This analysis sheds light on planning education in Mexico. One important question that the paper addresses is: Are planning programs forming professionals capable of addressing the challenges that cities and regions face in the twenty-first century? The study draws upon a content analysis of 253 course syllabi and a database of 128 employed local planners. The results of the analysis suggest that planning curricula are still very much embedded in the rational model and there is a challenge for strengthening the curricula with more communicative skills that are valuable in a postmodern society.
AguilarLuis F.2006. Gobernanza y gestión pública [Governance and Public Management]. Mexico City: Fondo de cultura Económica.
2.
AltermanRachelle. 1992. “A Transatlantic View of Planning Education and Professional Practice.” Journal of Planning Education and Research12 (1): 39–54.
3.
AltermanRachelle. 2017a. “From a Minor to a Major Profession: Can Planning and Planning Theory Meet the Challenges of Globalisation?” Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning1 (1): 1–17.
4.
AltermanRachelle. 2017b. “Planners’ Beacon, Compass and Scale.” In Encounters in Planning Thought: 16 Autobiographical Essays from Key Thinkers in Spatial Planning, edited by HaselsbergerBeatrix, 260–79. New York: Routledge.
5.
Álvarez EnríquezLucia. 2016. “Ciudad y ciudadanía: una reflexión conceptual [City and Citizenship: A Conceptual Reflection].” In Los Desafíos de la Ciudad del Siglo XXI, edited by Alvarez-EnriquezLuciaRamosGian Carlo DelgadoMartínezAlejandra Leal, 493–516. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
6.
ArgyrisChrisSchönDonald. 1974. Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BlancoHilda. 1994. How to Think about Social Problems: American Pragmatism and the Idea of Planning. Westport: Greenwood Press.
8.
Cabrero MendozaEnrique. 2012. Acción pública y desarrollo local [Public Action and Local Development]. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
9.
Cabrero MendozaEnriqueGaultDavid Arellano. 1993. “Análisis de innovaciones exitosas en organizaciones públicas. Una propuesta metodológica [Analysis of Successful Innovations on Public Organizations: A Methodological Proposal].” Gestión y política públicaII (1): 59–86.
10.
CaroliniGabriella Y.2018. “Go South, Young Planner, Go South!” Journal of Planning Education and Research. Published electronically February 3. doi:10.1177/0739456X18754317.
11.
DaltonLinda C.2001. “Weaving the Fabric of Planning as Education.” Journal of Planning Education and Research20 (4): 423–36.
ForesterJohn. 1988. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
FrankAndrea I.2006. “Three Decades of though in Planning Education.” Journal of Planning Literature21 (1): 15–67.
15.
FriedmannJohn. 1996. “The Core Curricula in Planning Revisited.” Journal of Planning Education and Research15 (2): 89–104.
16.
FriedmannJohn. 2005. “Globalization and the Emerging Culture of Planning.” Progress in Planning64 (3): 183–234.
17.
GarzaGustavo. 1989. Una década de planeación urbano-regional en México, 1978–1988 [A Decade of Urban and Regional Planning in Mexico, 1978–1988]. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.
18.
GarzaGustavo. 2003. La urbanización de México en el siglo XX [Mexico’s Urbanization in the XX Century]. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.
19.
GascaJosé. 2009. La región, la regionalización y el desarrollo regional de México [Region, Regionalizing and Regional Development in Mexico]. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
20.
GrahamStephenHealeyPatsy. 1999. “Relational Concepts of Space and Place: Issues for Planning Theory and Practice.” European Planning Studies7 (5): 623–46.
HealeyPatsy. 2004. “Creativity and Urban Governance.” Policy Studies25 (2): 87–102.
23.
HemmensGeorge C.1988. “Thirty Years of Planning Education.” Journal of Planning and Education Research7 (2): 85–91.
24.
InnesJudith E.BooherDavid E.2010. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
25.
KochanDror. 2018. “The Prospects and Challenges of Socially Engaged Urban Planning and Architecture in Contemporary China.” Journal of Planning Education and Research. Published electronically September 2. doi:10.1177/0739456X18796635.
26.
KunzmannKlaus R.YuanLiu. 2014. “Educating Planners from China in Europe.” disP: The Planning Review50 (4): 66–70.
27.
NeumanMichael. 2018. “The Collaborative Interdisciplinary Studio.” In Urban Planning Education: Beginnings, Global Movements and Future Prospects, edited by FrankAndrea I.SilverChristopher, 269–92. Tartu: Springer.
28.
PerloffHarvey S.1957. Education for Planning: City, State, & Regional. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.
RodríguezVictoria. 2018. Decentralization in Mexico: From reforma municipal to solidaridad to nuevo federalismo. New York: Routledge.
32.
SchönDonald A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
33.
SilverChirstopher. 2018. “The Origins of Planning Education: Overview.” In Urban Planning Education: Beginnings, Global Movements and Future Prospects, edited by FrankAndrea I.SilverChristopher, 11–25. Tartu: Springer.
34.
StanilovKiril. 2007. The Post-socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism. Dordrecht: Springer.
35.
TamayoSergio. 2016. “Critica de la ciudadanía en la ciudad del libre mercado.” In Los Desafíos de la Ciudad del Siglo XXI, edited by Alvarez-EnriquezLuciaRamosGian Carlo DelgadoMartínezy Alejandra Leal, 517–35. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
36.
TodaroMichael P.1992. Economics for a Developing World: An Introduction to Principles, Problems and Policies for Development. London: Longman.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
