Visualization (i.e., the use of figures and images to represent findings and conceptual models) is central to theorizing. Yet, by focusing solely on the textual content of papers, analysis has inadvertently marginalized the graphic representations of key ideas. We review the paradox literature not just in terms of what authors have written but also how they have visualized models concisely. An analysis of figures in paradox articles captures the essential role that visuals play in our understanding of competing tensions, leveraging the power of imagery. We explore paradox visually, searching for the figurative materialization of paradox; more particularly, we seek visual signs that render abstract ideas more saliently and concretely. We contribute to paradox theory in three ways. First, we show how visuals constitute the lynchpin between convergent and divergent forces, allowing scholars to simultaneously reinforce and challenge current understanding. Second, we offer a tool for scholars to theorize competing demands based on three key antinomies, or dualities, that define the terrain of research in our field. Third, we reveal the performative effect of figures by identifying the ongoing dominance of certain classes of paradox visuals, which allows us to point to uncharted territories for paradox research.
AbdallahChahrazadDenisJean-LouisLangleyAnn (2011). Having your cake and eating it too: Discourses of transcendence and their role in organizational change dynamics. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24, 333–348.
2.
AndriopoulosCostasLewisMarianne W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20, 696–717.
3.
ArjalièsDiane-LaureBansalPratima (2018). Beyond numbers: How investment managers accommodate societal issues in financial decisions. Organization Studies, 39, 691–719.
4.
AshforthBlake E.ReingenPeter H. (2014). Functions of dysfunction: Managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 474–516.
5.
AshforthBlake E.RogersKristie M.PrattMichael G.PradiesCamille (2014). Ambivalence in organizations: A multilevel approach. Organization Science, 25, 1453–1478.
6.
AustinJohn L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
AvakianStephanos (2020). Nikos Kazantzakis’s phenomenology and its relevance to the study of organizations. Culture and Organization, 26, 250–267.
8.
BansalPratimaBertelsStephanieEwartTomMacConnachiePeterO’BrienJames (2012). Bridging the research–practice gap. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, 73–92.
9.
BednarekMonikaCapleHelen (2014). Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analysing news discourse in critical discourse analysis and beyond. Discourse & Society, 25, 135–158.
10.
BednarekRebeccaParoutisSotiriosSillinceJohn (2017). Transcendence through rhetorical practices: Responding to paradox in the science sector. Organization Studies, 38, 77–101.
11.
BergerJohn (1972). Ways of seeing. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
12.
BertiMarco (2017). Elgar introduction to organizational discourse analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
13.
BertiMarcoCunhaMiguel P. (2022). Paradox, dialectics or trade-offs? A double loop model of paradox. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12899
14.
BertiMarcoSimpsonAce V. (2021a). The dark side of organizational paradoxes: The dynamics of disempowerment. Academy of Management Review, 46, 252–274.
15.
BertiMarcoSimpsonAce V. (2021b). On the practicality of resisting pragmatic paradoxes. Academy of Management Review, 46, 409–412.
16.
BertiMarcoSimpsonAce V.CunhaMiguel P.CleggStewart R. (2021). Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
17.
BesharovMarya L.SmithWendy K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39, 364–381.
CalabrettaGiuliaGemserGerdaWijnbergNachoem M. (2017). The interplay between intuition and rationality in strategic decision making: A paradox perspective. Organization Studies, 38, 365–401.
20.
CarmineSimoneAndriopoulosConstantineGotsiMantoHärtelCharmine E. J.KrzeminskaAnnaMaficoNkosana, et al. (2021). A paradox approach to organizational tensions during the pandemic crisis. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30, 138–153.
21.
CleggStewart R.CunhaMiguel P. (2017). Organizational dialectics. In LewisMarianne W.SmithWendy K.JarzabkowskiPaulaLangleyAnn (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox (pp. 105–124). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
CleggStewart R.CunhaMiguel P.BertiMarco (2022). Research movements and theorizing dynamics in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 47, 382–401.
23.
CleggStewart R.CunhaJoao V.CunhaMiguel P. (2002). Management paradoxes: A relational view. Human Relations, 55, 483–503.
CornelissenJoep (2006). Making sense of theory construction: Metaphor and disciplined imagination. Organization Studies, 27, 1579–1597.
26.
CornelissenJoep (2017). Editor’s comments: Developing propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate. Academy of Management Review, 42, 1–9.
27.
CunhaMiguel P.PutnamLinda (2019). Paradox theory and the paradox of success. Strategic Organization, 17, 95–106.
28.
