Little is known about the factors influencing the skills that planners utilize in practice. This study draws upon national survey data to identify the factors influencing skill acquisition and use, paying particular attention to the role of graduate planning education. The results of the analysis suggest that those holding a Planning Accreditation Board–accredited planning degree utilize a larger number of skills in practice, particularly skills pertaining to the core domains of planning knowledge. These findings suggest that PAB accreditation plays an important role in shaping the types of planners sought by employers.
FoxRichard L.SchuhmannRobert A.1999. “Gender and Local Government: A Comparison of Women and Men City Managers.” Public Administration Review59 (3): 231–42.
11.
GreenleeAndrew J.EdwardsMaryAnthonyJerry. 2015. “Planning skills: An Examination of Supply and Local Government Demand.” Journal of Planning Education and Research35 (2): 161–73.
12.
GuzzettaJacqueline D.BollensScott A.2003. “Urban Planners’ Skills and Competencies: Are We Different from Other Professions? Does Context Matter? Do We Evolve?”Journal of Planning Education and Research23:96–106.
13.
HochCharles. 2010. “Does Planning School Payoff for Planning Practitioners?”Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Conference. Minneapolis, MN, October 7.
14.
HoldenMeg. 2012. “Is Integrated Planning Any More Than the Sum of Its Parts? Considerations for Planning Sustainable Cities.” Journal of Planning Education and Research32 (3): 305–18.
15.
InnesJudith E.1996. “Planning through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal.” Journal of the American Planning Association62 (4): 460–72.
16.
IssermanAndrew M.1975. “Quantitative Methods Courses in Graduate Programs of Urban and Regional Planning.” Bulletin of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning13 (3): 8–11.
17.
IssermanAndrew M.1977. “Planning Practice and Planning Education: The Case of Quantitative Methods.” Bulletin of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning15 (1): 1–7.
18.
KaufmanSandaSimonsRobert. 1995. “Quantitative and Research Methods in Planning: Are Schools Teaching What Practitioners Practice?”Journal of Planning Education and Research15 (1): 17–33.
19.
KruekebergD. A.1978. “Practical Demands for Analytical Methods.” In Planning Theory in the 1980s, edited by BurchettR. W.SternliebG., 309–40. Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
20.
MyersDowellBanerjeeTridib. 2005. “Toward Greater Heights for Planning: Reconciling the Differences between Profession, Practice, and Academic Field.” Journal of the American Planning Association71 (2): 121–29.
21.
MeckStuart. 1998. “Certification, Licensing, and Registration of Planners.” Land Use Law, August, 3–9.
22.
OzawaConnie P.SeltzerEthan P.1999. “Taking Our Bearings: Mapping a Relationship among Planning Practice, Theory, and Education.” Journal of Planning Education and Research18: 257–66.
23.
OzawaConnieSeltzerEthanIroz-ElardoNicole. 2010. “On the Job: Expectations, Experience and Planning Education.” Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Conference. Minneapolis, MN, October 7.
24.
PattonCarlSawickiDavidClarkJennifer. 2012. Basic Methods of Policy Analysis and Planning, 3rd ed.New York: Pearson.
PerloffHarvey. 1957. Education for Planning: City, State and Regional. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
SeltzerEthanOzawaConnie P.2002. “Clear Signals: Moving on to Planning’s Promise.” Journal of Planning Education and Research22:77–86.
28.
StewartDebra W.1990. “Women in Public Administration.” In Public Administration: The State of the Discipline, edited by LynnNaomie B.WildavskyAaron. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
29.
StiftelBruce. 2009. “Planning the Paths of Planning Schools.” Australian Planner46 (1): 38–47.
30.
StiftelBruceRukmanaDedenAlamBhuiyan. 2004. “A National Research Council-Style Study.” Journal of Planning Education and Research24:6–22.
