This study systematically investigated the synergistic effects of nozzle diameter and infill geometry on the mechanical properties and lightweight potential of short carbon fiber-reinforced ABS composites fabricated by fused deposition modeling (FDM). Sandwich specimens were produced with three nozzle diameters (0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mm) and four infill patterns: Gyroid, 2D-honeycomb, 3D-honeycomb, and solid. Three-point flexural tests revealed that increasing the nozzle diameter from 0.4 mm to 0.8 mm significantly enhanced interlayer bonding, leading to a maximum improvement of 21.7% in flexural strength (Gyroid) and 25.3% in flexural modulus (solid infill). At 50% infill density, the 3D-honeycomb structure exhibited superior performance, with 4.7%-19.5% higher flexural strength and 2.89%-20.4% higher modulus than other infill types. Notably, the mass-normalized analysis highlighted the Gyroid structure as the most efficient in material utilization. With a 0.8 mm nozzle system, the strength could reach 14.11 MPa/g and the modulus could reach 574.24 MPa/g, highlighting its unique lightweight potential. Microscopic crack observations further elucidated the distinct failure mechanisms governed by the interplay between nozzle diameter and infill architecture. This work provided a comprehensive understanding of the process-structure-performance relationship in FDM-fabricated composites, offering practical guidelines for parameter selection in automotive lightweight applications.
DilberogluUMGharehpapaghBYamanU, et al.The role of additive manufacturing in the era of industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf2017; 11: 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.148
2.
AhmadMNIshakMRMaidinNA, et al.Water absorption analysis of oil palm fibre reinforced acrylonitrile butadiene styrene composites by fick’s law. Journal of advanced research in experimental fluid mechanics and heat transfer2025; 20(1): 150–158. https://doi.org/10.37934/arefmht.20.1.150158
3.
ConnerBPManogharanGPMartofAN, et al.Making sense of 3-D printing: creating a map of additive manufacturing products and services. Addit Manuf2014; 1: 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.005
4.
OleffAKüsterBStonisM, et al.Process monitoring for material extrusion additive manufacturing: a state-of-the-art review. Progr Addit Manuf2021; 6(4): 705–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00192-4
5.
HmeidatNSPackRCTalleySJ, et al.Mechanical anisotropy in polymer composites produced by material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf2020; 34: 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101385
6.
JinYHeYFuJ, et al.Optimization of tool-path generation for material extrusion-based additive manufacturing technology. Addit Manuf2014; 1: 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.004
7.
AltıparmakSCYardleyVAShiZ, et al.Extrusion-based additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and future perspectives. J Manuf Process2022; 83: 607–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.09.032
8.
FidanIImeriAGuptaA, et al.The trends and challenges of fiber reinforced additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 102(5): 1801–1818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-03269-7
9.
SeifAAllahMMAMegahedM, et al.Hybridization of thermoplastic/glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites for lightweight structures. Mech Adv Mater Struct2025; 32(14): 3272–3287. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2024.2391545
10.
FerreiraIMadureiraRVillaS, et al.Machinability of PA12 and short fibre–reinforced PA12 materials produced by fused filament fabrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 107(1): 885–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04839-Z
11.
LiQZhaoWLiY, et al.Flexural properties and fracture behavior of CF/PEEK in orthogonal building orientation by FDM: microstructure and mechanism. Polymers2019; 11(4): 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11040656
12.
SunZLuoYChenC, et al.Mechanical enhancement of carbon fiber-reinforced polymers: from interfacial regulating strategies to advanced processing technologies. Prog Mater Sci2024; 142: 101221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101221
13.
DicksonANBarryJNMcDonnellKA, et al.Fabrication of continuous carbon, glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced polymer composites using additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf2017; 16: 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.004
14.
MeiHAliZYanY, et al.Influence of mixed isotropic fiber angles and hot press on the mechanical properties of 3D printed composites. Addit Manuf2019; 27: 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.008
15.
LuoMHeQWangH, et al.Tribological behavior of surface textured short carbon fiber-reinforced nylon composites fabricated by three-dimensional printing techniques. J Tribol2021; 143(5): 051105. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050372
16.
SangLHanSLiZ, et al.Development of short basalt fiber reinforced polylactide composites and their feasible evaluation for 3D printing applications. Compos B Eng2019; 164: 629–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.085
17.
LakhiarMTZhaoXGuoY, et al.Investigations on the mechanical and life cycle properties of novel marine-based sustainable BFRP composites. Constr Build Mater2024; 453: 139105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139105
18.
CozzolinoENapolitanoFRussoP, et al.Additive manufacturing of low environmental impact PLA-basalt/hemp biocomposites: life cycle assessment and mechanical properties. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2025; 139: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-15961-6
19.
TekinalpHLKuncVVelez-GarciaGM, et al.Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing. Compos Sci Technol2014; 105: 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009
20.
ShemelyaCMRiveraAPerezAT, et al.Mechanical, electromagnetic, and X-ray shielding characterization of a 3D printable tungsten–polycarbonate polymer matrix composite for space-based applications. J Electron Mater2015; 44(8): 2598–2607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-015-3687-7
MeißnerSKalischDAliyevR, et al.Load-dedicated fiber reinforcement of additively manufactured lightweight structures. J Compos Sci2025; 9(10): 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9100548
23.
LiuJGaynorATChenS, et al.Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Struct Multidiscip Optim2018; 57(6): 2457–2483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1994-3
24.
ArmanfarATasmektepligilAAKilicRT, et al.Embedding lattice structures into ship hulls for structural optimization and additive manufacturing. Ocean Eng2024; 301: 117601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117601
25.
LaleganiDMMohd AriffinMKA. The effects of combined infill patterns on mechanical properties in fdm process. Polymers2020; 12(12): 2792. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122792
26.
MengLZhangWQuanD, et al.From topology optimization design to additive manufacturing: today’s success and tomorrow’s roadmap. Arch Comput Methods Eng2020; 27(3): 805–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11831-019-09331-1
27.
XiaoZYangYXiaoR, et al.Evaluation of topology-optimized lattice structures manufactured via selective laser melting. Mater Des2018; 143: 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.023
28.
AbueiddaDWBakirMAl-RubRKA, et al.Mechanical properties of 3D printed polymeric cellular materials with triply periodic minimal surface architectures. Mater Des2017; 122: 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.018
29.
Jerez-MesaRTravieso-RodriguezJALlumà-FuentesJ, et al.Fatigue lifespan study of PLA parts obtained by additive manufacturing. Procedia Manuf2017; 13: 872–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.146
30.
ChacónJMCamineroMÁNúñezPJ, et al.Effect of nozzle diameter on mechanical and geometric performance of 3D printed carbon fibre-reinforced composites manufactured by fused filament fabrication. Rapid Prototyp J2021; 27(4): 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2020-0250
31.
TezelTKovanV. Determination of optimum production parameters for 3D printers based on nozzle diameter. Rapid Prototyp J2022; 28(1): 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-08-2020-0185
32.
FischerDEßbachCSchönherrR, et al.Improving inner structure and properties of additive manufactured amorphous plastic parts: the effects of extrusion nozzle diameter and layer height. Addit Manuf2022; 51: 102596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102596
