Although the visualization of data is on the agenda for sociologists today, thanks to big data, the author raises the question of whether it may not also be possible to visualize theory and, especially, to improve it through visual thinking. The main purpose of this article, more precisely, is to open up a discussion of how visualization and visual thinking can be used as a tool for theorizing in sociology and thereby help produce new and creative theories. Three different types of visualization are discussed: theory pictures, visual sketches, and theorizing diagrams. Theory pictures summarize a theory that has already been developed. Visual sketches are used for early attempts to theorize; they are then typically discarded and replaced by new sketches. Theorizing diagrams draw on ideas from Charles Sanders Peirce and can be described as visual representations that are used to generate new theories. Examples are supplied.
AbellPeter. 2000. “Putting Social Theory Right?”Sociological Theory18(3):518–23.
2.
AbellPeterFelinTeppoFossNicolai. 2008. “Building Micro-foundations for the Routines, Capabilities, and Performance Links.”Managerial and Decision Economics29(6):489–502.
3.
ArnheimRudolf. 1969. Visual Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
BanksMarcusRubyJay, eds. 2011. Made to Be Seen: Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
BeckerHoward. 2007. “Charts: Thinking with Drawings.” Pp. 167–85 in Telling about Society, edited by BeckerH.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BeckerHoward S.1974. “Photography and Sociology.”Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication1(1):3–26.
8.
BenderJohnMarrinanMichael. 2010. The Culture of Diagram. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
BerwickRobertChomskyNoam. 2016. Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
BrownTim. 2009. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York: HarperCollins.
11.
ChengPeterSimonHerbert. 1995. “Scientific Discovery and Scientific Reasoning with Diagrams.” Pp. 205–28 in The Creative Cognition Approach, edited by SmithS.WardT.FinkeR.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
ColemanJames. 1986. “Social Theory, Social Research and a Theory of Action.”American Journal of Sociology91(6):1309–35.
13.
ColemanJames. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
14.
CoopmansCatelijneVertesiJanetLynchMichaelWolgarSteve, eds. 2014. Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
CromleyJennifer G.Snyder-HoganLindsey E.Luciw-DubasUlana A.2010. “Cognitive Activities in Complex Science Text and Diagram.”Contemporary Educational Psychology35(1):59–74.
16.
De WaalCornelis. 2013. Peirce: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Bloomsbury.
17.
EddyMatthew Daniel. 2014. “How to See a Diagram: A Visual Anthropology of Chemical Affinity.”Osiris29(1):178–96.
18.
EdlingChristofer. 2004. “Mot en Samhällsvetenskaplig Bilderbok? Om Visualisering i Samhällsvetenskapen (Toward a Social Scientific Picture Book? On Visualization in Social Science).” Pp. 156–74 in Bilderna i Samhällsanalysen: Visuella Studier i Teori och Praktik, edited by AspersP.FuehrerP.SverrissonA.Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
FreudSigmund. 1933. New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-analysis. New York: Norton.
27.
FyfeGordonLawJohn, eds. 1984. Picturing Power: Visual Depictions and Social Relations. London, UK: Routledge.
28.
GaltonFrancis. 1951. Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. London: The Eugenics Society.
29.
GamwellLynnSolmsMark. 2006. From Neurology to Psychoanalysis: Sigmund Freud’s Neurological Drawings and Diagrams of the Mind. Binghamton, NY: Binghamton University Art Museum.
30.
GellnerErnest. 1970. “Concepts and Society.” Pp. 18–49 in Rationality, edited by WilsonB.Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
31.
GlasgowNancyNarayananHariChandrasekaranB., eds. 1995. Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
GoffmanErving. 1979. Gender Advertisements. New York: Macmillan.
33.
GoodingDavid. 2010. “Visualizing Scientific Inference.”Topics in Cognitive Science2(1):15–35.
34.
GoodmanNelson. 1976. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis, IN: Hacket.
35.
GoodmanNelsonPerkinsDavidGardnerHoward. 1972. Basic Abilities Required for Understanding and Creation in the Arts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
36.
GradyJohn. Forthcoming. “Visual Sociology.” In The Handbook of 21st Century Sociology, edited by BryantCliftonPeckDennis. London: Sage Ltd.
37.
HealyKieranMoodyJames. 2014“Data Visualization in Sociology.”Annual Review of Sociology40:105–28.
38.
HedströmPeterYlikoskiPetri. 2010. “Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences.”Annual Review of Sociology36:49–67.
39.