CunhaMiguel P.SimpsonAce V.CleggStewart R.RegoArmenio (2019). Speak! Paradoxical effects of a managerial culture of ‘speaking up.’British Journal of Management, 30, 829–846.
29.
D’AdderioLucianaPollockNeil (2014). Performing modularity: Competing rules, performative struggles and the effect of organizational theories on the organization. Organization Studies, 35, 1813–1843.
30.
DeLucaKevin M. (1999). Image politics. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
31.
EngeströmYrjöSanninoAnnalisa (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24, 368–387.
32.
ErdoganIrmakRondiEmanuelaDe MassisAlfredo (2020). Managing the tradition and innovation paradox in family firms: A family imprinting perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44, 20–54.
33.
EwensteinBorisWhyteJennifer (2009). Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as ‘epistemic objects’. Organization Studies, 30, 7–30.
34.
FairhurstGail (2019). Reflections: Return paradox to the wild? Paradox interventions and their implications. Journal of Change Management, 19, 6–22.
35.
FulmerIngrid S. (2012). Editor’s comments: The craft of writing theory articles—Variety and similarity in AMR. Academy of Management Review, 37, 327–331.
36.
GaimMedhanieCleggStewart R.CunhaMiguel P. (2021). Managing impressions rather than emissions: Volkswagen and the false mastery of paradox. Organization Studies, 42, 949–970.
37.
GibsonJames (1978). The ecological approach to the visual perception of pictures. Leonardo, 11, 227–235.
38.
GilbertFrédéricMichaudValérieBenteinKathleenDuboisCarl-ArdyBédardJean-Luc (2018). Unpacking the dynamics of paradoxes across levels: Cascading tensions and struggling professionals. In FarjounMosheSmithWendy K.LangleyAnnTsoukasHaridimos (Eds.), Dualities, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizational life (pp. 56–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
GotsiMantoAndriopoulosConstantineLewisMarianne W.IngramAmy E. (2010). Managing creatives: Paradoxical approaches to identity regulation. Human Relations, 63, 781–805.
40.
GroarkeLeoPalczewskiCatherine H.GoddenDavid (2016). Navigating the visual turn in argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52, 217–235.
41.
GümüsayAli A.SmetsMichaelMorrisTim (2020). “God at work”: Engaging central and incompatible institutional logics through elastic hybridity. Academy of Management Journal, 63, 124–154.
42.
HadjimichaelDemetrisTsoukasHaridimos (2019). Toward a better understanding of tacit knowledge in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 13, 672–703.
43.
HageGhassan (2009). Waiting out the crisis: On stuckedness and governmentality. Anthropological Theory, 5, 463–475.
44.
HahnTobiasKnightEric (2021a). A quantum approach to paradox entails neither preexisting tensions nor asymmetry: Response to Li. Academy of Management Review, 46, 415–419.
45.
HahnTobiasKnightEric (2021b). The ontology of organizational paradox: A quantum approach. Academy of Management Review, 46, 362–384.
46.
HahnTobiasJonathanPinksePreussLutzFiggeFrank (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 297–316.
47.
HalginDaniel S.GlynnMary AnnRockwellDean (2018). Organizational actorhood and the management of paradox: A visual analysis. Organization Studies, 39, 645–664.
48.
HargraveTimothy (2020). The paradox perspective and the dialectics of contradictions research. In PooleMarshall S.Van de VenAndrew H (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational change and innovation (pp. 161–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
HargraveTimothyVan de VenAndrew H. (2017). Integrating dialectical and paradox perspectives on managing contradictions in organizations. Organization Studies, 38, 319–339.
50.
HernesTorBakkenTore (2003). Implications of self-reference: Niklas Luhmann’s autopoiesis and organization theory. Organization Studies, 24, 1511–1535.
51.
HuqJo-LouiseReayTrishChreimSamia (2017). Protecting the paradox of interprofessional collaboration. Organization Studies, 38, 513–538.
52.
JarzabkowskiPaulaBednarekRebeccaChalkiasKonstantinosCacciatoriEugenia (2022). Enabling rapid financial response to disasters: Knotting and reknotting multiple paradoxes in interorganizational systems. Academy of Management Journal, 65, 1477–1506.
53.
JarzabkowskiPaulaLêJane (2017). We have to do this and that? You must be joking: Constructing and responding to paradox through humor. Organization Studies, 38, 433–462.
54.
JarzabkowskiPaulaLêJaneVan de VenAndrew H. (2013). Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11, 245–280.
KassinisGeorgePanayiotouAlexia (2017). The helix of change: A visual metaphor. European Management Review, 14, 143–163.
57.
