This study investigated how a technology-enhanced board game, the Chinese Character Component Monster (3CM) system, grounded in the recognition–handwriting separation (RHS) approach, supports young learners’ Chinese literacy development. The 3CM system integrates tangible gameplay and lightweight digital features such as speech recognition and augmented reality etymology videos to enhance component recognition, orthographic awareness, and motivation. A quasi-experimental design involving 58 second-grade students and two teachers compared 3CM with a text-only board game over three weeks. Quantitative data were analyzed using ANCOVA and t-tests, while qualitative data from post-intervention focus group interviews underwent thematic analysis. Results showed that students using 3CM significantly outperformed the control group in component recognition and orthographic awareness, and reported higher value, confidence, and interest in learning. These findings demonstrate the pedagogical potential of low-tech, multimodal, and gamified literacy tools that effectively integrate cognitive, motivational, and interactive learning principles for early Chinese character instruction.
AndersonR. C.LiW.KuY. M.ShuH.WuN. (2003). Use of partial information in learning to read Chinese characters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.52
CaiM.XianL. (2025). The effect of executive function on word recognition: Comparison between native Chinese and learners with Chinese as a second language (CSL). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 54(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-024-10120-6
4.
ChanT. S. P.LohE. K. Y.HungC. O. Y. (2023). A longitudinal study of Chinese as a second language kindergarteners’ orthographic awareness and its association with lexical learning performance. Current Psychology, 42(6), 4543–4555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01797-2
5.
ChangL.TangY.LeeC.ChenH. (2022). The effect of visual mnemonics and the presentation of character pairs on learning visually similar characters for Chinese-as-second-language learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 783898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.783898
6.
ChenZ.-H.ChenH. H.-J.DaiW.-J. (2018). Using narrative-based contextual games to enhance language learning: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 186–198. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458517
7.
DingG.PengD.TaftM. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 530–539. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.530
8.
FernandesF. A.RodriguesC. S. C.TeixeiraE. N.WernerC. M. L. (2023). Immersive learning frameworks: A systematic literature review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(5), 736–747. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2023.3242553
HuangR.RitzhauptA. D.SommerM.ZhuJ.StephenA.ValleN.HamptonJ.LiJ. (2020). The impact of gamification in educational settings on student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(4), 1875–1901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09807-z
11.
HungH. C.YoungS. C. (2015). An investigation of game-embedded handheld devices to enhance English learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(4), 548–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115571922
12.
HwangG. J.WangS. Y. (2016). Single loop or double loop learning: English vocabulary learning performance and behavior of students in situated computer games with different guiding strategies. Computers & Education, 102, 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.005
13.
Johnson-GlenbergM. C. (2018). Immersive VR and education: Embodied design principles that include gesture and hand controls. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 81. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00081
14.
KellerJ. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780
15.
LanY.-J.FangS.-Y.LegaultJ.LiP. (2015). Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese vocabulary: Context of learning effects. Educational Technology Research & Development, 63(5), 671–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9380-y
16.
LeanJ.IllingworthS.WakeP. (2018). Unhappy families: Using tabletop games as a technology to understand play in education. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 2027. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2027
17.
LiM. (2020). A systematic review of the research on Chinese character teaching and learning. Frontiers of Education in China, 15(1), 39–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-020-0003-y
18.
LiaoX.LohE. K. Y.CaiM. (2022). Lexical orthographic knowledge mediates the relationship between character reading and reading comprehension among learners with Chinese as a second language. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 779905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779905
19.
LinZ.-X.WangH.-P. (2019). Effectiveness of applying a character-based teaching method to improve the proficiency of primary Chinese as a second language. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).000
20.
LoorbachN.PetersO.KarremanJ.SteehouderM. (2015). Validation of the instructional materials motivation survey (IMMS) in a self-directed instructional setting aimed at working with technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12138
21.
McBrideC.PanD. J.MohseniF. (2021). Reading and writing words: A cross-linguistic perspective. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25(5), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2021.1920595
22.
McNeishD.StapletonL. M. (2016). The effect of small sample size on two-level model estimates: A review and illustration. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9287-x
23.
OlmansonJ.LiuX.HeseltonC. C.SrivastavaA.WangN. (2021). Chinese character recognition and literacy development via a techno-pedagogical pivot. Educational Technology Research & Development, 69(6), 1299–1324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09976-5
24.
PerfettiC. A.LiuY.TanL. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.43
25.
RuanY.MaurerU.McBrideC. (2024). Effectiveness of reading interventions on literacy skills for Chinese children with and without dyslexia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Educational Psychology Review, 36(3), 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09915-9
26.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness.The Guilford Press.
27.
SchraderC.KalyugaS. (2023). Expertise reversal effect in a pen-tablet-based learning environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12547
28.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference.Houghton Mifflin.
ShuH.AndersonR. C. (1997). Role of radical awareness in the character and word acquisition of Chinese children. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.32.1.5
32.
ShuH.ChenX.AndersonR. C.WuN.XuanY. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00519
33.
SwellerJ. (2023). Discussion of the special issue on cognitive load theory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(S2), 402–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12606
TanL. H.SpinksJ. A.EdenG. F.PerfettiC. A.SiokW. T. (2005). Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(24), 8781–8785. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503523102
36.
UrhahneD.WijniaL. (2023). Theories of motivation in education: An integrative framework. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 1397–1431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9
37.
WangC.LiuW.KeeY.ChianL. (2019). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness in the classroom: Understanding students’ motivational processes using the self-determination theory. Heliyon, 5(7), e01983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01983
38.
WangY.YinL.McBrideC. (2015). Unique predictors of early reading and writing: A one-year longitudinal study of Chinese kindergarteners. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.02.004
39.
WenY. (2018). Chinese character composition game with the augment paper. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 132–145. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458513
40.
WongV. (2017). The language medium policies: A study on the development of independent Chinese secondary schools (ICSS) in Malaysia. KATHA- The Official Journal of the Centre for Civilisational Dialogue, 13(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.22452/KATHA.vol13no1.2
41.
ZangX.WongY. K.LauK. (2025). Predictors of Chinese reading in Chinese monolingual and Chinese–English bilingual children in Mainland China. Reading and Writing, 38(4), 1153–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10552-5
42.
ZhangL.XingH. (2023). The interaction of orthography, phonology and semantics in the process of second language learners’ Chinese character production. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1076810. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1076810
43.
ZouD.HuangY.XieH. (2021). Digital game-based vocabulary learning: Where are we and where are we going?Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5-6), 751–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1640745
