The aim of the research was to test the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Vigil-Colet et al.’s Statistical Anxiety Scale (SAS), taking into account evidences based on (a) internal structure (factorial structure and cross-country invariance) and (b) relationships to other variables (the statistics anxiety’s nomological network). Consistent with the original Spanish version, the Italian version showed a three-factor structure, and results indicated a substantial equivalence of factor model parameters across countries. SAS results appeared to be inversely related to mathematical ability, self-efficacy, and attitudes toward statistics. The overall findings of the present study provide evidence for the validity and reliability of the SAS as a measure of statistics anxiety across the Italian and Spanish educational frameworks.
BalogluM. (2003). Individual differences in statistics anxiety among college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 855-865.
2.
BaumgartnerH.SteenkampJ. B. E. M. (1998). Multi-group latent variable models for varying numbers of items and factors with cross-national and longitudinal applications. Marketing Letters, 9, 21-35.
3.
CarmonaJ.PrimiC.ChiesiF. (2008, July). Testing for measurement invariance of the Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics: A comparison of Italian and Spanish students. Paper presented at the III European Congress of Methodology, Oviedo, Spain.
4.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
5.
ChiesiF.PrimiC. (2009). Assessing statistics attitudes among college students: Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics (SATS). Learning and Individual Differences,19, 309-313.
6.
ChiesiF.PrimiC. (2010). Cognitive and non-cognitive factors related to students’ statistic achievement. Statistics Education Research Journal, 9, 6-26.
7.
ChiesiF.PrimiC.GalliS. (2007, September). Un contributo all’adattamento della versione italiana della scala (Current Statistics Self-Efficacy—CSSE) [The adaptation of the Italian version of the Current Statistics Self-Efficacy (CSSE)]. Paper presented at the Congresso Nazionale AIP—Sezione di Psicologia Sperimentale, Como, Italy.
8.
CruiseJ. R.CashR. W.BoltonL. D. (1985). Development and validation of an instrument to measure statistical anxiety. In ASA proceedings of the section statistical education (pp. 92-97). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
9.
EndersC. K. (2006). Analyzing structural equation models with missing data. In HancockG.MuellerR. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 313-342). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
10.
FeldtL. B.WoodruffD. J.SalihF. A.SrichaiM. (1986). Statistical tests and confidence intervals for Cronbach’s coefficient alpha(Iowa Testing Programs Occasional Papers No. 33). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED291755)
11.
FinneyS. J.SchrawG. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs in college statistics courses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 161-186.
12.
FitzgeraldS. M.JursS.HudsonL. M. (1996). A model predicting statistics achievement among graduate students. College Student Journal, 30, 361-366.
13.
GalliS.ChiesiF.PrimiC. (2008). The construction of a scale to measure mathematical ability in psychology students: An application of the Rasch model. Testing Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology, 15, 3-18.
14.
GalliS.ChiesiF.PrimiC. (2010, September). Una misura task-specific dell’autoefficacia in matematica [A task-specific measure of mathematical self-efficacy]. Paper presented at the Congresso Nazionale AIP—Sezione di Psicologia Sperimentale, Bologna, Italy.
15.
HambletonR. K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In HambletonR. K.MerendaP. F.SpielbergerC. D. (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
HongE.KarstenssonL. (2002). Antecedent of state test anxiety. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 348-367.
17.
JamshidianM.BentlerP. M. (1999). ML estimation of mean and covariance structures with missing data using complete data routines. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 21-41.
18.
KeeleyJ.ZayacR. M.CorreiaC. (2008). Curvilinear relationships between statistics anxiety and performance among undergraduate students: Evidence for optimal anxiety. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7, 4-15.
19.
KimK. H.BentlerP. M. (2002). Tests of homogeneity of means and covariance matrices for multivariate incomplete data. Psychometrika, 67, 609-624.
20.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
21.
KranzlerJ.PajaresF. (1997). An exploratory factor analysis of the Mathematics Self-Efficacy Scale–Revised, MSES-R. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 29, 215-228.
22.
LittleT. D.CardN. A.SlegersD. W.LedfordE. C. (2007). Representing contextual effects in multiple-group MACS models. In LittleT. D.BovairdJ. A.CardN. A. (Eds.), Modeling ecological and contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 121-147). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2003). Modeling statistics achievement among graduate students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 1020-1038.
25.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.WilsonV. (2003). Statistics anxiety: Nature, etiology antecedents, effects, and treatments—A comprehensive review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 8, 195-209.
26.
PretoriusT. B.NormanA. M. (1992). Psychometric data on the Statistics Anxiety Scale for a sample of South African students. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 52, 933-937.
27.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243-248.
28.
SchauC.StevensJ.DauphineT.Del VecchioA. (1995). The development and validation of the Survey of Attitudes Towards Statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 868-875.
29.
TremblayP. F.GardnerR. C.HeipelG. (2000). A model of the relationship among measures of affect, aptitude, and performance in introductory statistics. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 32, 40-48.
30.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70.
31.
Vigil-ColetA.Lorenzo-SevaU.CondonL. (2008). Development and validation of the Statistical Anxiety Scale. Psicothema, 20, 174-180.
32.
WalshJ. J.Ugumba-AgwunobiG. (2002). Individual differences in statistics anxiety: The roles of perfectionism, procrastination and trait anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 239-251.
33.
YuanK. H.BentlerP. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30, 165-200.
34.
ZeidnerM. (1991). Statistics and mathematics anxiety in social science students: Some interesting parallels. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 319-328.
