The main purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between microstructure and mechanical performance of polylactic acid when mixed with styrene-ethylene butylene-styrene copolymer and also graphene nanoplatelets. For this purpose, a series of neat polymer blends were first prepared with varying mixing ratios through a one-step melt mixing technique. Subsequently, the effect of various loadings of graphene nanoplatelets on the best mixing ratio (optimal composition) of the binary blend was investigated. To understand the different performances of various nanocomposites, the correlation of mechanical, rheological, and microstructural properties was thoroughly investigated using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, linear viscoelastic behavior, tensile testing, and impact strength analyses. Furthermore, the influence of the mixing sequence of nanocomposites preparation on the microstructure and mechanical performance of nanocomposites was studied. Results demonstrated that the incorporation of graphene nanoplatelets as well as mixing sequence has a substantial effect on the final properties of prepared nanocomposites which was deeply discussed.
VozniakIZaïriFHosseinnezhadR, et al.Design of hybrid PLA/PBS/POM composite based on in-situ formation of interpenetrating fiber networks. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2021; 151: 106667.
2.
ChaiJWangGZhangA, et al.Ultra-ductile and strong in-situ fibrillated PLA/PTFE nanocomposites with outstanding heat resistance derived by CO2 treatment. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2022; 155: 106849.
3.
AbdollahiSEhsaniMMorshedianJ, et al.Structural and electrochemical properties of PEO/PAN nanofibrous blends: prediction of graphene localization. Polym Compos2018; 39: 3626–3635.
4.
HadaeghniaMAhmadiSGhasemiI, et al.Manipulating the morphology of PA6/POE blends using graphene to achieve balanced electrical and mechanical properties. Compos Sci Technol2020; 200: 108412.
5.
OyamaHTAbeS. Stereocomplex poly (lactic acid) alloys with superb heat resistance and toughness. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng2015; 3: 3245–3252.
6.
YuBZhaoZFuS, et al.Fabrication of PLA/CNC/CNT conductive composites for high electromagnetic interference shielding based on pickering emulsions method. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2019; 125: 105558.
7.
SangeethaVHVargheseTONayakSK. Toughening of polylactic acid using styrene ethylene butylene styrene: mechanical, thermal, and morphological studies. Polym Eng Sci2016; 56: 669–675.
8.
ZhangXLiYHanL, et al.Improvement in toughness and crystallization of poly (L-lactic acid) by melt blending with ethylene/methyl acrylate/glycidyl methacrylate terpolymer. Polym Eng Sci2013; 53: 2498–2508.
9.
WachirahuttapongSThongpinCSombatsompopN. Effect of PCL and compatibility contents on the morphology, crystallization and mechanical properties of PLA/PCL blends. Energy Proc2016; 89: 198–206.
10.
LeeSLeeJW. Characterization and processing of biodegradable polymer blends of poly (lactic acid) with poly (butylene succinate adipate). Korea Aust Rheol J2005; 17: 71–77.
11.
RahimipourSBahri-LalehNEhsaniM, et al.Preparation and properties of enhanced bio-based PLA/PA6/graphene nanocomposites in the presence of an ester-amide exchange catalyst. J Polym Environ2021; 29: 2302–2309.
12.
ZuoXXueYWangL, et al.Engineering styrenic blends with poly (lactic acid). Macromolecules2019; 52: 7547–7556.
13.
SuZLiQLiuY, et al.Compatibility and phase structure of binary blends of poly (lactic acid) and glycidyl methacrylate grafted poly (ethylene octane). Eur Polym J2009; 45: 2428–2433.
14.
Bagheri-KazemabadSFoxDChenY, et al.Morphology, rheology and mechanical properties of polypropylene/ethylene-octene copolymer/clay nanocomposites: effects of the compatibilizer. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 1697–1704.
15.
WangJJinXLiC, et al.Graphene and graphene derivatives toughening polymers: toward high toughness and strength. Chem Eng J2019; 370: 831–854.
16.
ÁdámBWeltschZ. Thermal and mechanical assessment of PLA-SEBS and PLA-SEBS-CNT biopolymer blends for 3D printing. Appl Sci2021; 11: 6218.
17.
HofmannDThomannRMülhauptR. Thermoplastic SEBS elastomer nanocomposites reinforced with functionalized graphene dispersions. Macromol Mater Eng2018; 303: 1700324.
18.
TsouC-HKaoB-JYangM-C, et al.Biocompatibility and characterization of polylactic acid/styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene composites. Biomed Mater Eng2015; 26: S147–S154.
19.
LimaJCCAraújoEAGAgrawalP, et al.PLA/SEBS bioblends: influence of SEBS content and of thermal treatment on the impact strength and morphology. Macromol Symp2019; 383: 1700072.
20.
LeuYYMohd IshakZAChowWS. Mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of injection molded poly (lactic acid)/SEBS-g-MAH/organo-montmorillonite nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci2012; 124: 1200–1207.
