We examine the core curricula of the master’s degree programs of thirty planning schools in the United States and Canada and discuss patterns in core requirements. We compare current planning core curricula to those described more than fifteen years ago by John Friedmann and explore several questions surrounding core curricula, planning practice, and the demands of academic legitimacy. The article concludes with a brief case study highlighting the implementation of a new core curriculum at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Alexander, Ernest R.2001. What do planners need to know? Journal of Planning Education and Research20 (3): 376-80.
2.
Baum, Howell S.1997. Social science, social work, and surgery: Teaching what students need to practice planning. Journal of the American Planning Association63 (2): 179-88.
3.
Brooks, Michael.2002. Planning theory for practitioners. Chicago, IL: Planners Press.
4.
Campbell, Scott, and Susan Fainstein, eds. 2003. Readings in planning theory. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA : Blackwell.
5.
Carter, Emanuel J., Jr.1993. Toward a core body of knowledge: A new curriculum for city and regional planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research12 (2): 160-63.
6.
Dalton, Linda C.2001. Weaving the fabric of planning as education. Journal of Planning Education and Research20 (4): 423-36.
7.
Dalton, Linda C.2007. Preparing planners for the breadth of practice: What we need to know depends on whom we ask. Journal of the American Planning Association73 (1): 35-48.
8.
Davidson, J. Mark.1986. Quantitative reasoning in the planning curriculum. Journal of Planning Education and Research6 (1): 30-36.
9.
Feldman, Marshall M. A.1994. Perloff revisited: Reassessing planning education in postmodern times. Journal of Planning Education and Research13 (2): 89-103.
10.
Friedmann, John.1987. Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Friedmann, John.1996. The core curriculum in planning revisited. Journal of Planning Education and Research15 (2): 89-104.
12.
Guzzetta, Jacqueline D., and Scott A. Bollens .2003. Urban planners’ skills and competencies: Are we different from other professions? Does context matter? Do we evolve?Journal of Planning Education and Research23 (1): 96-106.
13.
Hall, Peter.2002. Cities of tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
14.
Heikkila, Eric J.2000. The economics of planning. Rutgers : State University of New Jersey.
15.
Helling, Amy, and David Sawicki.1997. The central sixth theme: Linking knowledge and collective action. Journal of Planning Education and Research16 (3): 228.
16.
Hoch, Charles.1994. What planners do: Power, politics and persuasion. Chicago: Planners Press.
Hopkins, Lewis.2001. Urban development: The logic of making plans. Washington, DC: Island Press.
19.
Hopkins, Lewis D., and Marisa A. Zapata .2007. Engaging the future: Forecasts, scenarios, plans, and projects. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
20.
Howland, M.1997. Comments from a survivor. Journal of Planning Education and Research16 (3): 225-26.
21.
Innes, Judith.1997. The planner’s century. Journal of Planning Education and Research16 (3): 227-28.
22.
Jacobs, Jane.1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
23.
Kaufman, Sanda, and Robert Simons.1995. Quantitative and research methods in planning: Are schools teaching what practitioners practice? Journal of Planning Education and Research15 (1): 17-33.
24.
Myers, Dowell.1997. Anchor points for planning’s identification. Journal of Planning, Education and Research16 (3): 223-24.
25.
Myers, Dowell, and T. Banerjee.2005. Toward greater heights for planning: Reconciling the differences between profession, practice and academic field . Journal of the American Planning Association71 (2): 121-29.
26.
Niebanck, R.1997. Notes on planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research16 (3): 225.
27.
Neuman, Michael.1998. Does planning need the plan? Journal of the American Planning Association64 (2): 208-220.
28.
Orlick, S.C.1993. Justifying the value of formal planning education. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design20: 499-510.
29.
Patton, Carl V., and David Sawicki.1993. Basic methods of policy analysis and planning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
Perloff, Harvey.1957. Education for planning: City, state and regional. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
Planetizen guide to graduate urban planning programs. 2006-2007 . Los Angeles, CA: Planetizen Press .
32.
Planning Accreditation Board (PAB).2006. The accreditation document: Criteria and procedures of the planning accreditation program. Chicago, IL: PAB.
33.
Rittel, Horst, and Melvin Webber.1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning . Policy Sciences4:155-69.
34.
Seltzer, Ethan, and Connie P. Ozawa .2002. Clear signals: Moving on to planning’s promise. Journal of Planning Education and Research22 (1): 77-86.
35.
Schon, Donald.1987. Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Tufte, Edward.2001. The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Edward R. Tufte.
