The Impact of Interactive Environment and Metacognitive Support on Academic Achievement and Transactional Distance in Online Learning

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to reveal the impact of the interactive environment and metacognitive support (MS) in online learning on academic achievement and transactional distance (TD). The study is designed as 2 × 2 factorial design, and both qualitative and quantitative research techniques are used. The study was carried out on 127 students, and this research design was implemented in an online learning environment and evaluated based on an achievement test, TD scale, and semistructured interviews. The results of the study revealed that synschronous environments had a significant impact in reducing TD perception. In asynschronous environments, on the other hand, providing students with MS was efficient in reducing TD. In terms of academic success, compared with synschronous environments, MS provided in asynschronous environments caused to a significant difference in achievement test scores of the students. Explanations about findings and implications for instructional design are discussed in Conclusion section.

Keywords

learning environments metacognitive support academic achievement transactional distance online learning interactivity self-regulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akyol

Garrison

D. R.

(2011) Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education 14(3): 183–190.

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson College Survey Research Group. Retrieved 20 May 2012, from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/class-differences.pdf.

Artino

A. R.

(2009) Think, feel, act: Motivational and emotional influences on military students’ online academic success. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 21(2): 146–166.

Aydin

(2012) A review of research on Facebook as an educational environment. Educational Technology Research and Development 60(6): 1093–1106.

Baker

Brown

A. L.

(1984) Metacognitive skills and reading. Handbook of Reading Research 1: 353–394.

Bannert

Mengelkamp

(2013) Scaffolding hypermedia learning through metacognitive prompts. In: Azevdo

Aleven

(eds) International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 171–186.

Benson

Samarawickrema

(2009) Addressing the context of e-learning: Using transactional distance theory to inform design. Distance Education 30(1): 5–21.

Bernard

R. M.

Abrami

P. C.

Borokhovski

Wade

C. A.

Tamim

R. M.

Surkes

M. A.

Bethel

E. C.

(2009) A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research 79(3): 1243–1289.

Bernard

R. M.

Abrami

P. C.

Lou

Borokhovski

Wade

Wozney

Huang

(2004) How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research 74: 379–439.

10.

Blakey, E., & Spence, S. (1990). Developing metacognition. ERIC digest. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED327218).

11.

Broadbent

Poon

W. L.

(2015) Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education 27: 1–13.

12.

Brown

A. L.

(1987) Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In: Weinert

F. E.

Kluwe

R. H.

(eds) Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (65–116), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

13.

Chen

Wang

Chen

N. S.

(2014) Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education 79: 16–27.

14.

Cigdem

(2015) How does self-regulation affect computer-programming achievement in a blended context? Contemporary Educational Technology 6(1): 19–37.

15.

Clouse, S. (2001). The assessment of student performance and satisfaction outcomes with synchronous and asynchronous ınteraction methods in student-centered distributed learning environment (Doctoral dissertation). University of Montana, Missoula, Montana.

16.

Liew

Willson

(2014) Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education 78: 312–320.

17.

Ekwunife-Orakwue

K. C.

Teng

T. L.

(2014) The impact of transactional distance dialogic interactions on student learning outcomes in online and blended environments. Computers & Education 78: 414–427.

18.

Feng

C. Y.

Chen

M. P.

(2014) The effects of goal specificity and scaffolding on programming performance and self-regulation in game design. British Journal of Educational Technology 45(2): 285–302.

19.

Goel

Zhang

Templeton

(2012) Transactional distance revisited: Bridging face and empirical validity. Computers in Human Behavior 28(4): 1122–1129.

20.

Greene

J. A.

Azevedo

(2010) The measurement of learners’ self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychologist 45(4): 203–209.

21.

Hew

K. F.

(2011) Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 27(2): 662–676.

22.

Hrastinski

(2009) A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education 52(1): 78–82.

23.

Huang

Chandra

DePaolo

C. A.

Simmons

L. L.

(2016) Understanding transactional distance in web-based learning environments: An empirical study. British Journal of Educational Technology 47(4): 734–747.

24.

Jumaat

N. F.

Tasir

(2016) A framework of metacognitive scaffolding in learning authoring system through Facebook. Journal of Educational Computing Research.

25.

Kearsley

Lynch

(1996) Structural issues in distance education. Journal of Education for Business 71(4): 191–195.

26.

Kim

M. C.

Hannafin

M. J.

(2011) Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education 56(2): 403–417.

27.