21.
WangBYeXWangB, et al.Reactive graphene as highly efficient compatibilizer for cocontinuous poly (lactic acid)/poly (ε-caprolactone) blends toward robust biodegradable nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol2022; 221: 109326.
22.
ShabaniABabaeiAZanjanijamAR. Does nanoclay addition always lead to amelioration? Dual effects of the nanoclay on the PA-6/EVOH/SEBS ternary blends. Polym Adv Technol2019; 30: 983–997.
23.
SoltaniEShahrousvandMBabaeiA. An investigation on the reinforcement mechanism of the nano-sized carbonaceous filled epoxy-glass fiber hybrid-composites through analysis of fracture surfaces. Polym Compos2018; 39: E2460–E2471.
24.
GholizadehABabaeiAZiaratbanM, et al.Facile synthesis of nanographene by a high-yield and scalable method. Ceram Int2020; 46: 22861–22868.
25.
LiuMLinKYaoX, et al.Mechanics of reinforcement in a hybrid graphene and continuous glass fibre reinforced thermoplastic. Compos Sci Technol2023; 237: 110001.
26.
SaravananNRajasekarRMahalakshmiS, et al.Graphene and modified graphene-based polymer nanocomposites - a review. J Reinforc Plast Compos2014; 33: 1158–1170.
27.
KomrapitNPunyodomWWorajittiphonP. Compatibilizing and reinforcing an immiscible blend based on poly (lactic acid) with delaminated graphite: From raw graphite to enhanced polymer mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci2018; 135: 46821.
28.
GholizadehABabaeiAZiaratbanM. Analysis of dual role of nanographene on the microstructure-properties correlation of TPU/NG nanocomposite. Polym Adv Technol2021; 32: 1150–1161.
29.
HeidarhaeiMShariatiMEipakchiHR. Effect of interfacial debonding on stress transfer in graphene reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Int J Damage Mech2018; 27: 1105–1127.
30.
CosseyDEHodgeSAKaragiannidisPG. New nanocomposites based on poly (benzoxazine-co-epoxy) matrix reinforced by novel graphene single and mixed blend fillers. J Reinforc Plast Compos. 2023; 073168442311629.
31.
PaydayeshAArefazarAJalaliaraniA. A morphological study on the migration and selective localization of graphene in the PLA/PMMA blends. J Appl Polym Sci. 2016; 133(34): 43799.
32.
TanHLiLChenZ, et al.Phase morphology and impact toughness of impact polypropylene copolymer. Polymer2005; 46: 3522–3527.
33.
GöldelAMarmurAKasaliwalGR, et al.Shape-dependent localization of carbon nanotubes and carbon black in an immiscible polymer blend during melt mixing. Macromolecules2011; 44: 6094–6102.
34.
DadashiPBabaeiAKhoshnoodM. Investigating the role of PA6/GO interactions on the morphological, rheological, and mechanical properties of PA6/ABS/GO nanocomposites. Polym Technol Mater2023; 62: 756–770.
35.
AhmadzadehYBabaeiAGoudarziA. Assessment of localization and degradation of ZnO nano-particles in the PLA/PCL biocompatible blend through a comprehensive rheological characterization. Polym Degrad Stabil2018; 158: 136–147.
36.
AghjehMRKazerouniYOtadiM, et al.A combined experimental and theoretical approach to quantitative assessment of microstructure in PLA/PP/organo-clay nanocomposites; wide-angle X-ray scattering and rheological analysis. Compos B Eng2018; 137: 235–246.
37.
Jalali DilEFavisBD. Localization of micro- and nano-silica particles in heterophase poly(lactic acid)/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) blends. Polymer2015; 76: 295–306.
38.
TiwariSKOraonRDe AdhikariA, et al.A thermomechanical study on selective dispersion and different loading of graphene oxide in polypropylene/polycarbonate blends. J Appl Polym Sci2017; 134: 45062.
39.
ShahsavarFBabaeiA. Investigating the effect of chitosan functionalized graphene oxide on the performance of biodegradable polycaprolactone. J Reinforc Plast Compos. 2023.
40.
WuFZhangSChenZ, et al.Interfacial relaxation mechanisms in polymer nanocomposites through the rheological study on polymer/grafted nanoparticles. Polymer2016; 90: 264–275.
41.
KeshavarziSBabaeiAGoudarziA, et al.ZnO nanoparticles as chain elasticity reducer and structural elasticity enhancer: Correlating the degradating role and localization of ZnO with the morphological and mechanical properties of PLA/PP/ZnO nanocomposite. Polym Adv Technol2019; 30: 1083–1095.
42.
BasseriGMehrabi MazidiMHosseiniF, et al.Relationship among microstructure, linear viscoelastic behavior and mechanical properties of SBS triblock copolymer-compatibilized PP/SAN blend. Polym Bull2014; 71: 465–486.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