HergartyMaryStullAndrew. 2012. “Visuospatial Thinking.” Pp. 606–30 in The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, edited by HolyakK.MorrisonR.New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
HintikkaJaakko. 1983. “C. S. Peirce’s ‘First Real Discovery’ and Its Contemporary Relevance.” Pp. 107–18 in The Relevance of Charles Peirce, edited by FreemanE.La Salle, IL: The Hegeler Institute.
41.
JeppersonRonaldMeyerJohn. 2011. “Multiple Levels of Analysis and the Limitations of Methodological Individualisms.”Sociological Theory29(1):54–73.
42.
KaiserDavid. 2005. Drawing Theories Apart: The Dispersion of Feynman Diagrams in Postwar Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
KentBeverley. 1987. Charles S. Peirce: Logic and the Classification of the Sciences. Kingston, Canada: McGill–Queen’s University Press.
44.
KeynesJohn Maynard. 1951. Essays in Biography. London: Rupert Hart Davis.
KleePaul.[1925] 1953. Pedagogical Sketchbook. New York: Praeger.
47.
KarinKnorr Cetina. 2003. “From Pipes to Scopes: The Flow Architecture of Financial Markets.”Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory4(2):7–23.
48.
LarkinJillSimonHerbert. 1987. “Why a Diagram Is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words.”Cognitive Science11(1):65–99.
49.
LatourBruno. 1986. “Visualization and Cognition: Drawing Things Together.”Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present6(1):1–40.
50.
LockwoodThomas, ed. 2009. Design Thinking: Integrating Innovation, Customer Experience, and Brand Value. New York: Allworth.
51.
LynchMichael. 1991a. “Pictures of Nothing? Visual Construals in Social Theory.”Sociological Theory9(1):1–21.
52.
LynchMichael. 1991b. “Science in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction: Moral and Epistemic Relations between Photographs and Diagrams.”Biology and Philosophy6(2):205–26.
53.
LynchMichaelWoolgarSteve, eds. 1990. Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54.
MandelbrotBenoit. 2012. The Fractalist: Memoirs of a Scientific Maverick. New York: Pantheon.
55.
ManzoGianluca. 2007. “Variables, Mechanisms, and Simulations: Can the Three Methods Be Synthesized?”Revue Française de Sociologie48(5):35–71.
56.
MarshallAlfred.[1920] 1986. Principles of Economics. 8th ed.London: Macmillan.
MertonRobert K.1975. “Structural Analysis in Sociology.” Pp. 21–52 in Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, edited by BlauP.New York: Free Press.
59.
MillsC. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
MisakCheryl. 2010. “The Pragmatic Maxim: How to Get Leverage on a Concept.”Harvard Review of Philosophy17(1):76–87.
61.
NersessianNancy. 2008. Creating Scientific Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62.
OsbornWayne H.2005. “Theory Pictures as Trails: Diagrams and the Navigation of Theoretical Narratives.”Cognitive Science Online3(2):15–44.
63.
PeirceCharles S.1906. “Prolegomena to an Apology for Pragmatism.”The Monist16(4):492–546.
64.
PeirceCharles S.1932. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
65.
PeirceCharles S.1966. Selected Writings. New York: Dover.
66.
PeirceCharles S.1991. Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotics by Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by HoopesJ.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
67.
PeirceCharles S.1998. The Essential Peirce. Vol. 2. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
68.
PesicPeter. 2014. Music and the Making of Modern Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69.
PietarinenAhti-Veikko. 2006. Signs of Logic: Peircean Themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games, and Communication. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
PodolnyJoel. 2003. “A Picture is Worth a Thousand Symbols: A Sociologist’s View of the Economic Pursuit of Truth.”American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings93(2):169–74.
72.
RobertsDon. 1973. The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
73.
SampsonRobert. 2013. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
74.
SartreJean-Paul.[1940] 2004. The Imaginary: A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination. London, UK: Routledge.
75.
SchulheisHolgerCarlsonLaura. 2013. “Spatial Reasoning.” Pp. 710–32 in The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology, edited by ReisbergD.New York: Oxford University Press.
76.
ShahPritsiMiyakeAkira, eds. 2005. The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
SimonHerbert. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. 3rd ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79.
SlawskiCarl. 1989. “Graphic Templates for Synthesizing Sociological Theories.”International Social Science Review64(3):111–22.
80.
StinchcombeArthur. 1986. “Merton’s Theory of Social Structure.” Pp. 290–317 in Stratification and Organization, edited by StinchcombeA.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81.
StjernfeltFrederik. 2007. Diagrammatology: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Phenomenology, Ontology, and Semiotics. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