Kuo

Y. C.

Walker

A. E.

Belland

B. R.

Schroder

K. E.

(2013) A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 14(1): 16–39.

28.

Kuo

Y. C.

Walker

A. E.

Belland

B. R.

Schroder

K. E.

Kuo

Y. T.

(2014) A case study of integrating interwise: Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and satisfaction in synchronous online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 15(1): 161–181.

29.

Loncar

Barrett

N. E.

Liu

G. Z.

(2014) Towards the refinement of forum and asynchronous online discussion in educational contexts worldwide: Trends and investigative approaches within a dominant research paradigm. Computers & Education 73: 93–110.

30.

Molenaar

Sleegers

van Boxtel

(2014) Metacognitive scaffolding during collaborative learning: A promising combination. Metacognition and Learning 9(3): 309–332.

31.

Molenaar

van Boxtel

C. A.

Sleegers

P. J.

(2011) Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arrangement. Instructional Science 39(6): 785–803.

32.

Moore

M. G.

Kearsley

(2011) Distance education: A systems view of online learning, Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

33.

Muilenburg

L. Y.

Berge

Z. L.

(2005) Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education 26(1): 29–48.

34.

Murphy

Rodríguez-Manzanares

M. A.

Barbour

(2011) Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology 42(4): 583–591.

35.

Nunnally

J. C.

(1967) Psychometric theory, New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

36.

Offir

Lev

Bezalel

(2008) Surface and deep learning processes in distance education: Synchronous versus asynchronous systems. Computers & Education 51(3): 1172–1183.

37.

Offir

Lev

Barth

Shteinbek

(2004) An integrated analysis of verbal and nonverbal interaction in conventional and distance learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research 31(2): 101–118.

38.

Pifarré

Cobos

Argelagós

(2014) Incidence of group awareness information on students’ collaborative learning processes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 30(4): 300–317.

39.

Pintrich

P. R.

(1999) The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research 31: 459–470.

40.

Pintrich

P. R.

(2000) The roal of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In: Boekaerts

Pintrich

P. R.

Zeidner

(eds) Handbook of self-regulation, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 451–502.

41.

Rabinovich, T. (2009). Transactional distance in a synchronous web-extended classroom learning environment (Doctoral dissertation), Boston University, Boston.

42.

Roebers

C. M.

Krebs

S. S.

Roderer

(2014) Metacognitive monitoring and control in elementary school children: Their interrelations and their role for test performance. Learning and Individual Differences 29: 141–149.

43.

Roll

Aleven

McLaren

B. M.

Koedinger

K. R.

(2011) Improving students’ help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system. Learning and Instruction 21(2): 267–280.

44.

Romiszowski

Mason

(2004) Computer-mediated communication. In: Jonassen

D. H.

(ed.) Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Macmillan, pp. 397–431.

45.

Shin, N. (2001). Beyond interaction: Transactional presence and distance learning (Doctoral dissertation), Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.

46.

Simpson

(2004) The impact on retention of interventions to support distance learning students. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning 19(1): 79–95.

47.

Stein

D. S.

Wanstreet

C. E.

Calvin

Overtoom

Wheaton

J. E.

(2005) Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education 19(2): 105–118.

48.

Swain

(2002) Improving traditional teaching using findings from distance education. Journal of Effective Teaching 5(2): Retrieved 12 June 2012, from http://www.uncw.edu/cte/et/ARTICLES/Swain/index.htm.

49.

Taub

Azevedo

Bouchet

Khosravifar

(2014) Can the use of cognitive and metacognitive self-regulated learning strategies be predicted by learners’ levels of prior knowledge in hypermedia-learning environments? Computers in Human Behavior 39: 356–367.

50.

Wearmouth

Smith

A. P.

Soler

(2004) Computer conferencing with access to a guest expert in the professional development of special educational needs coordinators. British Journal of Educational Technology 35(1): 81–93.

51.

Yamagata-Lynch

L. C.

(2014) Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 15(2): 189–212.

52.

Yılmaz

Keser

(2015) The adaptation study of transactional distance scale. Hacettepe University Journal of Education 30(4): 91–105.

53.

Yılmaz

Kılıç-Çakmak

(2012) Educational interface agents as social models to influence learner achievement, attitude and retention of learning. Computers & Education 59(2): 828–838.

54.

Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction (Doctoral dissertation). Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.

55.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(1990) Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist 25(1): 3–7.

56.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(2002) Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice 41(2): 64–70.