The Brigance Comprehensive Inventory of Basic Skills-II (CIBS-II) is the newest version of a long-standing instrument that is useful for identifying student achievement, identifying and monitoring academic strengths and weaknesses, obtaining data to support referrals, and reporting progress for individual educational plans. Since the CIBS-II is intended to comply with requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), validity studies are required. This study provides evidence to support the use of CIBS-II scores. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the proposed factor model and rival models. A randomly split sample design allowed for cross-validation evidence. The best-fitting model was in accordance with the proposed structure.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
BriganceA. H. (1998). Comprehensive Inventory of Basic Skills—revised. North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
5.
BriganceA. H. (2010). Comprehensive Inventory of Basic Skills—II. North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
6.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.
7.
CizekG. J. (2001). Test review of the CIBS-R. From B. S. Plake & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The fourteenth mental measurements yearbook. Retrieved from the http://www.unl.edu/buros
8.
ConnollyA. J. (1998). KeyMath—revised normative update: A diagnostic inventory of essential mathematics. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. (2007). Common core of data, 2006-07[Data file]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd
11.
ErfordB.DuttonJ. L. (2005). Technical analysis of the Slosson Phonics and Structural Analysis Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 1011-1025.
12.
FergusonJ.KerstingF. (1988). Comparison of diagnostic inventories used in special education with state-approved essential skills tests (KEST). Journal of Human Behavior & Learning, 5, 39-42.
13.
FrenchB. F.FinchW. H. (2006). Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 378-402.
14.
FrenchB. F.GlascoeF. P. (2010). Comprehensive Inventory of Basic Skills-II standardization and validation manual. North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
15.
GlascoeF. P. (1999). Comprehensive Inventory of Basic Skills—revised standardization and validation manual. North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
16.
GreenJ. P.Jr. (2007). Determining the reliability and validity of service quality scores in a public library context: A confirmatory approach. PhD dissertation, Capella University, Minneapolis, MN. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 3241793)
17.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
KaneM. T. (2006). Validation. In BrennanR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17-64). Westport, CT: Praeger.
22.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
23.
KoretzD. M.HamiltonL. S. (2006). Testing for accountability in K-12. In BrennanR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 531-578). Westport, CT: Praeger.
24.
KrawiecR. M.SpadaforeG. J. (1983). Comparing the Brigance Diagnostic Inventory of Basic Skills and the Wide Range Achievement Test. Reading Improvement, 20, 230-232.
25.
MacCallumR. C. (1995). Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 16-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
McGrewK. S.WendlingB. J. (2010). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive-achievement relations: What we have learned from the past 20 years of research. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 651-674.
27.
McLellanM. J. (2001). Test review of the BRIGANCE Comprehensive Inventory of Basic Skills-R. From PlakeB. S.ImparaJ. C. (Eds.), The fourteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 172-175). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute.
28.
MessickS. (1989). Validity. In LinnR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York, NY: Macmillan.
29.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
30.
StevensJ. J.ZvochK. (2007). Confirmatory factor analysis of the TerraNova Comprehensive Tests of Basic Skills/5. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 976-989.
31.
ThompsonB. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32.
ThompsonB.DanielL. G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 197-208.
33.
TuckerL. R.LewisC. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
34.
WilliamsT. O.Jr.FallA. M.EavesR. C.DarchC.Woods-GrovesS. (2007). Factor analysis of the KeyMath-Revised Normative Update Form A. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 113-120.
