A non-fire-retardant and a fire retardant polyurethane foam are tested under a nitrogen environment using thermogravimetry at different heating rates of 1, 5, 20 and 60 °C min−1 to obtain the foams’ decomposition behaviours. During decomposition, both foams experience two major mass loss reactions with the second reaction consuming most of the fuel. Three graphical techniques applied to calculate the kinetic properties governing each reaction are kinetic analysis, the Arrhenius plot method and the inflection point methods. In general, these methods are compatible with the pyrolysis model within Fire Dynamics Simulator Version 5 and Gpyro. A normalised version of the inflection point methods is also developed to improve the suitability of the kinetic properties with the simplest decomposition scheme of the pyrolysis model. A consistent trend is noted in the calculated kinetic properties of both foams regardless of the calculation techniques applied.
BilbaoRMastralJFCeamanosJ. Kinetics of the thermal decomposition of polyurethane foams in nitrogen and air atmospheres. J Anal Appl Pyrol1996; 37(1): 69–82.
2.
ChaoCYHWangJH. Comparison of the thermal decomposition behaviour of a non-fire retarded and a fire retarded flexible polyurethane foam with phosphorus and brominated additives. J Fire Sci2001; 19(2): 137–156.
3.
McGrattanKBaumHRehmR. Fire dynamics simulator (version 5) technical reference guide, volume 1: mathematical model, FDS version 5.5, SVN repository revision: 6909. NIST Special Publication 1018-5, 29October2010. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
4.
LautenbergerC. Gpyro – a generalized pyrolysis model for combustible solids, users’ guide, version 0.700. Berkeley, CA: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, 2009.
5.
PauDSW. A comparative study on combustion behaviours of polyurethane foams with numerical simulations using pyrolysis models. PhD Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand, 2013.
6.
PrasadKKramerRMarshN. Numerical simulation of fire spread on polyurethane foam slabs. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on fire and materials, San Francisco, CA, 26–28 January 2009, pp. 697–708. London: Interscience Communications Limited.
7.
ReinGLautenbergerCFernandez-PelloAC. Application of genetic algorithms and thermogravimetry to determine the kinetics of polyurethane foam in smoldering combustion. Combust Flame2006; 146(1–2): 95–108.
8.
ReinGBar-IlanAFernandez-PelloAC. Modelling of one-dimensional smoldering of polyurethane in microgravity conditions. In: Proceedings of the 30th international symposium on combustion, Chicago, IL, 25–30 July 2004, pp. 2327–2334. Pittsburgh, PA: Combustion Institute (vol. 30, no. 2, 2005).
9.
RogersFEOhlemillerTJ. Pyrolysis kinetics of a polyurethane foam by thermogravimetry; a general kinetic method. J Macromol Sci A1981; 15(1): 169–185.
10.
HouckCRJoinesJAKayMG. A genetic algorithm for function optimization: a Matlab implementation. Technical report NCSU-IE TR 95-09, 1995. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
11.
GorbachevVM. A solution of the exponential integral in the non-isothermal kinetics for linear heating. J Therm Anal Calorim1975; 8(2): 349–350.
12.
PriceDLiuYMilnesGJ. An investigation into the mechanism of flame retardancy and smoke suppression by melamine in flexible polyurethane foam. Fire Mater2002; 26(4–5): 201–206.
13.
BS 5852:2006. Methods of test for assessment of the ignitability of upholstered seating by smouldering and flaming ignition sources. London: British Standards Institution, 2006.
14.
AS/NZS 1530.3:1999. Methods for fire tests on building materials, components and structures – simultaneous determination of ignitability, flame propagation, heat release and smoke release. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Standards Australia, 1999.
15.
Technical Bulletin 117. Requirements, test procedure and apparatus for testing the flame retardance of resilient filling materials used in upholstered furniture. Sacramento, CA: Bureau of Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation, 2000.
16.
Part 25 - Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes. Appendix F to part 25, part I - test criteria and procedures for showing compliance with § 25.853, or § 25.855. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 1972.
17.
DeneckerCLiggatJJSnapeCE. Relationship between the thermal degradation chemistry and flammability of commercial flexible polyurethane foams. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 100(4): 3024–3033.
18.
ValenciaLBRogaumeTGuillaumeE. Analysis of principal gas products during combustion of polyether polyurethane foam at different irradiance levels. Fire Safety J2009; 44(7): 933–940.
19.
TewarsonA. Generation of heat and chemical compounds in fires. In: DiNennoPJDrysdaleDBeylerCL. (eds) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. 3rd ed.Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 2002, pp. 3-82–3-161.
20.
SaberHHKashefABwalyaAC. Numerical and experimental investigations of fire behaviour due to polyurethane foam and wood cribs in a medium-sized residential room. Research report # RR-291, 8March2010. Ottawa, ON, Canada: NRC Institute for Research in Construction.
21.
AshtonHC. Fire retardants. In: XanthosM (ed.) Functional fillers for plastics. 2nd ed.Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2010, pp. 309–350.
22.
GrassieNPerdomo MendozaGA. Thermal degradation of polyether-urethanes: part 2 – influence of the fire retardant, ammonium polyphosphate, on the thermal degradation of poly(ethylene glycol). Polym Degrad Stabil1985; 10(1): 43–54.
23.
GrassieNPerdomo MendozaGA. Thermal degradation of polyether-urethanes: part 4 – effect of ammonium polyphosphate on the thermal degradation of polyether-urethanes prepared from methylene bis(4-phenylisocyanate) and low molecular weight poly(ethylene glycols). Polym Degrad Stabil1985; 11(2): 145–166.
24.
LevchikSV. Introduction to flame retardancy and polymer flammability. In: MorganABWilkieCA (eds) Flame retardant polymer nanocomposites. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2007, pp. 1–30.
25.
FriedmanHL. Kinetics of thermal degradation of charforming plastics from thermogravimetry. Application to a phenolic plastic. J Polym Sci Pol Sym1964; 6(1): 183–195.
26.
LautenbergerCKimEDembseyN. The role of decomposition kinetics in pyrolysis modelling – application to a fire retardant polyester composite. In: Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on fire safety science, Karlsruhe, Germany, 21–26 September 2008, pp. 1201–1212. London: International Association for Fire Safety Science.
27.
ViswanathSGGuptaMC. Estimation of nonisothermal kinetic parameters from a TG curve by the methods of overdetermined system and inflection point. Thermochim Acta1996; 285(2): 259–267.
28.
MatalaALautenbergerCHostikkaS. Generalized direct method for pyrolysis kinetic parameter estimation and comparison to existing methods. J Fire Sci2012; 30(4): 339–356.