KassinisGeorgePanayiotouAlexia (2018). Visuality as greenwashing: The case of BP and Deepwater Horizon. Organization & Environment, 31, 25–47.
58.
KeganRobert (1982). The evolving self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
KellerJoshChenErica (2017). A road map of the paradoxical mind. In SmithWendy K.LewisMarianne W.JarzabkowskiPaulaLangleyAnn (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox (pp. 66–86). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
KellerJoshuaCarmineSimoneJarzabkowskiPaulaLewisMarianne W.PradiesCamilleSharmaGarima, et al. (2021). Our collective tensions: Paradox research community’s response to COVID-19. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30, 168–176.
61.
KetokiviMikkoMantereSakuCornelissenJoep (2017). Reasoning by analogy and the progress of theory. Academy of Management Review, 42, 637–658.
62.
KressGuntherVan LeeuwenTheo (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
63.
KoliMaragaretLêJane (2022). Seeing paradoxes anew: Contradictory elements in Bantu philosophical traditions and African symbols. Paper presented at EGOS, Vienna.
64.
KornbergerMartin (2017). The values of strategy: Valuation practices, rivalry and strategic agency. Organization Studies, 38, 1753–1773.
65.
LangeDonaldPfarrerMichael D. (2017). Editors’ comments: Sense and structure—The core building blocks of an AMR article. Academy of Management Review, 42, 407–416.
66.
LangleyAnnKlagMalvina (2019). Being where? Navigating the involvement paradox in qualitative research accounts. Organizational Research Methods, 22, 515–538.
67.
LangleyAnnRavasiDavide (2019). Visual artefacts as tools for analysis and theorizing. In ZilberTamar B.AmisJohn M.JohannaMair (Eds.), The production of managerial knowledge and organizational theory: New approaches to writing, producing and consuming theory. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 59, pp. 173–199). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
68.
LêPatrickPradiesCamille (2022). Sailing through the storm: Improvising paradox navigation during the pandemic. Management Learning, 54, 56–76.
69.
LewisMarianne W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760–776.
70.
LewisMarianne W.DehlerGordon E. (2000). Learning through paradox: A pedagogical strategy for exploring contradictions and complexity. Journal of Management Education, 24, 708–725.
71.
LewisMarianne W.SmithWendy K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50, 127–149.
72.
LewisMarianne W.WelshM. AnnDehlerGordon E.GreenStephen (2002). Product development tensions: Exploring contrasting styles of project management. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 546–564.
73.
LiXin (2021a). Quantum approach to organizational paradox: A Copenhagen perspective. Academy of Management Review, 46, 413–415.
74.
LiXin (2021b). Solving paradox by reducing expectation. Academy of Management Review, 46, 406–408.
75.
LindgreenAdamMaonFrancois (2019). Editorial: Organization and management paradoxes. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21, 139–142.
76.
LowyAlexHoodPhil (2004). The power of the 2×2 matrix: Using 2×2 thinking to solve business problems and make better decisions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
77.
LuhmannNiklas (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
78.
LüscherLotteLewisMarianne W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 221–240.
79.
MartiEmilioGondJean-Pascal (2018). When do theories become self-fulfilling? Exploring the boundary conditions of performativity. Academy of Management Review, 43, 487–508.
80.
MessarisPaulAbrahamLinus (2001). The role of images in framing news stories. In ReeseStephen D.AugustGrant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 215–226). New York, NY: Routledge.
81.
MeyerMarshall W. (1972). Size and the structure of organizations: A causal analysis. American Sociological Review, 37, 434–440.
82.
MeyerRenate E.HöllererMarkus A.JancsaryDennisvan LeeuwenTheo (2013). The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research: Core ideas, current developments, and promising avenues. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 487–553.
83.
MillerDanny (1993). The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 116–138.
84.
Ofori-DankwaJosephJulianScott D. (2004). Conceptualizing social science paradoxes using the diversity and similarity curves model: Illustrations from the work/play and theory novelty/continuity paradoxes. Human Relations, 57, 1449–1477.
85.
OrlikowskiWanda (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7, 63–92.
86.
PamphileVontrese D. (2022). Paradox peers: A relational approach to navigating paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 65, 1274–1302.
87.
Parmentier-CajaibaAuraCajaiba-SantanaGiovany (2020). Visual maps for process research: Displaying the invisible. Management, 23, 65–79.
88.
ParsonsTalcott (2013). The social system. London: Routledge.
89.
PooleMarshalVan de VenAndrew H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14, 562–578.
90.
PradiesCamille (2022). With head and heart: How emotions shape paradox navigation in veterinary work. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0633
91.
