This study examined reliability and validity of the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA), based on samples of parents and teachers’ ratings of 1,145 entering kindergartners in the Southwest. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that DECA presented good reliability and validity for manifest variables, corroborating previous findings. Three latent variables (initiative, self-control, and attachment) substantiated reliability estimates but showed insufficient discriminant validity because of multicollinearity among latent variables. We recommended caution in interpreting and applying results of DECA assessments in practice because of a lack of discriminant validity. Thus, these findings addressed the need for researchers, educators, and policy makers to consider alternative instruments for early identification of social and emotional problems in young children until new research and a revised DECA model show evidence for the validity of outcomes.
AllisonP. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 545-557.
2.
BagozziR. P.YiY. (1988). On the evaluation of the structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
3.
BollenK. A. (1989), Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
4.
BrinkmanT. M.WigentC. A.TomacR. A.PhamA. V.CarlsonJ. S. (2007). Using the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment to identify behavioral risk and protective factors within a Head Start population. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 22(2), 136-151.
5.
BrowneT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
BuhsE. S. (2003). Devereux Early Childhood Assessment. In PlakeB. S.ImparaJ. C.SpiesR. A. (Eds.), The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 312-314). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
7.
ByrneB. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
ChittooranM. M. (2003). Devereux Early Childhood Assessment. In PlakeB. S.ImparaJ. C.SpiesR. A. (Eds.), The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 314-316). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
10.
ClarkL. A.WatsonD. (2003). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. In KazdinA. E. (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (pp. 207-231). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11.
CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and application. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.
12.
DiamantopoulosA.SiguawJ. A. (2000). A guide for the uninitiated. London, UK: SAGE.
13.
FarrellA. M. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research, 63, 324-327.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
16.
GilksW.RichardsonS.SpiegelhalterD. (1995). Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. New York, NY: Chapman Hall.
17.
JabergP. EDixonD. J.WeisG. M. (2009). Replication evidence in support of the psychometric properties of the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 24, 158-166.
LeBuffeP. A.NaglieriJ. A. (1999a). Technical manual for the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA). Villanova, PA: Devereux Foundation.
21.
LeBuffeP. A.NaglieriJ. A. (1999b). Devereux Early Childhood Assessment user’s guide. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan.
22.
LeBuffeP.NaglieriJ. A. (2003). The Devereux Early Childhood Assessment Clinical form (DECA-C). Lewisville, NC: Kaplan Press.
23.
LienM. T.CarlsonJ. S. (2009). Psychometric properties of the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment in a Head Start sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 386-396.
Oades-SeseG. V.KaliskiP. K.WeissK. (2010). Factor structure of the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment Clinical form in low-income Hispanic American bilingual preschool children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 357-372.
26.
RaykovT. (2004). Behavioral scale reliability and measurement invariance evaluation using latent variable modeling. Behavior Therapy, 35, 299-331.
27.
ReddyL (2007). Test reviews. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 22(1), 121-127.
SchumackerR. E.LomaxR. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Taylor Francis.
30.
SquiresJ. K. (2000). Identifying social/emotional and behavioral problems in infants and toddlers. Infant-Toddler Intervention, 10(2), 107-119.
31.
YadenD.CimettaA.MarxR.TarenD.PerryN.EnzB.GallagherL. (2011). Arizona Kindergarten Readiness Study (Technical Report No. 1). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, College of Education, First Things First External Evaluation.
32.
YuanY. C. (2000). Multiple imputations for missing data: Concepts and new development. (SAS Technical Report No. P267-25). Rockville, MD: SAS Institute.
