. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02401-7

62.

Sen

(2014). The myths refugees live by: Memory and history in the making of Bengali refugee identity. Modern Asian Studies, 48(1), 37–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X12000613

63.

Sharevski

Alsaadi

Jachim

Pieroni

(2022). Misinformation warnings: Twitter’s soft moderation effects on COVID-19 vaccine belief echoes. Computers & Security, 114, 102577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102577

64.

Spence

P. R.

Lachlan

K. A.

Lin

del Greco

(2015). Variability in Twitter content across the stages of a natural disaster: Implications for crisis communication. Communication Quarterly, 63(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1012219

65.

Tiryakian

J. C.

(1985). The conquest of America. The question of the other. By Tzvetan Todorov. Translated from the French by Richard Howard. (New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1984. pp. 274. $17.95.). The Americas (Washington. 1944), 41(4), 520–522. https://doi.org/10.2307/1007356

66.

TRT World. (2022a, March 5). Is coverage of Russia’s attack on Ukraine biased? [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBKKtN1b-i0

67.

TRT World. (2022b, March 1). Double Standards on Conflict and Refugees? [Video]. YouTtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIpyT0xS4Kw&t=35s

68.

UNHCR. (2015). UNHCR Global Trends 2015. UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/us/media/unhcr-global-trends-2015

69.

UNHCR. (2022, July). Protection of internally displaced persons in Georgia: A gap. UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/4ad827f59.pdf

70.

UNHCR. (n.d.). Refugee convention and 1967 protocol relating to the status of refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/media/1951-refugee-convention-and-1967-protocol-relating-status-refugees

71.

Van Leeuwen

(2001). Semiotics and iconography. Handbook of visual analysis, 92-118.

72.

Wilmott

A. C.

(2017). The politics of photography: Visual depictions of Syrian refugees in U.K. online media. Visual Communication Quarterly, 24(2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2017.1307113

73.

Wion. (2022, February 18). Gravitas: Western media's racist reportage on Ukrainian refugees [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBRwmTVVKQk

74.

World Bank Group. (2022, April 12). Russian invasion to shrink Ukraine economy by 45 percent this year. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/04/10/russian-invasion-to-shrink-ukraine-economy-by-45-percent-this-year

75.

Wright

Brinklow-Vaughn

Johannes

Rodriguez

(2020). Media portrayals of immigration and refugees in hard and fake news and their impact on consumer attitudes. Howard Journal of Communications, 32(4), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2020.1810180

76.

Zhang

(2023). How news media visually dehumanize victims of humanitarian crises through framing disparities: A quantitative comparative analysis. International Communication Gazette, 86(8), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485231216583

77.

Zhang

(2005). US Newspaper coverage of immigration in 2004: A content analysis [PhD Thesis]. Texas A&M University. https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/2464/etd-tamu-2005A-STJR-Zhang.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

78.

Zhang

Hellmueller

(2017). Visual framing of the European refugee crisis in Der Spiegel and CNN International: Global journalism in news photographs. International Communication Gazette, 79(5), 483–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048516688134

79.

Zunes

(2017). Europe’s refugee crisis, terrorism, and islamophobia. Peace Review, 29(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2017.1272275

Picturing Refugees in Western Media: A Comparative Study of Middle Eastern and European Refugees on Twitter

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References