PradiesCamilleAustInaBednarekRebeccaBrandlJuliaCarmineSimoneChealJoe, et al. (2021). The lived experience of paradox: How individuals navigate tensions during the pandemic crisis. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30, 154–167.
92.
PradiesCamilleDelangheMariekeLewisMarianne W. (2020). Paradox, leadership and the connecting leader. In ZahiraJaser (Ed.), The connecting leader: Serving concurrently as a leader and a follower (pp. 99–129). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
93.
PradiesCamilleTunarosaAndreaLewisMarianne W.CourtoisJulie (2021). From vicious to virtuous paradox dynamics: The social-symbolic work of supporting actors. Organization Studies, 42, 1241–1263.
94.
PutnamLindaFairhurstGailBanghartScott (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 65–171.
95.
QuattronePaoloRonzaniMatteoJancsaryDennisHöllererMarkus A. (2021). Beyond the visible, the material and the performative: Shifting perspectives on the visual in organization studies. Organization Studies, 42, 1197–1218.
96.
QuinnRobert E.CameronKim S (Eds.) (1988). Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
97.
RaischSebastianHargraveTimothy J.van de VenAndrew H. (2018). The learning spiral: A process perspective on paradox. Journal of Management Studies, 55, 1507–1526.
98.
RavasiDavide (2017). Visualizing our way through theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26, 240–243.
99.
SchadJonathanBansalPratima (2018). Seeing the forest and the trees: How a systems perspective informs paradox research. Journal of Management Studies, 55, 1490–1506.
100.
SchadJonathanLewisMarianne W.RaischSebastianSmithWendy K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 5–64.
101.
SchadJonathanLewisMarianne W.SmithWendy K. (2019). Quo vadis, paradox? Centripetal and centrifugal forces in theory development. Strategic Organization, 17, 107–119.
102.
ScottW. RichardDavisGerald F. (2015). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural and open systems perspectives. London: Routledge.
103.
SharmaGarimaBartunekJeanBuzzanellPatrice M.CarmineSimoneEndresCarsynEtterMichael, et al. (2021). A paradox approach to societal tensions during the pandemic crisis. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30, 121–137.
104.
SharmaGarimaGoodDarren (2003). The work of middle managers: Sensemaking and sensegiving for creating positive social change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49, 95–122.
105.
SheepMathew L.FairhurstGail T.KhazanchiShalini (2017). Knots in the discourse of innovation: Investigating multiple tensions in a reacquired spin-off. Organization Studies, 38, 463–488.
106.
SlawinskiNatalieWinsorBlairMazutisDainaSchoutenJohnSmithWendy K. (2021). Managing the paradoxes of place to foster regeneration. Organization & Environment, 34, 595–618.
107.
SmithWendy K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1592–1623.
108.
SmithWendy K.BesharovMarya (2019). Bowing before dual Gods: How structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64, 1–44.
109.
SmithWendy K.LewisMarianne W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403.
110.
SteyaertChrisMartiLaurentMichelsChristophe (2012). Multiplicity and reflexivity in organizational research: Towards a performative approach to the visual. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 7, 34–53.
111.
StraussAnselm L.CorbinJuliet M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 2). London: SAGE.
112.
SundaramurthyChamuLewisMarianne W. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28, 397–415.
113.
SuttonRobert I.StawBarry M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371–384.
114.
SwedbergRichard (2016). Can you visualize theory? On the use of visual thinking in theory pictures, theorizing diagrams, and visual sketches. Sociological Theory, 34, 250–275.
115.
TausczikYla R.PennebakerJames W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54.
TsoukasHaridimosCunhaMiguel P. (2017). On organizational circularity: Vicious and virtuous circles in organizing. In SmithWendy K.LewisMarianne W.JarzabkowskiPaulaLangleyAnn (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox (pp. 393–412). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
118.
TuckermannHarald (2019). Visibilizing and invisibilizing paradox: A process study of interactions in a hospital executive board. Organization Studies, 40, 1851–1872.
119.
Van BommelKoenSpicerAndré (2017). Critical management studies and paradox. In SmithWendy K.LewisMarianne W.JarzabkowskiPaulaLangleyAnn (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox (pp. 143–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
120.
VinceRuss (2021). Reflections on the role of bemusement in institutional disruption. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30, 273–284.
121.
VinceRussBroussineMichael (1996). Paradox, defense and attachment: Accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organization Studies, 17, 1–21.
122.
WeickKarl E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14, 516–531.
123.
WeickKarl E. (2007). The generative properties of richness. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 14–19.
124.
WhettenDavid A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review, 14, 490–495.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
